| March 2005 | ||||||
| Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat |
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 |
| 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 |
| 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | ||
| Feb Apr | ||||||
For more search options, please see the Advanced search form and the section of the User's Guide, Tips for Searching PULSE.
C H A N N E L S
• PULSE Home
Page
•
EXECUTIVE
EDITION
•
US News
•
Canada
News
•
UK News
•
New
Zealand News
•
Consumer
Advocacy
•
Health
Care Systems
•
Managed
Care/Medicaid
•
Co-occurring
Disorders
•
Clinical
studies
•
Pharmaceutical
News
•
Criminal
Justice Systems
•
Legislative
News
U S E R ' S G
U I D E
About
PULSE
PULSE Channels
Archives
Adding comments
Using the # link
Items that require registration
PULSE syndication
Tips for Searching PULSE
E M A I L S
U B S C R I P T I O N S
For WEEKLY summaries
of PULSE postings, see the weekly
email subscription form.
For DAILY mailings (powered
by Bloglet), please enter your e-mail address below:
PULSE ANNUAL No. 2
January 2003
Recent
Trends, Challenges and Issues in Funding Public Mental Health Services
in the US
March 2002
PULSE ANNUAL No. 1
October 2001
PULSE is powered by
Radio Userland.
© Bill Davis, 2000-2003.
![]()
Mental health centers debated (Maryland) Delmarva Daily Times story - "A new law that would open wider the doors to Maryland's state-run mental health centers was both praised and disparaged in Annapolis on Wednesday. The legislation has the backing of several Eastern Shore lawmakers. If signed into law, it would give families of developmentally disabled people more leeway to place them in residential institutions like Salisbury's Holly Center. There are an estimated 7,600 people in Maryland waiting to be placed into sought-after smaller group homes and other treatment centers. The state, citing U.S. Supreme Court rulings that counsel against institutionalization most of the time, has for years been reluctant to place patients in the four state-run facilities still in operation."
Senate passes parity in mental health coverage (Oregon) Register-Guard editorial - "There will come a time when people will shake their heads in disbelief upon hearing that mental health was once considered less important than physical health. The Oregon Senate did its part to hasten that day with a bipartisan vote Monday that requires insurers to cover mental illness and substance abuse the same way they cover physical ailments. With five Republicans joining all 18 Democrats, the Senate voted 23-6 to send Oregonians an overdue signal that the stigmatizing disparity in insurance coverage must be eliminated. Now it's up to the Republican-dominated House to follow suit, allowing Oregon to become the 35th state that requires some form of parity between mental health and physical health coverage. The bill faces a hard road in the House, where powerful opponents in the insurance industry and the business lobby will do their best to damn the measure with faint praise..."![]()