John Sequeira

Amped::Technology
John Sequeira's weblog: enterprise application development, typed weakly.

Friday, August 16, 2002


Tim O'Reilly Bashes Open Source Efforts in Govt [Slashdot]

There's another way to look at this. Open source is under fire from the stupid copy protection cripple-ware initiatives, and the record companies additionally want carte-blanche to pro-actively attack your machines. While I think the effort to force OSS down California's throat is severely misguided, the alternative seems to be try to rally the troops against the ever more intrusive efforts of big business to curtail fair use, and generally fence off the commons. Time to go on the offensive. It won't work, (I hope), but maybe it'll give big business pause the next time it considers sponsoring wildly unpopular, self-serving legislation (DMCA). Their actions haven't been viewed as poking a hornet's nest yet, but that tide may be turning.
7:10:48 PM      comment []  trackback []



Secure Linux OS seeks global dominance (ZDNet) [LWN.net]

Take that Palladium!
7:03:38 PM      comment []  trackback []



Paul Graham on Fighting Spam [Slashdot]

Interesting to think about combined Cloudmark's collaborative filtering with Paul's statistical approach. Why not use both, as long as your false positive rate stays low.
7:02:45 PM      comment []  trackback []



Hi, I'm Ray Ozzie...

http://www.ozzie.net/blog/2002/08/10.html

Hi, I'm Ray Ozzie. We didn't make Groove cross platform because it would have slowed us down too much. So for that reason, and the incidental one that we'd like to be aquired by Microsoft, we've opted to forego the approval and support of developers who like to learn things by looking at source code and just focus on selling software.

It's hard to really quibble with the logic - it's one that a lot of Groove shareholders would approve of. But there's a defensive tone in the writeup, one shared by Joel in his "Why we toed the MS line" [link] and Dave W. with his weekly "Open-Source-is-not-the-boss-of-me" posts. They want to be admired and accepted by the massive number of OSS developers because the people doing work there are really good, and they write a lot in public. It's not just a shallow, I want my peers to like me sentiment either. There's a huge amount of 'leverage' (Ozzie's term) to be had by making your offering interesting to the enterprise class OSS types who write and share their code and thoughts in blogs, building mindshare and evangelizing in the process. It's not just the folks who write the software, either (the ones Dave Winer is obsessed with). The service firms who take the software the final 10% of the way from a crude to a polished final deliverable are worth impressing, because as system integrators they direct IT spending.

Sun struck a balance and made things just open enough, and pulled of the timing by launching just when the world was dying for an alternative to MS. The economics continue to challenge Sun.

MS is trying for the same balance. They're launching WebMatrix this week at Linux World, which is a strategic carbon copy of both Sun and IBM's open source IDE initiatives. They've tried to hook the academics on taking Rotor for a spin, and gone through the ECMA motions to convince people that they their work is interesting despite indeterminent threat of patent/legal action.
8:06:58 AM      comment []  trackback []



SQL-UP: SQL Server Clustering tool

http://www.incepto.com/products.htm

This looks pretty cool. I haven't found transactional replication the smoothest approach to clustering. I wonder if it works?
7:58:40 AM      comment []  trackback []


© Copyright 2005 John Sequeira.
 
August 2002
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
        1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30 31
Jul   Sep

Click to see the XML version of this web page.
Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.
Yahoo: johnseq2
MSN: john_seq@hotmail.com
AIM: amped02139
Skype: johnjulian