|
|
Saturday, March 15, 2008
|
|
| |
The Oil Shale/Tar Sands PEIS Comment Period is open until 3/20/08, according to the Oil Shale and Tar Sands Programmatic EIS Information Center. Be sure to get your comments in on the efforts to produce cheap hydrocarbons from rock with an energy density the same as that of potatoes, using a process that will require more CO2 belching coal-fired power plants and use up the remaining undeveloped water in the Upper Colorado River system.
Category: 2008 Presidential Election
9:07:32 AM 
|
|
From The Fort Lupton Press: "[Fort Lupton] must meet a wastewater compliance deadline or face fines of up to $10,000 a day...According to action memoranda UAM 2008-005, Fort Lupton's wastewater treatment plant permit required the city to complete a mixing zone analysis as part of a routine Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment wastewater discharge compliance certification. The analysis, due last May, appears to have gone under the radar. Notified of the non-compliance in June, the city requested two subsequent extensions, resulting in a final analysis due last September."
Category: Colorado Water
8:52:25 AM
|
|
From The Estes Park Trail-Gazette: "Water tap fees for new customers wanting to connect to the Estes Park municipal water system may increase drastically if a utility department proposal is accepted. One-time connection charges would increase approximately 143 percent for new customers if the rate increase is approved later this year by the town board. The current connection charges for new customers is $7,240 for a single family hookup. The proposed increase is to $10,390. There are two components to the Town's connection charge structure. One is a System Development Charge (SDC) and the other is a water right fee. According to utilities director Bob Goehring, the current SDC portion of the fee has not changed since 1995 when it was set at $1,840. The proposal is to raise it to $4,940, an increase of 268 percent.
"The water rights fee was last increased in 2003 following a study by the company of Black and Veatch. It was increased from $2,000 to $5,400. The latest suggestion is to increase this to $5,450. Fees for multi-family units, accommodations and commercial would also be increased under the proposal presented Tuesday night to the Town board at its March 11 meeting. Multi-family connections would increase from $5,068 to $7,275; accommodations from $4,344 to $6,235 and commercial to $3,270 from $2,300. All increases are based upon an ERU (Equivalent Residential Unit)."
From The Sterling Journal Advocate: "The Sterling City Council Tuesday night approved increasing rates for city water users. The price of consuming water in Sterling will increase with the April 1 bills. The City Council Tuesday night approved lowering the miniumum consumption rate to 1,000 gallons per month, and adding a charge for use above the 1,000 gallons. Presently, city water customers are charged based on a minimum use of $8.25 per 4,000 gallons per month. A charge is added to the bill for consumption surpassing the 4,000-gallon minimum. Beginning April 1, the minimum will decrease to 1,000 gallons monthly. The approved increase means rates for residents who use about 10,000 gallons of water monthly will see an increase of about $12.50, about the cost of two people eating at a fast-food restaurant. City Manager Joe Kiolbasa said city records indicate about 19 percent of the city's water customers will remain within the minimum-use range, even with the reduction of the minimum by 75 percent."
Category: Colorado Water
8:48:49 AM
|
|
From The Boulder Daily Camera: "Winter storms and snow notwithstanding, this winter was still warmer than average worldwide, the government reported Thursday. The global temperature for meteorological winter -- December, January and February -- averaged 54.38 degrees Fahrenheit, 0.58 degrees warmer than normal for the last century, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration reported. Temperatures have been rising over recent years, raising concerns about the effects of global warming, generally attributed to human-induced impacts on the atmosphere. While it was warmer than normal, the just-completed winter was the coolest since 2000-01, which climate experts attributed to the presence of moderate-to-strong La Niña, or cooling of the tropical Pacific Ocean, which can affect conditions around the world. For the United States, this winter's average temperature was 33.2 degrees, 0.2 degrees above the 20th century average."
Category: Climate Change News
8:45:24 AM
|
|
From The Pueblo Chieftain: "Four new Eastern Fremont County board members were sworn in Thursday during the Upper Arkansas Water Conservancy District meeting, signaling the start of their representation of newly included district lands. Last November, voters approved inclusion of eastern Fremont County, encompassing the towns of Canon City, Florence and Penrose, in the Upper Arkansas Water Conservancy District. On Nov. 29, District Judge David Thorson of Canon City signed the election results, making the inclusion official. Four new board members have been approved by judicial appointment. Those new members are former Canon City Mayor Bill Jackson, who made his living as owner of a tree nursery; local grower and Colon Orchard owner Manny Colon of Canon City; Penrose Water District board member John Sandefur, who led the inclusion effort; and Penrose Chamber Executive Director William McGuire."
