Radio Free Blogistan] QUOTE
Weblogged Conversation: Slow Academic Adoption of Weblogs. Seb closes the loop on an interesting multi-weblog conversation about why weblogs have not (yet?) been widely adoped by academics as a research tool:
Stephen over at Blogging Alone mentions Sébastien Paquet's reasons why blogging has failed to become a widely accepted research tool among academia. I disagree with nearly all of these reasons. Below is the list of reasons and my thoughts based on my own experiences:
Follow the link to Seb's summary to get the whole flow of the dialogue. UNQUOTE [Radio Free Blogistan] I inserted into quoting the link to Stephen context.
The flow of the dialogue is not yet clear to me, but I get the drift of it.
I will agree that a lot of people have valid concerns about Privacy on the Internet, and the risk that someone will steal their ideas, if they prematurely share them through the Weblogging medium.
I believe that Weblogging Technology documentation is mainly aimed at people who are not only Computer Literate, but somewhat experienced in tinkering with how things work on their screens. In other professions than computing developers, there are many people who lack this attribute. They just want to use the software. You do not have to know how to change a tire or tune an engine to drive a car - when it needs service you take it to the experts. When TV set or Telephone is broke, either call repairman or buy a new one. There are computer users who want that from their computer experience. Thus it is perfectly legitimate for such people to complain about the learning curve.
I agree that it is easier to publish through some time honored template, even when some new template might be be better suited for the work, especially when there are other players, like employers, who need to approve the new template.
I think that scientists seek to figure out how things work, then engineers apply the results in the real world. Scientists propose a theory to explain the evidence, then come up with experiments to test the theory. Developers have similar approach, by coming up with ways to test new software and changes to software. In that sense, computer people are a mixture of scientist and engineer, but computer science in the real world is still like an artist crafting something. I doubt that I understand social scientists well enought to comment on how they fit into that picture.
1:18:39 PM
|