<?xml version="1.0"?><!-- RSS generated by Radio UserLand v8.2.1 on Tue, 12 Dec 2006 09:38:13 GMT --><rss version="2.0">	<channel>		<title>Gil Friend: Sustainability</title>		<link>http://radio.weblogs.com/0109157/categories/sustainability/</link>		<description></description>		<copyright>Copyright 2006 Gil Friend</copyright>		<lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2006 09:38:13 GMT</lastBuildDate>		<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>		<generator>Radio UserLand v8.2.1</generator>		<managingEditor>gfriend@natlogic.com</managingEditor>		<webMaster>gfriend@natlogic.com</webMaster>		<category domain="http://www.weblogs.com/rssUpdates/changes.xml">rssUpdates</category> 		<skipHours>			<hour>1</hour>			<hour>3</hour>			<hour>4</hour>			<hour>2</hour>			<hour>0</hour>			<hour>5</hour>			<hour>23</hour>			<hour>12</hour>			</skipHours>		<cloud domain="radio.xmlstoragesystem.com" port="80" path="/RPC2" registerProcedure="xmlStorageSystem.rssPleaseNotify" protocol="xml-rpc"/>		<ttl>60</ttl>		<item>			<title>This blog has moved.</title>			<description>I&apos;ve moved my blog to &lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.natlogic.com/friend&quot;&gt;http://blogs.natlogic.com/friend&lt;/a&gt;The new site is still a work in progress, as I figure out all the bells, whistles and chicklets to deploy. So please, come visit, make suggestions, update your blogroll links, redirect your feed subscriptions - and send your friends!Thanks for reading,Gil</description>			<guid>http://radio.weblogs.com/0109157/categories/sustainability/2006/12/12.html#a1181</guid>			<pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2006 09:37:31 GMT</pubDate>			<comments>http://radiocomments2.userland.com/comments?u=109157&amp;amp;p=1181&amp;amp;link=http%3A%2F%2Fradio.weblogs.com%2F0109157%2F2006%2F12%2F12.html%23a1181</comments>			</item>		<item>			<title>Minding your Ps and Qs</title>			<description>The Ps? &lt;a href=&quot;http://radio.weblogs.com/0109157/2006/08/07.html#a1144&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;BP&lt;/a&gt;, and now &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.financialexpress.com/latest_full_story.php?content_id=139905&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;HP&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The Qs? What &lt;i&gt;are&lt;/i&gt; these people thinking? Why is this so hard?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Whatever happened to those simple ethical rules:&lt;br&gt;- What would happen if everyone did it?&lt;br&gt;- What would your mother think?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Forward looking ethical corporations, socially responsible corporations and all that are worthy commitments, but hey, folks, everything -- whether in business or in life -- starts with the fundamentals. No shortcuts.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description>			<guid>http://radio.weblogs.com/0109157/categories/sustainability/2006/09/10.html#a1154</guid>			<pubDate>Mon, 11 Sep 2006 07:28:25 GMT</pubDate>			<comments>http://radiocomments2.userland.com/comments?u=109157&amp;amp;p=1154&amp;amp;link=http%3A%2F%2Fradio.weblogs.com%2F0109157%2F2006%2F09%2F10.html%23a1154</comments>			</item>		<item>			<title>&quot;Measuring What Matters&quot; webinars</title>			<description>(Time for a little shameless self-promotion.) &quot;Measuring What Matters&quot; webinars&lt;br&gt;Using sustainability indicators to track and drive better performance&lt;br&gt;August 21, 2006, 12:00-1:00pm Pacific / August 29, 2006, 10:00a-11:00am Pacific&lt;p&gt;		Program Summary		&lt;br&gt;In response to popular demand, Natural Logic will begin offering a series of webinars, to deliver more information, to more people, with less carbon footprint!First up: &quot;Measuring What Matters.