More Coyote Gulch coverage here.
Category: Colorado Water
8:42:08 AM
|
|
Colorado's proposed new irrigation efficiency rules for the Arkansas Valley were discussed at a recent meeting of the Prowers County Board of Commissioners, according to The Lamar Ledger. From the article:
The Prowers County Board of Commissioners discussed Arkansas River Basin agricultural watering rule changes with a representative from Governor Bill Ritter's office during Tuesday's board meeting...
Commissioner Gene Millbrand said he was concerned over the apparent disregard to the efforts of local ag producers to conserve water and become more efficient. "The farmers took it upon themselves to become more efficient, then they are being punished for it," said Millbrand. Fellow Commissioner Clede Widener said he did not understand the need for the studies because the water being sent down the Arkansas River to fulfill the river compact has been more then adequate in recent years. "We still have to deliver water at the state line. That doesn't change." Virgil Cochran from Southeast Land and Environment, who represents the commissioners on several regional water related boards and commissions, said he believed a system wide study of the river would be much more beneficial and cost effective. Commissioner Joe Marble raised the issue of tamarisk control and eradication along the river. Marble informed Swanson of recent discussions with entities in Kansas to partner with Colorado interests in a joint effort to control the invasive species. Swanson said the governor's office was interested in developing a dialogue concerning water issues in the region and said she would forward information from the call to the State Water Engineer Dick Wolfe and on to the governor.
More Coyote Gulch coverage here.
Category: Colorado Water
8:36:53 AM
|
|
The San Luis Valley is bracing for possible flooding this spring owing to the monster snowpack accumulating in the mountains, according to The Valley Courier. From the article:
Will the San Luis Valley see flooding this year, and if so, where? Pat McDermott, spokesman for the Colorado Division of Water Resources Division III office, said this week that one of the areas he is most concerned about this year is the lower Conejos River system. "If you look at the San Luis Valley in general, the southern end of the Valley ... is where we are most likely to have flooding in my opinion," he told members of the Rio Grande Roundtable this week. McDermott said the snowpack in the La Jara Creek and Alamosa River areas is above 200 percent of normal. "There will be some flooding this year," he predicted.
He said Platoro Reservoir will likely provide good flood coverage for the upper Conejos area, but he was concerned about the area below Antonito. "There's uncontrolled flow on the Rio San Antonio and Los Pinos," he said. "We expect high water in the Rio San Antonio system. It is going to flood and get into the low lands." He said Los Pinos and San Antonio Rivers will run off probably by May, and the sloughs and low lands past Manassa and Las Sauces could have some problems because of the amount of run off in those rivers this year. Retired Colorado Division of Water Resources Division III Division Engineer Steve Vandiver said the amount of water forced to flow through the system to meet the Rio Grande Compact obligation this year could also be a problem particularly for Conejos, Los Pinos and San Antonio Rivers. He said about half of the water in that river system would have to be delivered to downstream states to meet the compact. "That means tremendously high flows on the Conejos and Los Pinos and San Antonio for a substantial period of time." McDermott said the entire flow right now is being sent downriver to lessen the pressure on the river later on. McDermott said the low-lying lands around La Jara Creek are going to experience some problems. He said county roads such as South River Road could have some water across them this year. He said in the high water year of 1995 south of Alamosa looked like a giant lake. "We are going to have that this year," he said. McDermott said he expected Terrace Reservoir to fill this year. Vandiver said Terrace Reservoir has spilled seven times since he has been in the Valley. "There's nothing you can do once it goes over the spillway," he said. He said Terrace is half full already.
"If we get 1,200-1,300 cfs [cubic feet per second] screaming down the Alamosa River, yes we are going to have localized flooding with that," McDermott said. "We hope that isn't the case." He said he did not predict a catastrophic flow on the Alamosa River, but it will be high water. On the east side of the Valley McDermott said it would be an abundant water year but not incredibly high. He said Mountain Home and Smith Reservoirs are not big enough to contain all the water they may receive this year, so some of the county roads might see some flooding, but he did not predict huge damage in that part of the Valley. McDermott had concerns about Rock Creek this year. He said people who have built residences in that area southwest of Alamosa since the last high water years will likely experience some problems because of flooding in the Rock Creek drainage. That could come as early as late April or May, he said...
