Updated: 9/9/02; 3:16:36 AM.
Due Process
        

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury...nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law.

In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defense.

In suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise reexamined in any Court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law.

Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.

The fundamental right to Due Process, expressed in the fourth, fifth, sixth, seventh, and eigth articles of the Bill of Rights are designed to assure the fundamental fairness of criminal justice procedures. Due process was one of the most important freedoms for early Americans: Samuel Adams asserted that American anger toward at-will general searches by British troops to be "the Commencement of the Controversy between Great Britain and America." (Levy, Original Intent, 227-8; Glasser 166) Due process rights are constantly challenged by the suggestion that they are only a refuge for the guilty and a roadblock to effective law enforcement. Actually, due process laws protect the innocent by maintaining a standard of fairness and consistant procedure of investigations and trials. Unfortunately, due process protections and the professional procedures they protect are constantly eroding: the FBI, which overzealously investigated law-abiding Americans in the 1960's (?), has most recently been given free-reign again through the "anti-terrorist" USA-PATRIOT act.

Monday, September 9, 2002

Arlington TX Police Requesting Thumbprints for Checks

Arlington Texas police proposed Operation Thumbs Up, a voluntary initiative for local merchants to collect thumb prints with checks, as a deterrent to forgery. This has a couple of civil liberties and privacy implications:

It highlights the growing problem of identity theft. Unfortunately, identity theft cannot be solved by the seemingly perfect solution of biological identifiers, such as fingerprints, because identity theft can actually involve several intervening forms of identification that eventually associate a fingerprint with a different identity. This process can easily begin with a social security number, which is supposed to be very private but is in fact requested by businesses regularly. Identity theft is practically a difficult crime to prevent, but the solution is implausible unless it keeps identity more private, not less.

It also mentions the growing problem of surveillance databases, which in this case is a database of citizen fingerprints. Without this type of database, collecting fingerprints with checks is almost useless. Unfortunately, like many other databases used by the police and other government departments, they do not take into account the due process rights of the citizens whose records are being added or modified. [Fort Worth Star-Telegram and Privacy Digest]
3:16:09 AM    


Thursday, September 5, 2002

Louise Roback and William Schneider on Freedom and Security

In a pair of articles in the Press-Herald on Monday, Louise Roback, the new executive director of the MCLU, and William Schneider, the lead homeland security prosecutor in the Maine Federal AG's office, addressed homeland security due process issues.

Schneider: "We can fight any terrorist organization and any threat within the guidelines of the Constitution . . . the more we have to sacrifice civil liberties, the more the terrorists will win"

Roback: "People say, 'Well, I don't see my rights are threatened, so whatever the government needs to do is fine.' But once the balance shifts, you don't get those rights back. That's why we should care."
12:36:58 AM    


Saturday, August 31, 2002

3 Justices Call for Reviewing Death Sentences for Juveniles

In an unusual dissent from an order declining to stay an execution, three Supreme Court justices urged the court to reconsider allowing juveniles to be sentenced to death. By Adam Liptak. [New York Times: Politics]
6:14:14 PM    


Wednesday, August 28, 2002

The Failures of Technological Security

This collection of articles from the Atlantic Monthly highlights the dangers of relying on technological solutions to America's post-9/11 security needs, especially those that invade our civil liberties. The articles all note in particular that there is valid tradeoff between liberty and security-- except that this technology does not provide real security.

"The trick is to remember that technology can't save you.... We know this in our own lives. We realize that there's no magic anti-burglary dust we can sprinkle on our cars to prevent them from being stolen. We know that car alarms don't offer much protection. The Club at best makes burglars steal the car next to you. For real safety we park on nice streets where people notice if somebody smashes the window. Or we park in garages, where somebody watches the car. In both cases people are the essential security element. You always build the system around people."

The danger to our civil liberty and livelihood is also pointed out in the context of biometric ID cards:

"For the purposes of a national ID card, identity is a unique, unchanging set of distinguishing characteristics: the flecks in one's iris, the ridges of one's left thumb.... As Americans, though, we have a higher identity: free agent, self-legislator, citizen. It's a common identity held individually. It's what allows us to bond and make a nation or, if necessary, dissolve our bonds. This identity can't be captured on a card, but there is a risk it could be supplanted by one."

These articles should be taken into consideration of the Deering High School ID Badges.
2:30:49 PM    


American Library Association: The USA-Patriot Act

The American Library Association has posted a collection of information about the investigative provisions of the USA-Patriot Act. The collection is intended to be a guide for librarians, but is also very useful for library users interested in the impact on their privacy and due process rights. [From the Scout Report]
2:02:56 PM    

And Now, The Secret Appeals Court...

[Following the Secret Intelligence Court's rebuff of the Justice Dept...]

