|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Monday, December 2, 2002
Spell-check can be dangerous to your continued employment
The offending line, since corrected online, read: '"They fine guys $5,000 for having their pants out of their shiats, but he gets away with that?" said one coach.' Fer shnizzle, dawg. Note to self: Eliminate 'sh*t' from the spell check before posting an article This isn't the worst offense I have seen with someone not paying close attention while spell-checking. I remember a stray 'h' appearing near the description of the bride's dress, in the bridal announcements of a newspaper where I grew up. So the line no longer read "The bride wore...", but instead indicated the bride worked in the world's oldest profession. There was a fair bit of editors' yelling that day (a friend worked part-time at the paper), and the paper's owner ordered that a list of words be removed from the spelling dictionaries -- his argument was good: Why were those words in there in the first place, since they were not part of the style guide? A properly revised version of the announcement ran the following week. 12:47:49 PM [] blah blah blah'd on this [ blinked via FARK ]
Sunday, December 1, 2002
Conversant get more templates
Macrobyte Resources continues to make improvements to the Conversant experience. redmonk 2.0 : services : portfolio. via Jim - Steve Ivy has been using his talents to great effect:Macrobyte Resources approached me about designing a series of templates for their free web hosting service, Free-Conversant. The templates needed to be simple and approachable, while supporting... Having a number of templates available now appears to be an expectation for CMS or weblog software -- in reviews such a gap always seems to be mentioned now. 11:47:35 PM [] blah blah blah'd on this [ blinked via Duncan's Jotter ]
Wednesday, November 27, 2002
And for your mother...
So which of the many blogging tools that you've tried would you be willing to inflict on your mother, Alwin? Mom Is Back Actually, that could be a reasonable measure for software rating -- Would you feel comfortable recommending its use to your own mother (presuming you harbor no ill will toward the woman, of course...)? 11:12:23 AM [] blah blah blah'd on this [ blinked via ViewFromTheHeart ]
Validate this!
It is good to have another tool to add to the effort of creating good websites (Yes, the code in this site is a horror -- I'm lazy). Updated HTML and XHTML validator. The W3C has released an updated HTML and XHTML validator, which includes support for XHTML 1.1, MathML 2.0, additional character encodings, and more. You can either validate a URL, or directly upload the page to be checked. I wonder if it will handle quoted attributes any differently from it's predecessor? 11:08:10 AM [] blah blah blah'd on this [ blinked via Column Two ]
Monday, November 25, 2002
Have they won?
DaveW doesn't want to write about something big in his life, for fear of what some would do with that. John's page linked above is an inspiration for me. My dad is very sick. He's hanging in there, and our relationship has blossomed in what may be his last days. Of course I've been writing about it and it's some of the most beautiful writing I've ever done. But can't make it public, because the public Web can be such a harsh environment. I imagine how some of the "parody" sites would deal with it. My father and his struggle, his pain, his sweetness, are too precious to expose that way, at least while he's alive. How sad, to feel the need for self-censoring for this reason. 11:49:52 PM [] blah blah blah'd on this [ blinked via Scripting News ]
Sunday, November 24, 2002
There are those who can and those that cannot
Fred Sampson shares a few QOTD to make a political jab (And yes, Fred, I did like the funny, too). They struck a different chord for me, though, based on a recent read, Dietrich Dorner's The Logic of Failure, which drew may attention from its mention in Joel on Software...
Dietrich's book explores how poorly we tend to handle making decisions. Two commonalities that arise from his data are that those who tend to make better decisions often have more doubt about their decisions, and that poor decision makers will often concentrate on nonsense (or irrelevant details) rather than attempt to tackle the larger, more important issues. I'll have to post some more of my thoughts about this book sometime... 9:36:07 PM [] blah blah blah'd on this [ blinked via Fred Sampson's Radio Weblog ]
Friday, November 22, 2002
Hey, Dad! Watch me make it easier to identify good objectives!
David Carter-Tod shares a nice post from a training-related mailing list. The Heydad test of objective writing. Good one there -- I'll have to share this with some of the folks around here. Now I wonder what the magic phrase that pays might be for psychomotor or affective objectives? 12:47:44 PM [] blah blah blah'd on this [ blinked via Serious Instructional Technology ]
Thursday, November 21, 2002
© Copyright 2002 Gregor.
Doing just fine, thanks!
Just been really busy this past week. I was frantically trying to put together a conference tutorial, that I delivered yesterday afternoon. The results were good, but the process to get there was certainly trying. More blogging later, after I beat Radio into submission -- there's something very flakey about my connection here at the hotel, and Radio keeps switching to offline mode (I'm using Andy's offline toggle script, and something keeps triggering it. Grr...). 8:41:25 AM [] blah blah blah'd on this |
|