Statistiques d'adoption de la gestion de la connaissance au Canada. Une étude fort intéressante de Statistique Canada: La gestion des connaissances en pratique au Canada, 2001 [AmeliorAction - Le Carnet]

Une parution qui amenait un commentaire critique d'un lecteur canadien

Speaking as a Canadian, it is hard not to feel somewhat dismayed by the
report.  Of note is the fact that the word "community" (let alone community
of practice) does not appear once in the document.  Further, on page 13,
the study says that "almost every practitioner ascribed the responsibility
for their knowledge management practices to managers or executives", from
which the report intuits the "importance of leadership to KM" rather than
denoting the lack of ownership in KM programs.  Leadership was the top KM
practice and Knowledge Codification was second from the top.

For me, this report implies that neither Statistics Canada, nor the
departments they surveyed really *get* next-generation KM.  Am I being too
harsh?  Do they simply have a different definition of KM? [com-prac]

10:20:51 PM