Updated: 7/7/06; 9:09:18 PM.
Connectivity: Spike Hall's RU Weblog
News, clips, comments on knowledge, knowledge-making, education, weblogging, philosophy, systems and ecology.
        

 Saturday, September 13, 2003

Summary: Sebastian Fiedler reminds us that world building and rebuilding are outcomes of profound learning experiences. I add Piaget and System Theory and Alethic Truths and refer to wisdom along the way. [entry has been retitled-- from Rebuilding Personal Worlds-- and edited since first publication]

In a recent entry , Seb Fiedler, reminds us that learning, as it should be delivered, must be more than a sincere and effective effort to add data , yet one more file card, to a stack (for clever regurgitation at some future authority-pleasing exercise). He quotes Robert Grudin's work in "the grace of great things" in part as follows:

Whatever ther subject matter or style, true teachers always convey the sense that the communication of an art demands of the student not only effort and attention but cathartic psychological change. To learn is not merely to accumulate data; it is to rebuild one's world...


Seb goes on to ask whether (hope that ) personal weblogging might give each of us better access to the teachers who will help us rebuild our [individual] worlds.
I share the wish and agree that those few times I've had a 'real' teacher in my life I remember. Why? Because of the sense of deep, enabling transformation that came from the experience.

I have a few ideas about rebuilding worlds, however, which make our 'world', the one we're building together, more complex.

  • First notion: the world we build as scientists and scholars isn't all that orderly or symetrical, but, I claim, it's the most orderly of the worlds in which we participate. The worlds of intracultural understanding -- "common sense", let's say, and the world of intrapersonal space are less so, built in layers rather than starting from a clean slate; each culture, each individual has artifacts from prior experiences and existential states that occasionally surface and sometimes play a part in new experience--somewhat inconsistent and out of place but dressed up with a new name. Jumping to broad cultural experience for an example, some biblical archeologists (Old Testament, New Testament--if you insist I will go look them up!) contend that present day devils are the gods of absorbed and conquered civilizations. In parallel fashion small groups, families and individuals have quirky ways that come from the presence of renamed artifacts and assumptions and attitudes from prior states of existence. Enough said, I hope, to set up the next point.

  • Second point : Given the complexity of personal worlds and the inaccessibility of major components for resorting, rebuilding a personal world is no easy thing.The last thing we are likely to do is to rebuild from the bottom up. If we can liken a personal world to a 7 room house that started out as a small shack which was added onto one room at a time, rebuilding our personal world is like remodelling the most recent addition. And -- sticking with the metaphor, since we've been spending much of our time there recently, we do feel as if our world has been transformed when a powerful teacher enters our life and helps us change furniture, put down a new floor or enhance the lighting. Rebuilding our world is generally speaking more like remodeling than it is a literal reconstruction from the bare earth up.
  • Third thought: in an earlier entry I mentioned Piagetian (and Systems Theory) notions of learning as follows:
    Interestingly systems thinkers, developmental psychologists and Dewey concur (though using somewhat different vocabulary) that learning occurs because of disequilibrium. Piaget, for example, mentions assimilation and accommodation as constant tidal process which influence individual becoming. One process tends to map one's expectations onto the environment until the environment no longer does 'the right thing'...even if corrected (via what some call 'negative feedback'). This mapping onto the environment is called assimilation.
    The disequilibrium phase.. when a series of corrections fail to achieve their goal (to get the environment to fall in line with present expections) .. is followed at some point by a form of capitulation... the learning system then opens up to the environment and tries out new sets of expectations and accompanying actions. These tryouts occur successively until the environmental response once again meets [a different, more sophisticated, generally] expectation. This trying out of successive expectation/action combinations is called accommodation.

    What has been referred to as adding more data I am interpreting as assimilation -- using already mastered environmental control strategies (aka negative feedback) to get the environment back in line -- basically staying the same, not changing or remodeling one's world. The true teacher has to provide experience that will have the learner incapable of making experience still fit the old scheme- thus the student must enter anaccommodationphase which results in remodeled view of life.

    Final thought: the remodeling can be large or small. When I think of major efforts (again, realization of potential is, to me another issue) at remodeling I don't think of new slip covers or a better faucet on the sink, I think of redirecting and reoutfitting-- using , of course, as much of the old furniture and old paint as possible. In short, world building should be BIG.

    Big means an integrated set of truths which, if mastered, might well change one's world-view. Such truth's Roy Bhaskar has called alethic truth(s)

    This is the true world of forms, which account in all their complex, manifold and mediated determinations for all the phenomena of what identity theorists are pleased to call the sensate ... and non-sensate world." (Dialectic: The pulse of freedom, p. 164 via Ruth Groff, in Philosophy of the Social Sciences, September 2000, p. 407)
    Alethic truths are, in short,those that are deep causes-- supra truths which undergird,encompass and affect lesser or supplementary truths.
    • System Theory/Cybernetics
    • Psychoanalytic Theory
    • Behaviorism
    • Buddhist principles of living
    • Germ Theory of Diseases and Treatment
    • Astrological Analysis of Character in Context of a Multiphased Life (hey... don't get uppity ... it is a comprehensive world-view)
    • Constitutional System of Government
    • Energic Theory of Diseases and Treatment (as existing in meridians of accupuncture, shiatsu, accupressure, etc.)
    • Newtonian Physics
    I think you get the idea. If any of these were learned and applied in the course of individual or community life you can expect that a sense ofworld change would be involved. Further, I believe that wisdom is more likely develop within the context of these thought systems than in a one-concept-as-demanded-at-a-time. But, to put a fine point on it, acquiring a complex thought system is not the same as becoming 'wise'

    Now if we only could match world-change-level of learning with a great analysis of individual potential so that when the world change occurs it translates as a fuller and higher expression of that individual's .(see prior entry for a fuller explanation of actuality and potentiality.)


  • Click here to visit the Radio UserLand website.

    Subscribe to "Connectivity: Spike Hall's RU Weblog" in Radio UserLand.

    Click to see the XML version of this web page.

    Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.

     

    September 2003
    Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1 2 3 4 5 6
    7 8 9 10 11 12 13
    14 15 16 17 18 19 20
    21 22 23 24 25 26 27
    28 29 30        
    Aug   Oct

    GeoURL



    Spike Hall is an Emeritus Professor of Education and Special Education at Drake University. He teaches most of his classes online. He writes in Des Moines, Iowa.


    Google

    Article Feeds from Guest Blogger(s):


    My BlogLinker Connections:/
    Creative Commons License
    This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.