|
|
Tuesday, April 8, 2003 |
SharpReader.You can see here that other engineers are looking at .Net the way Macr wants people to look at RIAs and Flash. Also, I've looked at SharpReader, and it feels snappy.Brad '.Net Guy' Wilson: Oh, and isn't it interesting that the first wave of .NET rich client apps that we've seen have all been blazingly fast and look appropriate for the environment... that definitely has never been true of Java, even today 8 years after release. Microsoft has a real advantage here that they need to leverage, by encouraging people to get away from awful web UIs and get back to rich client/server UIs. 3:26:42 PM |
Defining Rich InterfacesI would like to start up a discussion on Rich Interfaces. We at Macromedia have been promotion them for quite some months now, and we see new RIA's popping up every day, which is great. However, there is one thing that I think we all should try to promote a littlebit more; Fluent Interfaces.Well, thankfully I see a future for myself in RIAs, having more than a dozen years developing consumer-focused desktop software products. As I've said before, when I consider my options for building desktop applications, I look to ubiquity in platform deployment, and to simplicity in API design and usage. Apple offers Cocoa, MS offers .Net, Sun offers Java Swing, each with varying degrees of deployment and simplicity. I'm very much interested in seeing the details on how to build RIAs the Macromedia way. How will it stack up to these competitors? 3:21:16 PM |