
The Lower Arkansas Valley Water Conservancy District is looking at going to court over the 40 year agreement to share storage between the Bureau of Reclamation and Aurora, according to the Pueblo Chieftain. From the article, "The Lower Arkansas Valley Water Conservancy District is contemplating a lawsuit against the Bureau of Reclamation following the final environmental assessment on a proposed 40-year contract that allows Aurora to store and exchange water in the Fryingpan-Arkansas Project...
"Singletary has talked in the past few months with the Lower Ark board about the possibility of filing a lawsuit if the assessment were issued without addressing concerns raised in a public comment period. Specifically, the Lower Ark is questioning how the exchange portion of the contract will affect the future in-basin exchanges and how storage will affect water quality, Singletary said...
"In its response to the Lower Ark, Reclamation said the Aurora contract has a provision that offers similar contract exchanges to entities within the Southeastern Colorado Water Conservancy District each year before approving any exchanges with Aurora. The Southeastern district, Colorado Springs Utilities, and the Pueblo Board of Water Works raised similar concerns about exchange priorities during public meetings last fall and in written comments to Reclamation...
"Reclamation stated there are no adverse consequences and the discussion on productivity is required in an EIS, but not the assessment. The Lower Ark also questioned whether the Aurora contract would contribute to more dry-up of land, out-migration and cultural changes in the area east of Pueblo. Reclamation replied there would be no change in existing water rights, and noted that even under a no-action alternative, Aurora's water from the rights it purchased on the Colorado Canal and Rocky Ford Ditch would leave the valley...
"A lawsuit over the decision to proceed with the contract is possible, Singletary added. 'We're certainly considering it, but I can't act unilaterally,' Singletary said. 'I haven't had enough time to look everything over, but I can't imagine we won't look into it.'"
Meanwhile here are some details about the proposed contract and the public comment period from the Pueblo Chieftain. From the article, "The Bureau of Reclamation is moving ahead on a final draft of a 40-year contract that would allow Aurora to use the Fryingpan-Arkansas Project to export water to the South Platte basin. 'We don't issue the final draft of the contract until the NEPA process is done,' said Reclamation spokeswoman Kara Lamb Monday, referring to the National Environmental Protection Act. 'The latest draft will be going out shortly for public review.' Once the final draft is released, there will be another 60-day public comment period before the final contract is signed. Aurora would pay about twice the rate entities within the Southeastern Colorado Water Conservancy District pay for storage of non-project water. Aurora also has agreed to pay Southeastern about $24 million over the life of the contract under a 2003 agreement...
"Under mitigation measures, it reduces the amount of temporary storage under annual excess capacity contracts at Lake Pueblo to 70,000 acre-feet from 80,000 acre-feet, as approved in a 2006 environmental assessment. Requests for excess-capacity storage typically range from 10,000 to 40,000 acre-feet, but have increased in recent years. Additionally, the Pueblo Board of Water Works plans to increase its account to 15,000 acre-feet, up from the current 6,000 acre-feet, within the next 20 years and Colorado Springs has requested a long-term contract for 28,000 acre-feet. Aurora and Colorado Springs were the first to use excess capacity storage in Lake Pueblo, beginning in 1986. Reclamation will monitor Aurora contracts daily 'to better understand real-time use of contracted storage,' Reclamation stated. Aurora would be able to fill and empty its space in Lake Pueblo as needed, as long as the reservoir has space. When the reservoir fills, as occasionally has been the case since it began storing water in 1975, Aurora's water would be the first to spill...
"Reclamation also put a provision in to reassess the contract if it causes problems with the Arkansas River Compact. Kansas raised numerous objections about water quantity and quality during the public review of the assessment. Reclamation's replies were based on reports from the Colorado Division of Water Resources and Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment. Kansas continually has disputed Colorado's figures in a U.S. Supreme Court lawsuit filed in 1986 over the compact...
"The Bureau of Reclamation is expected to sign a 40-year contract with Aurora for long-term excess capacity storage contract following a finding of no significant impact last week after an environmental assessment:
"- Aurora will be able to store up to 10,000 acre-feet of water in an account in Lake Pueblo, which will allow it to exchange water from its purchases of water rights in Otero and Crowley counties. The account can be emptied and refilled as often as needed.
"- Aurora will be able to exchange up to 10,000 acre-feet of its water in Lake Pueblo in any given year for Fryingpan-Arkansas water in Twin Lakes in paper trades with the Bureau of Reclamation. Reclamation will determine the amount of water available for exchange each year and exchanges cannot interfere with voluntary flow programs.
"- Aurora will pay about $45 million to Reclamation over the next 40 years, initially $43 per acre-foot for storage and $49 per acre-foot for exchanges. An inflationary rate of 1.79 percent and a fluctuating charge for operations and maintenance are included in the contract. Money from the contract will repay federal costs for building the Fryingpan-Arkansas Project."
Category: Colorado Water
7:37:14 AM
|