&quot;Everyone knows that what gets measured gets done.But how do you make sense of the growing mix of sustainability indicators, metrics, and KPIs that are such an essential part of sustainability reporting?How do you select powerful measures&amp;#732;and compelling goals-- that help track and drive better decisions, and better performance?And how do you actually put those measures to work for your organization: supporting strategy, implementation, and results?Logistics		&lt;br&gt;Monday, August 21, 2006&lt;br&gt;12:00pm to 1:00pm Pacific (3:00pm - 4:00pm Eastern)&lt;br&gt;or&lt;br&gt;Tuesday, August 29, 2006&lt;br&gt;10:00am to 11:00am Pacific (1:00pm - 2:00pm Eastern)&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://rs6.net/tn.jsp?t=byi7pxbab.0.brscqxbab.9v5vwtn6.1&amp;#38;ts=S0199&amp;#38;p=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.timeanddate.com%2Fworldclock%2Fconverter.html&quot;&gt;(Check your own time zone)&lt;/a&gt;)Price: $149Satisfaction guaranteed: We&apos;re so confident you&apos;ll get what you want from this webinar that we&apos;ll refund your full fee if you&apos;re not satisfied. It&apos;s risk-free.&lt;a href=&quot;http://rs6.net/tn.jsp?t=byi7pxbab.0.arscqxbab.9v5vwtn6.1&amp;#38;ts=S0199&amp;#38;p=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.meetingbridge.com%2Fseminar%2F%3F9025596&quot;&gt;Register now&lt;/a&gt; using this link, or paste this URL into your browser:&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.meetingbridge.com/seminar/?9025596&quot;&gt;http://www.meetingbridge.com/seminar/?9025596&lt;/a&gt;		&lt;p&gt;	Details		&lt;br&gt;This webinar is designed for people and organizations who have been grappling with the challenge of integrating sustainability into day-to-day work throughout their organization. Bring your specific issues and challenges for discussion.Measuring What Matters will cover&lt;br&gt;- How and when to set powerful goals&lt;br&gt;- How to select relevant metrics for every level and purpose&lt;br&gt;- How to manage the nuts &amp;#38; bolts of managing metrics:&lt;br&gt;   collecting, analyzing and deploying performance indicatorsThis webinar is based on Natural Logic&apos;s popular day-long workshop: &quot;Measuring What Matters: Tools for Assessing Progress towards Sustainability&quot; Some representative comments:&lt;br&gt;- &quot;Excellent!&quot;&lt;br&gt;- &quot;Informative and inspiring.&quot;&lt;br&gt;- &quot;I&apos;ll be able to use the info to review our divisions&apos; performance measures.&quot;&lt;br&gt;- &quot;The most valuable sustainability workshop I&apos;ve been to.&quot;Webinar leader		&lt;br&gt;Gil Friend, founder, president and CEO of Natural Logic, Inc., is a systems ecologist and business strategist with 35 years experience in business development and environmental innovation -- and inventor of the Business Metabolics&amp;#8482; key performance indicator (KPI) system. He authors The New Bottom Line, an internationally distributed column offering strategic perspectives on business and environment, and writes and speaks worldwide on business, environment, and resource policy issues.Natural Logic		&lt;br&gt;Natural Logic provides strategic, analytic and management services, supported by proprietary protocols and tools, that build our customers&apos; profit, resilience and competitive advantage through exceptional environmental performance.Our strategic assessments evaluate your company&apos;s aspirations, processes and productivity, identify opportunities to recover the lost profit embedded in &quot;waste&quot; of all kinds, and uncover your hidden profit potential. Our design, training, implementation and monitoring services help you put the &quot;how&quot; into practice.Natural Logic. Sustainable performance you can take to the bank.&amp;#8482;Questions?&lt;br&gt;If you have questions, or to schedule the full, day-long Measuring What Matters workshop for your organization, call 1-877-628-5644 (outside the US call +1-510-849-5467) or email measures at natlogic dot comWe look forward to seeing you on line!</description>			<guid>http://radio.weblogs.com/0109157/categories/sustainability/2006/08/14.html#a1146</guid>			<pubDate>Mon, 14 Aug 2006 22:56:05 GMT</pubDate>			<comments>http://radiocomments2.userland.com/comments?u=109157&amp;amp;p=1146&amp;amp;link=http%3A%2F%2Fradio.weblogs.com%2F0109157%2F2006%2F08%2F14.html%23a1146</comments>			</item>		<item>			<title>My head. It&apos;s talking</title>			<description>Deborah Streeter&apos;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://streeter.mannlib.cornell.edu/case.jsp?id=276&quot;&gt;extended interview with me&lt;/a&gt; at the NCIIA conference in March 2006 is now posted at the &lt;a href=&quot;http://eclips.cornell.edu&quot;&gt;Cornell University eClips web site&lt;/a&gt;. (You get a collection of thematic clips, as well as transcripts.)