The nation's super-secret intelligence appeals court has been asked to make a ruling on the extent of the police powers that should be granted to the Justice Department. By Philip Shenon. [New York Times: National]
2:02:35 AM    


Man Freed After DNA Clears Him of Murder

Eddie Joe Lloyd had confessed to the rape and murder of a sixteen year old girl in 1984. He had made his confession while being evaluated in a mental hospital and says that he had made it in order to help the police capture the real killer.

Eddie Joe Lloyd, on capital punishment: "I consider myself lucky.... Seventeen years? If Michigan had the death penalty, I would have been through, the angels would have sung a long time ago."

Judge Leonard Townsend, overturning the conviction: "I have never heard this gentleman say, `I didn't do it,' or, `They forced me to say it.' Even though he might have lied about what he did, the fault falls on him. The fault lies with no one else."

Judge Townsend, convicting Lloyd, 1985: "The sentence that the statute requires is inadequate. The only justifiable sentence, I would say, would be termination by extreme constriction."

[New York Times: National]
1:27:03 AM    


Court Backs Open Deportation Hearings in Terror Cases

A federal appeals court ruled on Monday that the Bush administration acted unlawfully in holding hundreds of terror-related deportation hearings in secret. [Excerpts from decision.] By Adam Liptak. [New York Times: National]
1:14:09 AM    

Deering High Requires Photo Badges

Deering High School will be requiring students to wear photo badges at all times this upcoming school year. Although the school is seeking to protect students and improve security, the photo badges will not realistically protect the school from intruders. Students will also be losing the opportunity to learn about their rights to privacy and due process.
12:02:15 AM    


Friday, August 23, 2002

FBI Misled Intelligence Court to Avoid Fourth Amendment

The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, a secret court which approves FBI electronic surveillance requests, said that it was misled "an alarming number of times" in 2001 and 2002 on the intentions of FBI surveillance requests. Under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, the FBI has a much lower evidence standard to request a surveillance warrant to be used for counter intelligence purposes, but the information they gather cannot be used for any domestic criminal investigation. The court said that it was frequently misled by the FBI that this "wall of separation" between counterintelligence and criminal investigations was being maintained.

Surprisingly, the court actually praised the Ashcroft Justice department for cleaning up these abuses, but the court had also rejected the Justice department's request earlier this year to circumvent the FISA protections, saying that the request was not reasonably designed to protect Americans' privacy.

The full opinion is also available. [PDF, link from The Washington Post and Slashdot.] [New York Times: National]
3:34:41 PM    


Sunday, August 18, 2002

NASA Developing Brainwave Screening for Airports

NASA is developing computer systems to identify "likely terrorists" by heart rates and ultimately brainwave patterns. EPIC gained information through a FOIA request of the initiative to add so-called "non-invasive neuro-electric sensors" to the pre-existing Computer Assisted Passenger Pre-screening System (CAPPS) already being used to profile air travelers. Though the system raises due process and privacy concerns, as testing brainwave and heart rate patters would likely constitute a search, the Washington Times article points out that airports have generally had lower due process standards. [Daypop Top News Stories and The Washington Times]
9:32:59 PM    

Ohio Judge Rules Out Death Penalty Because of Defense Costs

Ohio Judge Jeffrey Simmons told prosecutors that they could not seek the death penalty because of the burden the expensive defense would put on the county. The higher cost of providing for a death penalty defense comes from the higher due process protections given to defendants. [The New York Times]
9:31:15 AM    


Saturday, August 17, 2002

ACLU of Texas testifies against racially biased investigation

"In testimony today before state lawmakers, the American Civil Liberties Union blasted Texas Attorney General John Cornyn for failing to investigate a series of phony drug busts that led to the arrest of nearly 10 percent of the black residents of a small town in Texas."
7:55:39 PM    


© Copyright 2002 Lucas Burke.
 
September 2002
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30          
Aug   Oct

Due Process

Top 10 hits for free speech maine on..
Google
1.WebActive: Free Speech Radio News
2.UMaine Free Speech and Assembly Policy
3.University of Maine Employee Information and Resource Guide Table ...
4.Libertarian Party of Maine WEB Page
5.Swans Commentary: The Real Freedom of Free Speech - Scott Nearing ...
6.Senate Vote on S. 652 - Internet Censorship - Free Speech -- ...
7.Free Expression Network: Schools 2000
8.Recent Free Speech Victories in Federal Courts
9.USM Philosophy Department Homepage
10.| Roosevelt Speech - Maine Humanities Council |

Help link 9/9/02; 3:16:46 AM.

Click here to visit the Radio UserLand website.

Subscribe to "Due Process" in Radio UserLand.

Click to see the XML version of this web page.

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.