As far as the Crestone and Saguache areas, McDermott did not foresee flooding problems. "Probably it will be a good year for them to irrigate up there," he said. On the western part of the Valley McDermott cautioned canals such as the Rio Grande Canal to pay attention to La Garita and Canero Creek flows. "We are going to see water we haven't seen ponding along Highway 285 and 17 but not a horribly damaging situation. The canals will have to pay attention." He added, "It will be a lake out there between Monte Vista and Alamosa in a lot of that low lying area."
In the Del Norte and South Fork areas where people have built homes along the river and flood plain areas, there may be reason for alarm this year, McDermott said. The Rio Grande, Santa Maria and Continental Reservoirs will help take some of the flow, he said, but they cannot take it all. The runoff from Wolf Creek this year will be "pretty impressive," McDermott said. Tributaries such as Pinos Creek and San Francisco Creek around Del Norte may see some localized flooding, McDermott said, especially if debris in the creeks clog them up. "There could be some property damage in those kinds of situations."
More news on possible flooding in the Crested Butte area from The Crested Butte News. They write:
Both the Town and Gunnison County have been busy preparing for potential flooding throughout the county due to large snowfall this winter. The Gunnison Basin's snowpack was at 151 percent of average on March 1, according to the Natural Resources Conservation Service. Both governments have ordered sandbags and other materials in case of flooding and are encouraging citizens to be prepared. The town of Crested Butte has updated its 100 year flood plain map. It's available at www.townofcrestedbutte.com under the maps tab. Gunnison County emergency services coordinator Scott Morrill says homeowners should consider purchasing flood insurance and those who have it should review their policy. "People need to make sure that they know how they're covered," Morrill says. "And for those who don't live in flood plains, it would be worth checking into (insurance), because there's so much snow out there." The deadline to acquire flood insurance is looming. There is a 30-day wait between purchasing insurance and being covered in a flood incident. Insurance can run from $350 a year for low-lying areas not in an established flood plain, up to several thousand dollars per year for at-risk homes.
Category: Colorado Water
8:31:21 AM
|
|
Here's an update on the proposed uranium operation in South Park from The Fairplay Flume. From the article:
Staking for proposed uranium mines in a 4,000-acre area of land northeast of Hartsel will begin at the end of March and could last as long as a week. Horizon Nevada Uranium Inc., the company that is proposing the mines, has 60 days to complete the staking process as of March 25, a process that is not expected to take long to complete. It would have until May 24 to complete the staking. If a plot of land is selected for a proposed mine, the landowner would be compensated, said Bill Wilson, president of Horizon Nevada Uranium Inc. The exact amount of compensation for a land lease or royalties for removing uranium from a site haven't been decided, but Wilson said it would be similar for every property owner who had a mine set up on his or her property. Not all property owners who received a notice of intent to place a mine claim will have a mine on their property. A map of the properties to be staked isn't available yet, Wilson said, because his company isn't done creating it.
Wilson said he intends to go in front of the board of county commissioners sometime in April with his plans and to answer questions, something he said he isn't required to do. No county approval for the uranium mining is required, he said. That meeting hasn't been scheduled yet, according to the County Commissioners Office. Park County Commissioner John Tighe said the county is currently "auditing the situation" of the proposed uranium mines. Tighe wasn't sure if the county could do anything to affect the progress of the mines, but he said he was speaking with Developmental Services Coordinator Tom Eisenman and County Attorney Lee Phillips to determine what power the county would have. "The health, safety and welfare of the community is what we're looking at," he said.
Proposed Colorado legislation could place tighter restrictions on the mining process and give counties more control over what type of mining to allow. House Bill 1161 would require the water quality in all uranium mines in Colorado to be returned to the pre-mining water conditions...
"The uranium rush could trample our open spaces and poison our waters," Pam Kiely, legislative program director of Environment Colorado, said in a Feb. 20 press release. Wilson was critical of the legislation, telling The Flume that in order to return the well to it's pre-drilling state, uranium would have to be pumped back down into the aquifer...House Bill 1165 gives counties the right to control mining inside their boarders[sic]...
