|
 |
Wednesday, March 23, 2005 |
Students Who Are Tested in a Context
Differing Significantly from their Instructional
Environment Do Worse. David Wiley hits on another news article
describing that Woessmann-Fuchs study that suggests
computers do not support learning and makes a good point
about methodology: "Why would we be shocked or
surprised to find that kids who spend more time with paper
and pencil outperform their high tech peers on paper and
pencil tests??? If the tests had been administered on
computers, which group would have been the top
performer?" The news
report itself merely repeats without criticism
the claims made by Woessmann-Fuchs and the editing is
sloppy enough to leave some factual errors in the story.
By David Wiley, Iterating Toward Openness, March 21, 2005
[Refer][Research][Reflect] [OLDaily]
7:20:06 AM Google It!.
|
|
One Of Us Is Smarter Than All Of
Us. Why I talk so frequently about autonomy and
diversity: "The wisdom of crowds comes not from the
consensus decision of the group, but from the aggregation
of the ideas/thoughts/decisions of each individual in the
group." In other words, "Paradoxically, the best
way for a group to be smart is for each person in it to
think and act as independently as possible." Via elearnspace.
By Kathy Sierra, Creating Passionate Users, March 21, 2005
[Refer][Research][Reflect] [OLDaily]
7:17:20 AM Google It!.
|
|
© Copyright 2005 Bruce Landon.
|