| Last modified: |
17/10/2004; 8:05:21
|
| Reckless Administration May Reap Disastrous Consequences: |
'This nation is about to embark upon the first test of a revolutionary doctrine applied in an extraordinary way at an unfortunate time. The doctrine of preemption -- the idea that the United States or any other nation can legitimately attack a nation that is not imminently threatening but may be threatening in the future -- is a radical new twist on the traditional idea of self defense. It appears to be in contravention of international law and the UN Charter. And it is being tested at a time of world-wide terrorism, making many countries around the globe wonder if they will soon be on our -- or some other nation's -- hit list.' -U.S. Senator Robert Byrd, Feb. 12, 2003
|
| On the road to losing the peace : |
'It was bad enough for the U.S. to have endured the intelligence failures that led to Sept. 11; it's another thing to know that 18 months, billions of dollars and untold numbers of bombs later that Osama bin Laden and most of his top advisers remain on the loose. This failure ought to be thrown daily in Mr. Bush's face, but he has diverted attention to Iraq, where the United States is about to make a mistake of historic proportions.' -Jeffrey Simpson in The Globe and Mail, 18 Feb 2003
|
|
|
Monday, 5 May 2003
. .< 11:06:53 PM >
AlterNet: U.S. Hires Christian Extremists to Produce Arabic News 'The U.S. government this week launched its Arabic language satellite TV news station for mostly Muslim Iraq. It is being produced in a studio ? Grace Digital Media ? controlled by fundamentalist Christians who are rabidly pro-Israel. That's grace as in "by the grace of God." '
I always said that Bush was one clever fellow. Someone make it stop!
. .< 10:56:01 PM >
Sunday Herald 'The Bush administration has admitted that Saddam Hussein probably had no weapons of mass destruction.
Senior officials in the Bush administration have admitted that they would be 'amazed' if weapons of mass destruction (WMD) were found in Iraq. [...]
Now, however, according to the US official, pre-emptive action is justified against a nation which simply has the ability to develop unconventional weapons. Or which might be gaining the ability to develop said weapons. Or who the US thinks maybe might be thinking about it. And whoever the US happens to be pissed off at at any pont in time. This would be hilarious if weren't so frightening.
|
|
|