| Last modified: |
17/10/2004; 10:00:28
|
| Reckless Administration May Reap Disastrous Consequences: |
'This nation is about to embark upon the first test of a revolutionary doctrine applied in an extraordinary way at an unfortunate time. The doctrine of preemption -- the idea that the United States or any other nation can legitimately attack a nation that is not imminently threatening but may be threatening in the future -- is a radical new twist on the traditional idea of self defense. It appears to be in contravention of international law and the UN Charter. And it is being tested at a time of world-wide terrorism, making many countries around the globe wonder if they will soon be on our -- or some other nation's -- hit list.' -U.S. Senator Robert Byrd, Feb. 12, 2003
|
| On the road to losing the peace : |
'It was bad enough for the U.S. to have endured the intelligence failures that led to Sept. 11; it's another thing to know that 18 months, billions of dollars and untold numbers of bombs later that Osama bin Laden and most of his top advisers remain on the loose. This failure ought to be thrown daily in Mr. Bush's face, but he has diverted attention to Iraq, where the United States is about to make a mistake of historic proportions.' -Jeffrey Simpson in The Globe and Mail, 18 Feb 2003
|
|
|
Sunday, 19 September 2004
. .< 10:51:11 PM >
Blair: UK involved in new Iraq war
Tony Blair announced today that Britain was engaged in a "new Iraqi conflict", over a year after President Bush celebrated the end of hostilities aboard a US aircraft carrier. [Guardian Unlimited] Today's talks come after the publication of leaked documents suggesting that Mr Blair was warned a year before the invasion of meltdown in Iraq.
[snip]
And he appealed to those that opposed the war to see that now "there is only one side for sensible and decent people to be on in this conflict". Tony's toast. 'Sensible and decent people' would have acted sensibly and decently before they made matters far worse.
|
|
|