Because of the uranium and other minerals already present in the aquifer, Wilson said, that water probably wouldn't meet the Environmental Protection Agency's standard for drinkable water, making it something called an exempt aquifer. The exempt aquifer is below the aquifer that is used to supply drinking water. It is possible to drill through an existing aquifer, with clean, drinkable water, to the one below it without contaminating the upper level. Although contamination is a risk, Wilson said safeguards are in place to prevent contamination. Wells are pressurized and monitoring wells are drilled around the mining site. If contaminants are spreading, the monitoring wells detect the seepage and the pressure is adjusted, stopping the seepage, according to Wilson.
More Coyote Gulch coverage here, here and here.
Category: 2008 Presidential Election
8:04:00 AM
|
|
From The North Platte Telegraph: "Colorado officials presented their plan to purchase water rights, pump water into a pipeline and deliver it to the Nebraska border for compact compliance. [Lower Republican Natural Resources District Manager Mike Clements] Clements said no action was taken by the administration in Kansas City. 'This (the pipeline) is not a done deal for Colorado," he said. "Kansas thanked Colorado for the presentation, but said they wanted to study the proposal." Clements said that if Colorado proceeds with the pipeline idea, Nebraska officials must consider what the long-term impacts could be on Nebraska's compact agreement. Any state proposal for complying with the compact settlement must be approved by all three members. Engineering committees of the three states will meet sometime before April 11 and there will be a another full compact administration meeting May 15 and 16 in Kansas City."
More Coyote Gulch coverage here.
Category: Colorado Water
7:52:14 AM
|
|
Trout Unlimited is looking at the effects of the Southern Delivery System on cold water fisheries. Here's a report from The Pueblo Chieftain. They write:
The disruption of flows for fish in the Arkansas River and on the Western Slope may not be fully accounted for in a draft environmental impact statement for the Southern Delivery System. "Our real focus is on the impacts that affect coldwater reaches," Drew Peternell, director of Trout Unlimited's Colorado Water Project, told local Trout Unlimited members this week. The state water project may decide to oppose SDS if mitigation can't be agreed upon, Peternell said. He added that he has not read all of the technical documents associated with the report and has met only once with Colorado Springs Utilities officials to iron out his concerns.
Peternell also came to Pueblo to answer questions about how SDS could affect fisheries and to begin collecting local concerns about the project. "The Colorado Water Project wants local input and wants ideas to propose," Peternell said. "If they can't incorporate those ideas, we may be compelled to be a thorn in their side and oppose the project."[...]
Peternell criticized the draft EIS for looking at each of the alternatives against a "no-action" alternative, which in turn is the only alternative measured against existing conditions. The no-action name simply means there would be no federal contracts issued, but the alternative still includes a pipeline that would reduce flows in the Arkansas River, Peternell said. Reclamation includes it as the most likely scenario if no federal contracts are used. In this case, Colorado Springs would take the bulk of its new water supplies through Fremont County, as well as changing the way it diverts some of its other water supplies. "What we've seen is that each of the alternatives has a slightly different set of flow impacts," Peternell said.
Trout Unlimited is concerned only about coldwater fisheries in the SDS process, including the reach below Pueblo Dam, the Upper Arkansas River and the Western Slope diversions used by Colorado Springs - Twin Lakes, Homestake, the Fryingpan-Arkansas Project and the Blue River. Colorado Springs would use more water from the Western Slope as it further develops its water rights, but the impacts to streams on the other side of the Continental Divide are given scant attention in the draft EIS, Peternell said...
The Arkansas River flows in the draft EIS are expressed in terms of average annual flows, which could mask the true impact on fish, Peternell said. "With an average annual flow, you don't see the extreme high and low flows," Peternell said. "It's not the best way to look at streamflow." Those extreme flows, either high or low, are most likely to occur in certain months of the year, based on historic records, Peternell said...
In the draft EIS, the flows on the Upper Arkansas River do not fluctuate much from one alternative or another, but Peternell was concerned Colorado Springs is not obligated to participate in the voluntary flow program, an agreement among federal, state and regional interests, which proscribes certain flows for rafting and fishing. Riley said participation in the voluntary flow program would be a part of any excess-capacity contract with Reclamation. "We're prepared to meet as many needs as we can," Riley said. Riley also cleared up confusion among fishermen about the amount of water that would be taken out of the river. While the pipeline would have a capacity for 78 million gallons per day, plus 18 million gallons per day for Pueblo West, it would not use that much every day. SDS diversions would average about 43 million gallons per day by 2046, according to the draft EIS. "What we're doing is taking water when it's plentiful and storing it in reservoirs for the dry times," Riley said...
