| May 2005 | ||||||
| Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat |
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
| 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 |
| 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 |
| 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 |
| 29 | 30 | 31 | ||||
| Apr Jun | ||||||
For more search options, please see the Advanced search form and the section of the User's Guide, Tips for Searching PULSE.
C H A N N E L S
• PULSE Home
Page
•
EXECUTIVE
EDITION
•
US News
•
Canada
News
•
UK News
•
New
Zealand News
•
Consumer
Advocacy
•
Health
Care Systems
•
Managed
Care/Medicaid
•
Co-occurring
Disorders
•
Clinical
studies
•
Pharmaceutical
News
•
Criminal
Justice Systems
•
Legislative
News
U S E R ' S G
U I D E
About
PULSE
PULSE Channels
Archives
Adding comments
Using the # link
Items that require registration
PULSE syndication
Tips for Searching PULSE
E M A I L S
U B S C R I P T I O N S
For WEEKLY summaries
of PULSE postings, see the weekly
email subscription form.
For DAILY mailings (powered
by Bloglet), please enter your e-mail address below:
PULSE ANNUAL No. 2
January 2003
Recent
Trends, Challenges and Issues in Funding Public Mental Health Services
in the US
March 2002
PULSE ANNUAL No. 1
October 2001
PULSE is powered by
Radio Userland.
© Bill Davis, 2000-2003.
![]()
Patient Rep Reverses Position On SSRI Black-Box Warning Psychiatric News story on Gail Griffith - "The FDA's patient representative on the advisory committee on antidepressants and suicide recounts her perspective of why she and her fellow committee members decided to support a black-box warning—and why she changed her mind... 'Trotting out members of the public to air emotionally devastating, personal, and anecdotal stories and having those stories sit as evidence for the committee amounts to a barrage that can't help but sway how you feel and how you look at the data you are seeing,' Griffith said. 'Intellectual analysis does not happen [under those circumstances],' Griffith continued. 'It is an emotional exercise. After a day's worth of personal and anecdotal accounts—some pro, some con—if the committee could then be sequestered and thereby have the opportunity to fully examine the data in light of what we'd heard, then I think you would have some confidence in the notion that a scientific effort had been made to render a decision.' "![]()