The Trademark Blog : from the law offices of Schwimmer and Associates
Updated: 7/8/2004; 3:06:39 PM.

 

Contact Schwimmer Legal

About Martin Schwimmer

International Trademark Metasearch (closed for maintenance)

Domain Dossier

ccTLD Information

Click to see the XML version of this web page.

Creative Commons License

This site's contents does not constitute legal advice, nor is it intended to create an attorney/client relationship. Consult an attorney, early and often.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

 
 

Tuesday, June 18, 2002


I Want To Shoo-oo-oot the Whole Day Down

PWC Consulting is changing its name to MONDAY.  If you have a better name, please hit the envelope button to the left and send it in.  Best entry so far: HACKY SACK FRIDAY.

Update: I am not endorsing this parody site, just providing a link to it.

 

1:11:30 PM    



I Would Use The Internet To Express Myself But I Couldn't Get The Right Domain Name

Other Icann-watchers are targeting Esther Dyson's column in yesterday's Wall Street Journal for various quotes such as "ICANN is weak and powerless" (this from ICANN's first chairman).  I'm puzzled by this one: "ICANN can control not so much freedom of speech as freedom of presence of the Internet."

I don't know what Ms. Dyson is referring to as "freedom of presence" but it seems to me that affordable and unfettered availability of Internet access is a lot more critical to "presence" than domain names and until people can access the Internet without bolting the door, then we're focusing on the wrong aspect of the issue.

 

12:25:51 PM    



More Rights in GIVENCHY than GIVENCHY itself?
Strange blurb in the National Law Journal.  Givenchy (a sub of LVMH) owns US registrations for GIVENCHY for perfumes and watches.  Time Products alleges it has the rights to import and distribute GIVENCHY waches in the US (presumably from Givenchy's European watch manufacturer).  Givenchy distributed watches in the US as a giveaway with a purchase of GIVENCHY perfume.  Time Products has now brought suit in Florida alleging that LVMH has distributed "imitation and/or counterfeit" products.  I see how a trademark owner could in theory breach a sole and exclusive license.  I don't see how a trademark owner can sell imitations or counterfeits of its own product.  If I'm missing something, write me. 12:05:19 PM    


© Copyright 2004 Martin Schwimmer.



Click here to visit the Radio UserLand website.

 


June 2002
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
            1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30            
May   Jul

Google


trademark.blog.us
whole web