|
|
Tuesday, May 13, 2003 |
Jurors' web-surfing is a problemBefore the Internet arose, judges would caution jurors not to read about the case in the newspaper. But most trials weren't covered by newspapers so this really wasn't a problem; and in the high-profile cases that were likely to be covered by the press the jurors were usually sequestered for the duration of the trial. In the world of the Internet, we are learning that mere admonishments may not do the trick. Or another way of looking at it is that perhaps the judicial admonishment never really worked; it was the fact that the information was not so easily available that kept jurors from doing independent research.The test for a fair and impartial trial must be redefined in an increasingly wired world. Changes of venue are already on the decline... 12:22:40 PM       |
Accessibility BlogMacromedia's Bob Regan now has a blog on the subject of accessibility. If you're interested in Section 508 / Accessibility, you should subscribe to this new blog.... [An Architect's View]Paulette may be interested in this from a legal perspective. 12:09:46 PM       |
Does GPS tracking require a warrant?The Seattle PI has a story about William Bradley Jackson, who was convicted partially on evidence that was collected by a GPS tracking device police had attached to his vehicle.Wow, what a great legal question! Can they simply follow him around without a warrant? Can they automate that without a warrant? What is the expectation of privacy when traveling in public property? 11:50:49 AM       |