| November 2004 | ||||||
| Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat |
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | |
| 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 |
| 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 |
| 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 |
| 28 | 29 | 30 | ||||
| Oct Dec | ||||||
For more search options, please see the Advanced search form and the section of the User's Guide, Tips for Searching PULSE.
C H A N N E L S
• PULSE Home
Page
•
EXECUTIVE
EDITION
•
US News
•
Canada
News
•
UK News
•
New
Zealand News
•
Consumer
Advocacy
•
Health
Care Systems
•
Managed
Care/Medicaid
•
Co-occurring
Disorders
•
Clinical
studies
•
Pharmaceutical
News
•
Criminal
Justice Systems
•
Legislative
News
U S E R ' S G
U I D E
About
PULSE
PULSE Channels
Archives
Adding comments
Using the # link
Items that require registration
PULSE syndication
Tips for Searching PULSE
E M A I L S
U B S C R I P T I O N S
For WEEKLY summaries
of PULSE postings, see the weekly
email subscription form.
For DAILY mailings (powered
by Bloglet), please enter your e-mail address below:
PULSE ANNUAL No. 2
January 2003
Recent
Trends, Challenges and Issues in Funding Public Mental Health Services
in the US
March 2002
PULSE ANNUAL No. 1
October 2001
PULSE is powered by
Radio Userland.
© Bill Davis, 2000-2003.
![]()
A Taxpayer-Funded Clinical Trials Registry and Results Database
Essay at the Public Library of Science web site by Erick Turner - "Over the past several years, there has been growing concern about selective publication of clinical trial results. The debate has intensified since New York State Attorney General Elliot Spitzer filed suit against GlaxoSmithKline on June 2, 2004, alleging that the company was hiding data regarding the efficacy and safety of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in pediatric patients with depression. ... In this essay, I argue that a highly valuable but underused registry and results database for US trials already exists within the Department of Health and Human Services, specifically within the Food and Drug Administration."
Reform of Postmarketing Drug Surveillance System Needed, Experts Say
Medscape Medical News story - "Early approval of new drugs in the U.S. is a double-edged sword, allowing the public rapid access to the health benefits of new drugs, yet potentially exposing them to serious adverse effects recognized after the drug launch. Much of the burden of early detection falls on the U.S. postmarketing systems. Recent congressional testimony by a reviewer from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and a study and several articles published in the Dec. 1 issue of JAMA and released online Nov. 22, have fueled the controversy over whether conflicts of interest could influence evaluation of suspected adverse drug reactions." [Viewing Medscape resources requires registration, which is free].![]()