Coyote Gulch's Climate Change News













Subscribe to "Coyote Gulch's Climate Change News" in Radio UserLand.

Click to see the XML version of this web page.

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.
 

 

Thursday, October 23, 2008
 

A picture named coloradoriverbasincgs.jpg

From email from the Colorado River District:

Colorado River District opposes Amendment 52; supports Referendum O

The Colorado River District Board of Directors voted unanimously at its October 22, 2008, regular meeting to oppose Amendment 52, a question appearing on the November 4 general election ballot that would impact funding for water supply projects. The board also voted to support of Referendum O, a measure that would make it easier to petition for a statuary ballot question while making it more difficult to petition for a constitutional ballot question.

The Board opposes Amendment 52's intention to divert Severance Tax funds away from the Colorado Department of Natural Resources and water supply projects and apply the money to transportation projects. The Board believes that the issue of water supply is too important to the State of Colorado for funding to be limited by Amendment 52.

Additionally, the Board opposes putting this kind of fiscal policy, currently the purview of the Colorado General Assembly, into Colorado's Constitution. Amendment 52 seeks to cap the amount of Severance Tax revenues available to the Department of Natural Resources at 2007-2008 levels and limits future revenue growth to the rate of inflation.

The Board's support for Referendum O is rooted in the need to limit questions on the ballot that seeking to change the constitution, a vehicle used more and more to create policy that should be accomplished by state statute. State statute is easier to adapt to changing times than is the constitution.

For more information, contact Jim Pokrandt at (970) 945-8522 x 236 or email jpokrandt@crwcd.org.


6:06:09 PM    

A picture named derrick.jpg

From the Rifle Citizen Telegram: "Rifle, Colorado City Council members voted 4-3 at the Wednesday, Oct. 15 meeting to not approve the application submitted by Laramie Energy II out of Grand Junction. Laramie was seeking the permit application for an exploration drilling project within five miles of the city's Beaver Creek watershed district. However, there were concerns about the proximity of the Beaver Creek Road and the effects that truck traffic might have on the city's water supply or repercussions should there be an oil or grease spill. A proposed performance bond of $200,000 by Laramie was suggested by the city's water resources engineer, Michael Erion, of Resource Engineering, Inc. Other suggestions included realignment of the road so traffic would not be so close to the watershed."

More Coyote Gulch coverage here.

"cc"
7:18:00 AM    



Click here to visit the Radio UserLand website. © Copyright 2009 John Orr.
Last update: 3/15/09; 3:43:36 PM.
This theme is based on the SoundWaves (blue) Manila theme.
October 2008
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31  
Sep   Nov