June 2003
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30          
May   Jul


For more search options, please see the Advanced search form and the section of the User's Guide, Tips for Searching PULSE.


C H A N N E L S
• PULSE Home Page
• EXECUTIVE EDITION

• US News
• Canada News
• UK News
• New Zealand News

• Consumer Advocacy
• Health Care Systems
• Managed Care/Medicaid
• Co-occurring Disorders
• Clinical studies
• Pharmaceutical News
• Criminal Justice Systems
• Legislative News


U S E R ' S   G U I D E
About PULSE
PULSE Channels
Archives
Adding comments
Using the # link
Items that require registration
PULSE syndication
Tips for Searching PULSE


E M A I L   S U B S C R I P T I O N S

For WEEKLY summaries of PULSE postings, see the weekly email subscription form.

For DAILY mailings (powered by Bloglet), please enter your e-mail address below:


P U B L I C A T I O N S

PULSE ANNUAL No. 2
January 2003

Recent Trends, Challenges and Issues in Funding Public Mental Health Services in the US
March 2002

PULSE ANNUAL No. 1
October 2001

 

PULSE is powered by
Radio Userland.

Listed on BlogShares

© Bill Davis, 2000-2003.

About PULSE | Channels | User's Guide | Email subscriptions | Publications




PULSE is a free service of the Centre for Community Change International, gathering new and noteworthy Internet resources for mental health providers, family members of individuals with mental illness, consumers of mental health services and consumer advocates. PULSE is researched, edited and designed by Bill Davis.



daily link  Tuesday, June 17, 2003


Supreme Court Allows Defendant's Forced Medication
Reuters story at Yahoo News - "A divided U.S. Supreme Court (news - web sites) ruled on Monday that the government may force defendants to take anti-psychotic medicine to make them competent to stand trial on serious criminal charges, but only under certain limited circumstances. By a 6-3 vote, the court allowed forced medication if the treatment was medically appropriate, substantially unlikely to have side effects that may undermine the trial's fairness, necessary to further important governmental trial-related interests and less intrusive alternatives were unavailable."  
permalink