Colorado Springs plans to build a terminal storage reservoir on Jimmy Camp Creek about five years after the pipeline is complete, tentatively in 2017. A second reservoir to regulate exchange flows on Fountain Creek would be built a few years after that.
More Coyote Gulch coverage here.
Category: Colorado Water
7:47:53 AM
|
|
They were dumping fish into Summit Reservoir on Wednesday, according to The Cortez Journal. From the article:
Nearly 20,000 good-sized rainbow trout were dumped in Summit Lake Wednesday and Thursday, restocking a lake where just six months ago all the fish inside were poisoned. "We are just excited to get some fish back in the lake," said Jim White, aquatic biologist with the Colorado Division of Wildlife. Ten thousand of the 7- to 8-inch fish were stocked under the ice at the lake on Wednesday, and 10,000 more were stocked on Thursday. The fish came from the Hotchkiss National Fish Hatchery, located about 20 miles east of Delta. White said the fish were getting too big for the hatchery and needed to be released as soon as possible...
In late August, about 40 Colorado Division of Wildlife employees, dressed in protective suits and breathing masks, dumped rotenone in the reservoir and one by one, dead fish floated to the surface. All the fish in the lake were killed to get rid of the nonnative white sucker, a fish that over the years nearly took over the reservoir, making the water murky and difficult for other species to survive. In all, 113 gallons of liquid rotenone was sprayed into the water last year, and 3,900 pounds of powdered rotenone were mixed into the water. Rotenone is a poison derived from a tropical plant, and it prevents fish from absorbing oxygen. White said the poison broke down in the lake well before winter set in. White discouraged anyone from fishing on the lake until spring because the ice is very unstable and the rainbows are still a bit too small. An additional 25,000 catchable rainbow trout will be stocked later this spring, bringing the total number of rainbows in the lake up to 45,000. In addition, black crappie, largemouth bass, channel catfish and blue gill will be stocked this spring, White said.
More Coyote Gulch coverage here.
Category: Colorado Water
7:28:15 AM
|
|
Here's some snowpack news from The Loveland Reporter-Herald. From the article:
The two main basins that provide water to the Loveland region are the South Platte River Basin, which has a snowpack water content sitting at 110 percent of average, and the Upper Colorado River Basin, which sits at 125 percent of average, according to Werner. When the snow in those basins melts, it ends up in the Big Thompson, Poudre, Little Thomp-son and St. Vrain rivers as well as Boulder Creek. Water from the Colorado River winds up in Loveland via pipeline. Northern Water stores its share in three main reservoirs, Carter Lake, Horsetooth Reservoir and Boulder Reservoir. The city of Loveland has Green Ridge Glade Reservoir, which was expanded in 2004.
While snowpack exceeds the 30-year average, and forecasts call for that trend to continue, water levels in some reservoirs are still lower than they should be. That, Werner said, is the lasting effect of an extended drought. Before the blizzard in March 2003, Northern Water's reservoirs sat at 10 percent of average. Now, they are 85 percent of average -- much better than five years ago but by no means as high as they should be, according to Werner.
More snowpack news from The Pueblo Chieftain. They write:
Snowpack in the Arkansas Basin is at record levels through mid-March, with several feet of snow with high water content at nearly all sites. Snowpack was at 159 percent of average in the basin as of Friday, and running ahead of any previously recorded years. Already, snowpack is far above the maximum average accumulation as well. Conditions were similar in the San Luis Valley, where officials are concerned about spring flooding and snowpack is rated at 154 percent of average. Statewide, snowpack was 126 percent of average. In the Upper Colorado River Basin, where the valley's transmountain water originates, snow levels were holding at 125 percent of average...
