May 2004
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
            1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30 31          
Apr   Jun


For more search options, please see the Advanced search form and the section of the User's Guide, Tips for Searching PULSE.


C H A N N E L S
• PULSE Home Page
• EXECUTIVE EDITION

• US News
• Canada News
• UK News
• New Zealand News

• Consumer Advocacy
• Health Care Systems
• Managed Care/Medicaid
• Co-occurring Disorders
• Clinical studies
• Pharmaceutical News
• Criminal Justice Systems
• Legislative News


U S E R ' S   G U I D E
About PULSE
PULSE Channels

Archives

Adding comments

Using the # link

Items that require registration

PULSE syndication

Tips for Searching PULSE


E M A I L   S U B S C R I P T I O N S

For WEEKLY summaries of PULSE postings, see the weekly email subscription form.

For DAILY mailings (powered by Bloglet), please enter your e-mail address below:


P U B L I C A T I O N S

PULSE ANNUAL No. 2
January 2003

Recent Trends, Challenges and Issues in Funding Public Mental Health Services in the US
March 2002

PULSE ANNUAL No. 1
October 2001

 

PULSE is powered by
Radio Userland
.

Listed on BlogShares

© Bill Davis, 2000-2003.

About PULSE | Channels | User's Guide | Email subscriptions | Publications




PULSE is a free service of the Centre for Community Change International, gathering new and noteworthy Internet resources for mental health providers, family members of individuals with mental illness, consumers of mental health services and consumer advocates. PULSE is researched, edited and designed by Bill Davis.



daily link  Wednesday, May 05, 2004


Outcomes-Based Drug Coverage in British Columbia
Article in Health Affairs - "For the past decade the provincial drug plan in British Columbia has based the allocation of public subsidy on scientific standards of evidence. Coverage policies under B.C. PharmaCare are marked by the restriction of public subsidy until manufacturers provide valid evidence of a comparative health outcome advantage versus therapeutic alternatives. Implementing and maintaining such outcomes-based coverage policies has required a system of evidentiary review and support. Since 1994 the Therapeutics Initiative at the University of British Columbia has provided provincial decisionmakers with such support. We describe lessons from the B.C. experience for jurisdictions interested in basing coverage on evidence of proven comparative advantage for patients’ health."  
permalink