Jinn of Quality and Risk


Jinn?
According to critics, an eavesdropper, constantly striving to go behind the curtain of heaven in order to steal divine secrets. Grants wishes.
Translate!
fr | pt | es | de | it
Projects
Write a book, quickly. Read, more. Sleep, less. Travel in Europe and America, v.soon. Find a job, again.
Bio?
Species: featherless biped, chocolate addict
Roots: born in Sweden — lived also in Switzerland, USA, UK — good genes from Sweden, Norway, India, Germany
Languages: French, English, Swedish, German, Portuguese, Latin, Ada, Perl, Java, assembly language, Pascal, C/C++, etc.
Jobs: factory worker, farmhand, supermarket cleaner, programmer, language lawyer, soldier, lecturer, software engineer, consultant, director of technology, solutions architect, programme manager, methodology lead, quality and risk manager, writer

2002-05-01 [this day]

Science vs The American Public

The NSF has published a study of American illiteracy in science and technology — Science and Technology: Public Attitudes and Public Understanding. Here are some shocking highlights of how few people correctly identified facts (based on "true or false" questions):
  • Lasers do not work by focusing sound waves (45% correct)
  • Light travels faster than sound (77%)
  • Earth takes one year to go around the Sun (54%)
  • The father's gene decides whether the baby is a boy or a girl (65%)
  • Antibiotics do not kill viruses (50%)

Only 22% of respondents were able to define "molecule", and 45% gave an acceptable definition for DNA. Further, 45% of Americans agree with the statement: "God created human beings pretty much in their present form at one time within the last 10,000 years or so" (Gallup poll, February 2001); 68% favor teaching this belief (known as creationism) along with evolution in public schools.

Given the high percentage of false answers, it is likely that a large proportion of respondents were merely guessing — for instance, people who did not complete high school averaged 50% correct answers, which is consistent with random guessing! Thus the proportion of people who actually know the scientific facts is probably even lower than indicated... It is bizarre that the report does not point this out. Similar studies conducted in Europe seem to indicate that the overall situation is worse there.

A largely ignorant population votes to select their "leaders" — who vote to control what research and development is allowed (gene therapy, nuclear power, space exploration, etc.). What a deal. [this item]

Archives
May 2002
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31  
Apr   Jun
What is this?
A polymorphic publication on quality, risk, and other gems. A weblog, pushing the boundaries of knowledge sharing. An experiment created with an utterly distributed, informal, flexible, independent, and scalable tool — better, faster, cheaper, and smarter...
myDashboard
Delenda est. Sic tempus fugit. Ad baculum, ad hominem, ad nauseamque. Non sequitur.