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I haven&apos;t watched them all yet, but my favorite so far is this one, on the &lt;a href=&quot;http://streeter.mannlib.cornell.edu/clip.jsp?id=7232&quot;&gt;strategic importance of aiming ahead of the trend&lt;/a&gt;. (I&apos;m sure there&apos;s a way to enclose the video right here, but I don&apos;t know what it is.)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I&apos;ve got more video coming in, from various recent presentations (including -- for something completely different -- &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.greenfestivals.org/&quot;&gt;Green Festival&lt;/a&gt;) -- and I&apos;ve added &quot;Build a demo reel&quot; to my &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.43folders.com/category/gtd/&quot;&gt;GTD&lt;/a&gt; list. (Helpers welcome. ;-)&lt;br&gt;</description>			<guid>http://radio.weblogs.com/0109157/categories/sustainability/2006/07/05.html#a1138</guid>			<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jul 2006 21:59:42 GMT</pubDate>			<comments>http://radiocomments2.userland.com/comments?u=109157&amp;amp;p=1138&amp;amp;link=http%3A%2F%2Fradio.weblogs.com%2F0109157%2F2006%2F07%2F05.html%23a1138</comments>			</item>		<item>			<title>Climate Haiku!</title>			<description>From the impressive Sonoma County (CA) &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.skymetrics.us/&quot;&gt;Climate Protection Campaign&lt;/a&gt;: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.skymetrics.us/haiku.php&quot;&gt;climate crisis haiku&lt;/a&gt;! A few samples:A frog in water&lt;br&gt;Doesn&apos;t feel it boil in time.&lt;br&gt;Dude, we are that frog.&lt;br&gt;[~]Haiku Hullabaloo winner,&lt;br&gt;Grist Magazine, July 2004andReduce by one fifth&lt;br&gt;First step to protect climate&lt;br&gt;Together no sweat&lt;br&gt;[~]Merrilyn Joyce, 9/23/03andCO2 haiku&lt;br&gt;Is not so easy to do&lt;br&gt;I&apos;m getting hot now&lt;br&gt;[~]Doron Amiran</description>			<guid>http://radio.weblogs.com/0109157/categories/sustainability/2006/06/30.html#a1136</guid>			<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jun 2006 20:00:23 GMT</pubDate>			<comments>http://radiocomments2.userland.com/comments?u=109157&amp;amp;p=1136&amp;amp;link=http%3A%2F%2Fradio.weblogs.com%2F0109157%2F2006%2F06%2F30.html%23a1136</comments>			</item>		<item>			<title>Quote of the Day</title>			<description>Sez &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.garyliss.com/&quot;&gt;Gary Liss&lt;/a&gt;, Mr. Zero Waste:&lt;blockquote&gt;If you&apos;re not for zero waste, how much waste &lt;i&gt;are&lt;/i&gt; you for?&lt;/blockquote&gt;Nice, eh?(Disclosure: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.garyliss.com/&quot;&gt;Natural Logic&lt;/a&gt; is working with Gary on the Zero Waste Plan for Palo Alto CA, as as the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.calsbc.org&quot;&gt;California Sustainable Business Council&lt;/a&gt;.)</description>			<guid>http://radio.weblogs.com/0109157/categories/sustainability/2006/06/29.html#a1134</guid>			<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jun 2006 22:57:49 GMT</pubDate>			<comments>http://radiocomments2.userland.com/comments?u=109157&amp;amp;p=1134&amp;amp;link=http%3A%2F%2Fradio.weblogs.com%2F0109157%2F2006%2F06%2F29.html%23a1134</comments>			</item>		<item>			<title>Greenlight Essay Contest</title>			<description>From &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.greenlagirl.com/&quot;&gt;GreenLAgirl&lt;/a&gt;, via &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.GreenBusiness.net/&quot;&gt;GreenBusiness.net&lt;/a&gt;:&lt;blockquote&gt;The &lt;a href=&quot;http://greenlagirl.com/2006/06/29/write-about-your-dream-green-home-for-2500/&quot;&gt;Greenlight Greenliving Essay Contest&lt;/a&gt; wants you to write a 500-word (or less) essay about &lt;i&gt;how you&apos;d renovate your home to make it environmentally friendly.&lt;/i&gt;Entries are due July 20, 2006.The winner gets $2,500. Sez the website: &lt;i&gt;Think as big or small as you want. Be creative and original!