|
A consultant here pointed out the netstat command on Windows 2000. Shows network connections. Helpful. 2:31:52 PM |
|
Caffeine May Reduce Alzheimers. I'll just get rid of the smirk on my face right now as I load up the elephant mug with another cup-o-joe. One paragraph in the article fires off a fun memory:
A report from the faculty of medicine in Lisbon, Portugal, which conducted the research, said: "If confirmed, this finding should have a major impact on the prevention of alzheimers disease." Lisbon, Portugal is where I drank the strongest cup of coffee I've ever had. If memory serves (this was the 1986 trip), a "cup of coffee" in Portugal gets you an unbelievablely strong espresso called a "bica" and came with a sugar packet as big as the cup. Forget all these lame "extreme caffeine" drinks, a bica will blow your head clean off faster than a Scanner. [via Slashdot] [a joshua tree in every pot...]12:00:23 PM |
|
This strikes me as an amazingly forward-thinking act on the part of a CIO. (I was about to say that non-IT employees should be encouraged to participate, but this group has 900 IT employees...ours group is a handful. Nine-hundred k-loggers is a sizable community on its own.) An Open Offer to Utah State IT Employees. 11:58:51 AM |
|
Great posting on distributed systems and standards. If I read the commentary correctly:
Clemens Vasters: "Arrogance is a design pattern for asynchronously decoupled systems. "If you give me an XML schema and the data I give you is valid according to that schema, it's your problem and job to process it properly. Not mine." Synchronicity is for people who worry too much about other people's problems. If a remote system fails processing data that was perfectly valid according to its own rules, what are you doing with that returned failure code? Panic? Call your mom?" The general philosophy of distributed application development on the Net is that everyone needs to handle their own end of the equation and if they don't, too bad. I'm holding up my end. My application works. If your's doesn't, that's your problem. At the same time however, Nash's equilibrium still holds true. I'm going to implement my application based on standards and provide all of the information I can to help you make sure your end can work with mine. [snellspace] 11:51:12 AM |
| Georgia Tech's portal project, and how extreme programming and interaction design might help
Lengthy post on Extreme Programming, and Alan Cooper's Interaction Design that I've truncated...but I encourage you to read the original. Georgia Tech's portal project, and how extreme programming and interaction design might help. 11:41:13 AM |
|
I'm not going to truncate this feed anymore. After championing truncating your RSS feed to the first paragraph, I'm going back to an untruncated RSS feed. Truncation works very well if you write like a reporter. If you get everything important into that first paragraph, folks can decide if they want to click further. But sometimes I feel more like telling stories than reporting the news. And in that case, it's very hard to get everything you want to say into that first 'graph.
This was brought home to me this week. I put in an item about the emotional risk you take when you decide to share your blog/klog with others. The first 'graph was very short, but at least one person took the trouble to read further, and found something of value in the next to last paragraph.
If I had a choice, I suppose I'd like a mechanism that would let me specify whether or not to abridge my blog entry into something shorter for my RSS feed. But since part of the point of this weblog is offer things that others might be interested in, I'll try sending out an unfiltered feed again. [Paul Holbrook's Radio Weblog]11:39:03 AM |
|
An astounding article, courtesy of Curiouser and curiouser!. I've added a few emphases below, but this quotation stuns me by explaining the “pull” of individuals I've encountered over the years who fit the “Narcissist” category (or—at least—approach the description): A dozen years ago, the psychologists Robert Hogan, Robert Raskin, and Dan Fazzini wrote a brilliant essay called "The Dark Side of Charisma." It argued that flawed managers fall into three types. One is the High Likability Floater, who rises effortlessly in an organization because he never takes any difficult decisions or makes any enemies. Another is the Homme de Ressentiment, who seethes below the surface and plots against his enemies. The most interesting of the three is the Narcissist, whose energy and self-confidence and charm lead him inexorably up the corporate ladder. Narcissists are terrible managers. They resist accepting suggestions, thinking it will make them appear weak, and they don't believe that others have anything useful to tell them. "Narcissists are biased to take more credit for success than is legitimate," Hogan and his co-authors write, and "biased to avoid acknowledging responsibility for their failures and shortcomings for the same reasons that they claim more success than is their due." Moreover:The posting that drew my attention to this:Narcissists typically make judgments with greater confidence than other people . . . and, because their judgments are rendered with such conviction, other people tend to believe them and the narcissists become disproportionately more influential in group situations. Finally, because of their self-confidence and strong need for recognition, narcissists tend to "self-nominate"; consequently, when a leadership gap appears in a group or organization, the narcissists rush to fill it.
How *not* to succeed at Consulting. 10:48:54 AM |
| Novell and “Digital Identity”
Novell chooses its Destiny well. Of all the announcements relating to digital identity this week, the most impressive so far has been Novell's, which ... [Loosely Coupled weblog] 10:26:55 AM |

