Patento.absurdiumIntellectual Property issues, IP law, and the delicate balance between progress and abuse |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Home · Consulting · Presentations · Essays · MapInfo · Archives · About |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Recently
Categories
By Topic Categories
By Audience
Theme and CSS
IT Support
Hosting and comments
|
Saturday, November 09, 2002Architects and Planners Want Ownership of Designscomment []
There's an interesting parallel (at least for me) between this article's position -- that architects and engineers should own and control their work -- and the Terms of Trade that used to exist in the graphic arts. I believe that, just like the graphic arts, architects and engineers will eventually lose this battle despite the trade associations and insurers staunch defense of the practice. They'll lose because customers aren't going to pay for something they can't use, and won't stand for firms "double-dipping" in an age of transparency. Of course, no one dies if a catalog, web site, or network design gets mangled by the next project. But, as this article points out, the right way to manage that risk is through indemnity clauses, not contracts that restrict the owner from using what he rightfully owns.
Copyright Infringement of Design Documents.
|
ContactTerry W. Frazier 1041 Honey Creek Road Suite 281 Conyers, GA 30013 770-918-1937 office 404-822-6014 mobile
Wide.angle
K.log
Un.commontary
Tech.knowlogy
Legal
Body.politic
Books
Radio.active
Design.graph
Ref.useful
Atlanta.area
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This Page was last updated: 11/28/2002; 6:32:46 PM
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||