| |
|
Thursday, April 11, 2002
|
|
Simon Fell: "Microsoft, I.B.M. and VeriSign to Cooperate on Web Security. Microsoft, I.B.M. and VeriSign plan to announce a new technical approach that they hope will ensure greater security and thus stimulate commercial development of Web services. By Steve Lohr. [New York Times: Technology] Sounds like there's going to be a new version of WS-Security coming down the pipe."
IBM developerWorks
This is a new Web Services security proposal that combines the SOAP-SEC and WS-Security/WS-License stuff that was out before.
[Snell's Blog]
This is a very imortant spec for Web Services to be real, commercial products.
9:42:28 PM 
|
|
I hate to quote the Inquirer, err Register, on anyhting but this does support what our group understood about the Lucovsky changes and group realignment. MS pulls the plugs on Hailstorm, pending rethink. Is it our imagination or in the .NET vision shrinking? [The Register]
But of course, the Inquirer, err Register, has to put an anti-end-of-of-Microsoft slant on it-) No, its because the market spoke and they listened and are changing their strategy from a more proprietary one to one based completly on standards: WS_SECURITY, etc - GXA
8:24:49 AM
|
|
Simon says(-)): Microsoft, I.B.M. and VeriSign to Cooperate on Web Security. Microsoft, I.B.M. and VeriSign plan to announce a new technical approach that they hope will ensure greater security and thus stimulate commercial development of Web services. By Steve Lohr. [New York Times: Technology] Sounds like there's going to be a new version of WS-Security coming down the pipe. [Simon Fell]
Boy, is this ever needed. I see so many of these kind of blockers even within the company, never mind going outside. The VeriSign name is goodness for it too. Its a trusted name within many companies.
8:13:50 AM
|
|
|
© Copyright 2002 Sam Gentile.
Last update: 7/1/2002; 9:34:55 PM.
|
|
|