&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;(Greenlight is apparently a direct-to-consumer mortgage lender, FYI)</description>			<guid>http://radio.weblogs.com/0109157/categories/sustainability/2006/06/29.html#a1133</guid>			<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jun 2006 22:48:55 GMT</pubDate>			<comments>http://radiocomments2.userland.com/comments?u=109157&amp;amp;p=1133&amp;amp;link=http%3A%2F%2Fradio.weblogs.com%2F0109157%2F2006%2F06%2F29.html%23a1133</comments>			</item>		<item>			<title>CSR reports &apos;trivial&apos;?</title>			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sundayherald.com/56377&quot;&gt;[Sunday Herald (Scotland)]:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;Attempts by multinational corporations to talk up their social and environmental responsibility are so threadbare and misleading that they are preventing progress towards a sustainable future.That is the conclusion of a trenchant new study by one of the Scottish Executive[base &apos;]s leading environmental advisers, Jan Bebbington, a professor of accounting at St Andrews University. &lt;/blockquote&gt;The article is light on details, though, and I haven&apos;t yet been able to find the original report.</description>			<guid>http://radio.weblogs.com/0109157/categories/sustainability/2006/06/26.html#a1132</guid>			<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jun 2006 06:51:40 GMT</pubDate>			<comments>http://radiocomments2.userland.com/comments?u=109157&amp;amp;p=1132&amp;amp;link=http%3A%2F%2Fradio.weblogs.com%2F0109157%2F2006%2F06%2F26.html%23a1132</comments>			</item>		<item>			<title>Feedback &amp; regulatory reform</title>			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://radio.weblogs.com/0109157/2006/06/26.html#a1130&quot;&gt;Speaking of MSWG&lt;/a&gt;, I&apos;ll be speaking at their conference later this morning, together with client Carol Kraege of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ecy.wa.gov/&quot;&gt;Washington Ecology&lt;/a&gt;, about finding new sources of business value through innovative approaches to regulation. Specifically, we&apos;ll talk about the recent pilot project we conducted with them, exploring how comparative benchmarking of environmental footprints in the pulp and paper industry -- performance feedback -- can drive better performance, and more streamlined regulatory approaches.</description>			<guid>http://radio.weblogs.com/0109157/categories/sustainability/2006/06/26.html#a1131</guid>			<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jun 2006 18:16:49 GMT</pubDate>			<comments>http://radiocomments2.userland.com/comments?u=109157&amp;amp;p=1131&amp;amp;link=http%3A%2F%2Fradio.weblogs.com%2F0109157%2F2006%2F06%2F26.html%23a1131</comments>			</item>		<item>			<title>We don&apos; need to steenkin&apos; science</title>			<description>Apparently not.I&apos;m in Park City Utah today, for the &lt;a href = &quot;http://www.mswg.org&quot;&gt;Multi-State Working Group&lt;/a&gt; annual workshop. Salt Lake City Mayor, Rocky Anderson is giving the morning keynote, describing a surprisingly &lt;a href = &quot;http://www.slcgreen.com/default.htm&quot;&gt;Salt Lake City Green&lt;/a&gt; program; they&apos;re not on the &lt;a href = &quot;http://www.sustainlane.com&quot;&gt;SustainLane&lt;/a&gt; list, which rates only the 50 largest US cities, but they have met their 2012 Kyoto target six years early, so snaps on them!When he heard that Senator Oren Hatch said that &apos;the science of global warming is more like science fiction,&apos; Anderson called him and asked &apos;Oren, what have you read about this?&apos; Sen. Hatch&apos;s answer: Michael Crichton&apos;s book, &lt;i&gt;State of Fear&lt;/i&gt;! &apos;That&apos;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.earthinstitute.columbia.edu/news/2004/story12-13-04b.html&quot;&gt;fiction&lt;/a&gt;, Oren,&apos; Anderson said, &apos;you might want to read &lt;a href=&quot;href=&quot;http://www.nrdc.org/globalWarming/default.asp&quot;&gt;some&lt;/a&gt; of the &lt;a href=&quot;http://thinkprogress.org/2006/05/20/climate-scientist-to-cei&quot;&gt;science&lt;/a&gt;.&apos;There you go.