| |
 |
Sunday, January 26, 2003 |
Historical Unconsciousness Seoirse McLaughlinFather McManus is at it again [in O'Bradaigh versus Adams: Classicism versus Historical Consciousness]. He doesn't seem to realise that there is a grave difference between "historical consciousness" and revisionism. For Adams and his ilk are not just revising strategies but the founding principles that republicanism stand on. Although there were good things that came from the Second Vatican Council, it also opened the door for a Protestant culture to take root in the Church, for Protestantism allows for a myriad of individual interpretations of theology, liturgy and morals. The universality of the Roman Catholic church has been ripped to shreds by this. Go to any ten churches around the world and tell me about the "catholic" nature of them! Fundamentally different liturgies, fundamentally different theological emphases and fundamentally different implicit and sometimes explicit moral teaching abound. Most criticism of Vatican II by what Father McManus would call "classicists" is not centered on the intent of the Council but on its outcome. The baby was, indeed, thrown out with the bath water, and he, if he has survived, is a grown man, wandering in a amnesiac's endless and formless haze, looking for his roots. [The Blanket: Historical Unconsciousness]
Comments: Google It! 12:31:53 PM
|
|

© Copyright 2003 The Badger.
|
|
|
|
|