June 2004 | ||||||
Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat |
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 |
20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 |
27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | |||
May Jul |
For more search options, please see the Advanced search form and the section of the User's Guide, Tips for Searching PULSE.
C H A N N E L S
• PULSE Home
Page
•
EXECUTIVE
EDITION
•
US News
•
Canada
News
•
UK News
•
New
Zealand News
•
Consumer
Advocacy
•
Health
Care Systems
•
Managed
Care/Medicaid
•
Co-occurring
Disorders
•
Clinical
studies
•
Pharmaceutical
News
•
Criminal
Justice Systems
•
Legislative
News
U S E R ' S G
U I D E
About
PULSE
PULSE Channels
Archives
Adding comments
Using the # link
Items that require registration
PULSE syndication
Tips for Searching PULSE
E M A I L S
U B S C R I P T I O N S
For WEEKLY summaries
of PULSE postings, see the weekly
email subscription form.
For DAILY mailings (powered
by Bloglet), please enter your e-mail address below:
PULSE ANNUAL No. 2
January 2003
Recent
Trends, Challenges and Issues in Funding Public Mental Health Services
in the US
March 2002
PULSE ANNUAL No. 1
October 2001
PULSE is powered by
Radio Userland.
© Bill Davis, 2000-2003.
Editorials Respond to Supreme Court Decision on Suing HMOs
Item in the Kaiser Daily Health Policy Report reviewing press reactions to the Supreme Court decision last week - "Several newspaper editorials recently examined the unanimous Supreme Court decision last week that patients cannot file suit against HMOs in state court when they experience injuries as a result of administrative decisions related to treatment. In the case, which involved a 1997 Texas law, two state residents separately filed suit in state court against their HMOs, Aetna and Cigna, over allegations that the companies made decisions related to treatment that resulted in injuries. However, the Supreme Court ruled that the federal Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 preempts state laws that allow patients to file such lawsuits..."![]()