Tuesday, January 21, 2003
Then There Are the Poor.
It may not be class warfare, but it's breathtakingly provocative. One week after President Bush proposed billions in tax breaks for fretful stock owners, he revived a plan to wring an additional 10 hours of work each week from women with small children who are managing to hold a job under the federal welfare reform program. The program was hailed as an early success in reducing the welfare rolls. But it is now being threatened with ideological wrenching under the Bush proposal.

Not only would the marginal working mother on welfare face a 40-hour week ? six hours more than the national average for all women with young children ? but funding would be frozen for child care, transportation and all the other things she needs to make it possible for her to work in the first place. Inflation of about 11 percent has already eaten away at these benefits, meaning less for job training and other important support programs. But the president proposes to freeze funding at the 1996 ceiling of $17 billion.

10:02:55 PM    
A Touch of Class. When people like me stress how few Americans will gain from the Bush tax plan, we're not talking about envy; we're talking about priorities. By Paul Krugman. [New York Times: Opinion]:
A liberal and a conservative were sitting in a bar. Then Bill Gates walked in. "Hey, we're rich!" shouted the conservative. "The average person in this bar is now worth more than a billion!" "That's silly," replied the liberal. "Bill Gates raises the average, but that doesn't make you or me any richer." "Hah!" said the conservative, "I see you're still practicing the discredited politics of class warfare."

Am I caricaturing the debate? Alas, not at all. Whenever anyone points out the systematic tilt of the Bush administration toward the rich, the administration and its defenders immediately raise the cry of "class warfare." Yet when you look at the arguments the administration actually makes on behalf of its policy, they are as silly as that of the conservative in the bar. The difference is that the administration knows exactly what it's doing.

For example: On Saturday, in his weekly radio address, George W. Bush declared that "the tax relief I propose will give 23 million small-business owners an average tax cut of $2,042 this year." That remark is intended to give the impression that the typical small-business owner will get $2,000. But as the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities points out, most small businesses will get a tax break of less than $500; about 5 million of those 23 million small businesses will get no break at all. The average is more than $2,000 only because a small number of very wealthy businessmen will get huge tax cuts.

So the latest round of Bush tax cuts, like the previous round, mainly provides benefits to the very, very well off - and once again the administration is shamelessly misrepresenting the content of its own policies. But aside from the honor and integrity thing, should we care?

9:59:20 PM    
No comment.

Bush Proposal May Cut Tax on S.U.V.'s for Business. The White House economic plan would increase by 50 percent or more the deductions that small-business owners can take right away on the biggest sport utility vehicles and pickups. By Danny Hakim. [New York Times: Politics]

9:51:51 PM    
The Class President. The Bushes see the world through the prism of class, while denying that class matters. By Maureen Dowd. [New York Times: Opinion]:
"The Bushes see the world through the prism of class, while denying that class matters. They think as long as they don't act "snotty" or swan around with a lot of fancy possessions, that class is irrelevant.

They make themselves happily oblivious to the difference between thinking you are self-made and being self-made, between liking to clear brush and having to clear brush."

9:28:23 PM