</description>			<guid>http://radio.weblogs.com/0109157/categories/sustainability/2006/06/26.html#a1130</guid>			<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jun 2006 18:12:36 GMT</pubDate>			<comments>http://radiocomments2.userland.com/comments?u=109157&amp;amp;p=1130&amp;amp;link=http%3A%2F%2Fradio.weblogs.com%2F0109157%2F2006%2F06%2F26.html%23a1130</comments>			</item>		<item>			<title>Gore on King</title>			<description>Terry Gips of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.AllianceforSustainability.net&quot;&gt;Alliance for Sustainability&lt;/a&gt; in Minneapolis offers this heads up:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br style=&quot;font-style: italic;&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-style: italic;&quot;&gt;Al Gore will be discussing &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.climatecrisis.net&quot;&gt;Inconvenient Truth&lt;/a&gt; and Global Warming on &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cnn.com/CNN/Programs/larry.king.live/&quot;&gt;Larry King Live&lt;/a&gt; tomorrow night (Tuesday) at 8 pm.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;(And Ann Coulter tonight, if you can possibly stand it!)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If you haven&apos;t seen it (Inconvenient Truth, not Coulter), see it now. It&apos;s important. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2006/06/01/college-republicans-promo_n_22038.html&quot;&gt;College Republican shenanigans&lt;/a&gt; notwithstanding.&lt;br&gt;</description>			<guid>http://radio.weblogs.com/0109157/categories/sustainability/2006/06/12.html#a1129</guid>			<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jun 2006 05:06:38 GMT</pubDate>			<comments>http://radiocomments2.userland.com/comments?u=109157&amp;amp;p=1129&amp;amp;link=http%3A%2F%2Fradio.weblogs.com%2F0109157%2F2006%2F06%2F12.html%23a1129</comments>			</item>		<item>			<title>Cool beans</title>			<description>Lots of new releases geospatial releases from Google today:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;. Satellite imagery update: &lt;br&gt;. New version of Google Earth: &lt;br&gt;. Google SketchUp with textured buildings: &lt;br&gt;. Updates to Google Maps and the Google Maps API, including&lt;br&gt;. Google Maps API, and KML for Google Maps&lt;br&gt;. Google Maps for Enterprise&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Google Earth is available at &lt;a href=&quot;http://earth.google.com/&quot;&gt;http://earth.google.com/&lt;/a&gt;. The Google Maps API&lt;br&gt;is available at &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/apis/maps/&quot;&gt;http://www.google.com/apis/maps/&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description>			<guid>http://radio.weblogs.com/0109157/categories/sustainability/2006/06/12.html#a1128</guid>			<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jun 2006 22:54:34 GMT</pubDate>			<comments>http://radiocomments2.userland.com/comments?u=109157&amp;amp;p=1128&amp;amp;link=http%3A%2F%2Fradio.weblogs.com%2F0109157%2F2006%2F06%2F12.html%23a1128</comments>			</item>		<item>			<title>MashUp Showcase at Where2.0</title>			<description>Coming to you today from Google&apos;s GeoDeveloper Day -- the pre-event to the &lt;a href=&quot;http://conferences.oreillynet.com/where2006/&quot;&gt;Where 2.0&lt;/a&gt; conference tomorrow and Wednesday. Stay tuned for details -- unless I get so engroessed I forget to blog -- and most likely for a longer piece soon on &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.worldchanging.com&quot;&gt;WorldChanging&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The Google and event focus: looking at the intersection of &quot;search, maps and geolocation.&quot; &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;My focus: the intersection of that with sustainability -- and sustainable business -- opportunities. And in particular, the intersection of &lt;a href=&quot;http://earth.google.com&quot;&gt;place&lt;/a&gt; information and &lt;a href=&quot;http://natlogic.com/offerings/metrics&amp;amp;performance/index.html&quot;&gt;flow&lt;/a&gt; information and both &lt;a href=&quot;http://natlogic.com/offerings/metrics&amp;amp;performance/metabolics.html&quot;&gt;businesses&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://natlogic.com/offerings/strategy&amp;amp;management/publ_pol.html&quot;&gt;communities&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Larry: &quot;Since you can&apos;t be in more than one place at a time, these tecchnologies enable you to act as if you are.