February 2005
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
    1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28          
Jan   Mar


For more search options, please see the Advanced search form and the section of the User's Guide, Tips for Searching PULSE.


C H A N N E L S
PULSE Home Page
EXECUTIVE EDITION

US News
Canada News
UK News
New Zealand News

Consumer Advocacy
Health Care Systems
Managed Care/Medicaid
Co-occurring Disorders
Clinical studies
Pharmaceutical News
Criminal Justice Systems
Legislative News


U S E R ' S   G U I D E
About PULSE
PULSE Channels

Archives

Adding comments

Using the # link

Items that require registration

PULSE syndication

Tips for Searching PULSE


E M A I L   S U B S C R I P T I O N S

For WEEKLY summaries of PULSE postings, see the weekly email subscription form.

For DAILY mailings (powered by Bloglet), please enter your e-mail address below:


P U B L I C A T I O N S

PULSE ANNUAL No. 2
January 2003

Recent Trends, Challenges and Issues in Funding Public Mental Health Services in the US
March 2002

PULSE ANNUAL No. 1
October 2001

 

PULSE is powered by
Radio Userland
.

Listed on BlogShares

© Bill Davis, 2000-2003.

About PULSE | Channels | User's Guide | Email subscriptions | Publications




PULSE is a free service of the Centre for Community Change International, gathering new and noteworthy Internet resources for mental health providers, family members of individuals with mental illness, consumers of mental health services and consumer advocates. PULSE is researched, edited and designed by Bill Davis.



daily link  Thursday, February 10, 2005


Making Medicaid a Block Grant Program: An Analysis of the Implications of Past Proposals A report, in Adobe Acrobat format, by Jeanne Lambrew of George Washington University commissioned by the Kaiser Commission on Medicaid and the Uninsured - "In 2003, President Bush proposed converting Medicaid from an entitlement to a block grant program. Similar ideas from President Reagan in 1981 and Congress in 1995 were introduced but not enacted. Block grants aim to provide greater federal budget certainty and a stronger state incentive to contain program costs. This paper compares the preestablished funding levels proposed in 1981 and 1995 with what actually happened to federal Medicaid spending. Its results show that previous block grant proposals’ funding levels at the national and state levels were quite different from what was anticipated and what occurred. As a result, Medicaid probably could not—and cannot—maintain existing health coverage under a block grant financing structure."  
permalink