Reclamation has cleared 51,500 acre-feet of space in Turquoise Lake by running water into Lake Pueblo all winter. Still, there are about 9,000 acre-feet in Lake Pueblo, and another 12,900 acre-feet of space available in Twin Lakes for Fry-Ark water. Another 22,600 acre-feet of water in Lake Pueblo is carry-over from the winter water storage program and should be evacuated by May 1. That totals about 95,000 acre-feet of storage space, just about right for current projections. That means about 40,000 acre-feet of water stored in excess-capacity accounts in Lake Pueblo is not in immediate danger of "spilling" - a release of water to make room for project water. Meanwhile, winter water storage ends at midnight today. The storage program allows farmers to store water from mid-November to mid-March rather than irrigate under a 1990 court decree, after it began under a voluntary program in 1975. As of Friday, it appeared a little more than 152,000 acre-feet would be stored in winter storage at all reservoirs. That's slightly more than last year, but about average for the life of the program.
The Pueblo Board of Water Works is storing more than 43,000 acre-feet of water in its accounts at four reservoirs, about 9,000 acre-feet more than at the same time last year. Clear Creek Reservoir in northern Chaffee County, drained last year for repairs, is about one-third full, adding nearly 4,000 acre-feet since October.
More snowpack news form The Northern Colorado Business Report. They write:
The signs so far have been very encouraging. Mountain snowpacks across the state were about 133 percent of average at the end of February, the best level in a decade. Every basin in the state was reporting above-average snowpacks last month, and several more storms dumped on the high country as March began. But Brian Werner, spokesman for the Northern Colorado Water Conservancy District, sounds a note of caution about all of that. "I don't think we're willing to say this is a banner (water) year yet," he said. "We're still about 15 percent below average in terms of storage." NCWCD provides water to municipal and agricultural users in Northern Colorado and stores water in Lake Granby, Boulder Reservoir, Horsetooth Reservoir and Carter Lake. Werner said the four storage reservoirs were at 49 percent, 46 percent, 73 percent and 14 percent of average respectively on March 1. Werner said Carter's level was exceptionally low because of recent improvements made there, with Horsetooth being the beneficiary of water that would have normally been stored at Carter. With the exception of Carter, all of the storage reservoirs were at about the same level at this time last year, Werner noted, but last year there was less snowpack than this year. Werner said the district has been struggling to regain its normal storage levels since the drought peaked in 2002-03...
"There's an old saying that goes, 'Delight in the cold, wet weather in the spring because you'll be celebrating at harvest time,'" [Nolan Doesken] added.
Rafters are already gearing up for the biggest flows in recent memory down the Dolores River according to The Cortez Journal. They should be blowing through Snaggletooth. From the article:
Boaters and lovers of the Lower Dolores River, ready your rafts and shake out those life vests. This spring promises to be a good one. "It's definitely going to be one of the better rafting seasons in 22 years," said Mike Preston, general manager of the Dolores Water Conservancy District...
Recently, Dolores River Dialogue, a group of people with different interests concerning the river, agreed on an operating plan for the spill into the Lower Dolores River. The forecast shows that in April flows will be between 800 and 1,500 cubic feet per second and will be that way except from April 14-17 when the Colorado Division of Wildlife conducts a fish survey. The forecast for spills from McPhee Reservoir shows Lower Dolores River flows should be 1,500 cfs through the first half of May, increase to a peak of 3,000 cfs in the third week of May, and decrease to approximately 2,000 cfs in the final week of May. The spill is scheduled to end around June 30. Preston said the committee agreed of the spill forecast. Several objectives will be met, including filling the reservoir, conducting fish surveys, rafting, and flushing out riverbanks. "The Dolores River Dialogue has primarily focused on downstream ecology," Preston said...
Already, Daniels has received numerous calls from rafters throughout Western states. He said most people are excited about a rapid called Snaggletooth. "It's one of the classic class five (more challenging) rapids of the West, and people come from all over to run it," he said. He said rafting that rapid with a raft really needs a 1,200 cfs flow. Last year, Daniels said, a short release left some rafters stranded on the lower section of the river because flows were shut down when weather warmed and demand on the reservoir increased. "We are trying to work with local agencies to be sure that doesn't happen this year," Daniels said. Three years ago, there was a three-week long release that gave rafters a great season. "The impact is phenomenal on the local economy," Daniels said. Preston was quick to point out that the spill forecast can change at any moment due to water inflows and snowpack melt.
Category: Colorado Water
7:18:18 AM
|
|
|
|
© Copyright
2008
John Orr.
Last update:
4/1/08; 8:12:18 AM.
|
|
|
