| Last modified: |
4/11/2004; 1:24:10
|
| NYT Endorses Kerry for President: |
|
"There is no denying that this race is mainly about Mr. Bush's disastrous tenure. Nearly four years ago, after the Supreme Court awarded him the presidency, Mr. Bush came into office amid popular expectation that he would acknowledge his lack of a mandate by sticking close to the center. Instead, he turned the government over to the radical right."
"We look back on the past four years with hearts nearly breaking, both for the lives unnecessarily lost and for the opportunities so casually wasted. Time and again, history invited George W. Bush to play a heroic role, and time and again he chose the wrong course. We believe that with John Kerry as president, the nation will do better." -- New York Times 17 Oct, 2004
|
| Reckless Administration May Reap Disastrous Consequences: |
'This nation is about to embark upon the first test of a revolutionary doctrine applied in an extraordinary way at an unfortunate time. The doctrine of preemption -- the idea that the United States or any other nation can legitimately attack a nation that is not imminently threatening but may be threatening in the future -- is a radical new twist on the traditional idea of self defense. It appears to be in contravention of international law and the UN Charter. And it is being tested at a time of world-wide terrorism, making many countries around the globe wonder if they will soon be on our -- or some other nation's -- hit list.' -U.S. Senator Robert Byrd, Feb. 12, 2003
|
| On the road to losing the peace : |
'It was bad enough for the U.S. to have endured the intelligence failures that led to Sept. 11; it's another thing to know that 18 months, billions of dollars and untold numbers of bombs later that Osama bin Laden and most of his top advisers remain on the loose. This failure ought to be thrown daily in Mr. Bush's face, but he has diverted attention to Iraq, where the United States is about to make a mistake of historic proportions.' -Jeffrey Simpson in The Globe and Mail, 18 Feb 2003
|
|
|
Sunday, 17 October 2004
The World According to Bush review (2004) Monde Selon Bush - Qwipster's Movie Reviews < 11:39:33 PM>. .
The story on William Karel's documentary, The World According to Bush, is that it was the alternate choice to Michael Moore's Fahrenheit 9/11 to be entered in the Cannes Film Festival for 2004. Both documentaries deal with similar subject matter, and discuss some of the same things about the man in the White House, his past ties, his current business interests, and his motivations for heading into war with Iraq. While Fahrenheit 9/11 would probably get the nod in terms of entertainment value, as most Moore documentaries have a good deal of humor and bombastic dialogue, Karel's is actually the superior film in terms of content and expertise as far as how to make a quality documentary, and utilizes its source material (most of what is included in the movie came from the writings of Eric Laurent) quite well with video footage and interviews.
I'm beginning to resent Moore.
The World According to Bush < 11:28:30 PM>. .
Never before in the history of the world's democracies have one man and his team acted with such arrogance and impunity, defying international law and creating an unprecedented grouping of interests: the project blends politics and personal interests in an atmosphere of total cynicism. The latest war against Iraq, with its totally unforeseeable consequences, hides another danger, that of seeing America launch further "civilizing" operations of a similar type, imposed by force, fired by ideas that are at best naïve and at worst totally hypocritical, calculated over a dangerously short term. Watching this now. This quote is from a page on the site of the company which made the film. You can watch a trailer for the film at this site. This is devestating stuff.
Court: War on Terror is no excuse to trample liberties < 2:28:03 PM>. .
Cory Doctorow:
Light sez, "This is an exceptionally cool - the Federal Circuit Court unanimously threw out the Georgia government's attempts to force protesters through metal detectors because the terror threat is elevated."
"We cannot simply suspend or restrict civil liberties until the War of Terror is over, because the War on Terror is unlikely ever to be truly over," Judge Gerald Tjoflat wrote for the three-member court. "September 11, 2001, already a day of immeasurable tragedy, cannot be the day liberty perished in this country."
Link
(Thanks, Light!)
[Via Boing Boing] The US is finally waking up from it's deep sleep.
The New York Times > Opinion > John Kerry for President < 2:33:35 AM>. .
There is no denying that this race is mainly about Mr. Bush's disastrous tenure. Nearly four years ago, after the Supreme Court awarded him the presidency, Mr. Bush came into office amid popular expectation that he would acknowledge his lack of a mandate by sticking close to the center. Instead, he turned the government over to the radical right.
Right on. The New York Times endorses Kerry. Let's get this mess over with an move back into the real world, one where extremists don't run the planet.
|
|
|