May 2005
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30 31        
Apr   Jun


For more search options, please see the Advanced search form and the section of the User's Guide, Tips for Searching PULSE.


C H A N N E L S
PULSE Home Page
EXECUTIVE EDITION

US News
Canada News
UK News
New Zealand News

Consumer Advocacy
Health Care Systems
Managed Care/Medicaid
Co-occurring Disorders
Clinical studies
Pharmaceutical News
Criminal Justice Systems
Legislative News


U S E R ' S   G U I D E
About PULSE
PULSE Channels

Archives

Adding comments

Using the # link

Items that require registration

PULSE syndication

Tips for Searching PULSE


E M A I L   S U B S C R I P T I O N S

For WEEKLY summaries of PULSE postings, see the weekly email subscription form.

For DAILY mailings (powered by Bloglet), please enter your e-mail address below:


P U B L I C A T I O N S

PULSE ANNUAL No. 2
January 2003

Recent Trends, Challenges and Issues in Funding Public Mental Health Services in the US
March 2002

PULSE ANNUAL No. 1
October 2001

 

PULSE is powered by
Radio Userland
.

Listed on BlogShares

© Bill Davis, 2000-2003.

About PULSE | Channels | User's Guide | Email subscriptions | Publications




PULSE is a free service of the Centre for Community Change International, gathering new and noteworthy Internet resources for mental health providers, family members of individuals with mental illness, consumers of mental health services and consumer advocates. PULSE is researched, edited and designed by Bill Davis.



daily link  Monday, May 23, 2005


Patient Rep Reverses Position On SSRI Black-Box Warning  Psychiatric News story on Gail Griffith - "The FDA's patient representative on the advisory committee on antidepressants and suicide recounts her perspective of why she and her fellow committee members decided to support a black-box warning—and why she changed her mind... 'Trotting out members of the public to air emotionally devastating, personal, and anecdotal stories and having those stories sit as evidence for the committee amounts to a barrage that can't help but sway how you feel and how you look at the data you are seeing,' Griffith said. 'Intellectual analysis does not happen [under those circumstances],' Griffith continued. 'It is an emotional exercise. After a day's worth of personal and anecdotal accounts—some pro, some con—if the committee could then be sequestered and thereby have the opportunity to fully examine the data in light of what we'd heard, then I think you would have some confidence in the notion that a scientific effort had been made to render a decision.' "  
permalink