&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Stats: &lt;br&gt;GoogleEarth developers: 30,000&lt;br&gt;GoogleEarth downloads: 100,000,000 unique individuals&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;News: GoogleEarth 4 released today (&lt;a href=&quot;http://earth.google.com/&quot;&gt;Beta&lt;/a&gt;), simultaneously Windows/Mac/Linux&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;On to the &quot;mashup and KML showcase&quot;!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description>			<guid>http://radio.weblogs.com/0109157/categories/sustainability/2006/06/12.html#a1127</guid>			<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jun 2006 21:25:25 GMT</pubDate>			<comments>http://radiocomments2.userland.com/comments?u=109157&amp;amp;p=1127&amp;amp;link=http%3A%2F%2Fradio.weblogs.com%2F0109157%2F2006%2F06%2F12.html%23a1127</comments>			</item>		<item>			<title>More inconvenient truth</title>			<description>Al Gore&apos;s climate crisis film, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.climatecrisis.net/&quot;&gt;&apos;An Inconvenient Truth&apos;&lt;/a&gt;, opens in the Bay Ares this week. Maybe we&apos;ll see you at the &lt;a href=&quot;http://sanfrancisco.citysearch.com/profile/892494/&quot;&gt;afterparty&lt;/a&gt;.Meanwhile, truth is apparently inconvenient for the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Competitive_Enterprise_Institute#Funding&quot;&gt;Competitive Enterprise Institute&lt;/a&gt;. Remember their &lt;a href=&quot;http://radio.weblogs.com/0109157/2006/05/18.html#a1119&quot;&gt;&apos;carbon is life&apos; ad campaign&lt;/a&gt; that I wrote about a few days ago? Well, &lt;a href=&quot;http://factcheck.org/article395.html#&quot;&gt;FactCheck.org&lt;/a&gt; tells us that&lt;blockquote&gt;The ads drew a protest from a University of Missouri professor who says they are &apos;a deliberate effort to confuse and mislead the public about the global warming debate.&apos; He said one of them misuses a study he published in Science magazine last year on the Antarctic ice sheet. An editor of Science also said the ads misrepresent the findings of that study as well as a second study on Greenland&apos;s glaciers.&lt;/blockquote&gt;Lots of detail here, folks about gross and subtle media manipulation, and distortion of science.That said, I must say that I don&apos;t share the upset of folks about CEI&apos;s corporate funders. Lots of companies fund lots of think tanks that fund lots of things. What I find striking here is this:&lt;blockquote&gt;Just over 9 per cent [of CEI&apos;s funding] came from donations from ExxonMobil... which said two-thirds of their donation was earmarked for &apos;Global Climate Change and Global Climate Change Outreach.&apos;&lt;/blockquote&gt;Like Ben Bradleee said...</description>			<guid>http://radio.weblogs.com/0109157/categories/sustainability/2006/06/02.html#a1126</guid>			<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jun 2006 00:57:39 GMT</pubDate>			<comments>http://radiocomments2.userland.com/comments?u=109157&amp;amp;p=1126&amp;amp;link=http%3A%2F%2Fradio.weblogs.com%2F0109157%2F2006%2F06%2F02.html%23a1126</comments>			</item>		<item>			<description>[Bollix! I goobered up the html on this. Fixing it now...]&lt;a href=&quot;http://sustainlane.com&quot;&gt;SustainLane&lt;/a&gt; released their second &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sustainlane.com/article/895/The+SustainLane+2006+US+City+Rankings+Are+Here!.html&quot;&gt;&apos;sustainable cities&apos; rating&lt;/a&gt; this week, with plenty of media and some show and tell as the US Conference of Mayors conference in Las Vegas (which for some reason ranks #27 on the list).The top 10: Portland, San Francisco, Seattle, Philadelphia, Chicago, Oakland (yay!), New York, Boston, Denver and Minneapolis.Big difference: Last year they selected the 25 best cities; this year they ranked the 25 largest, so it&apos;s difficult to compare progres year to year.Big downside: by focusing on the biggest cities, plenty of leaders and innovators were left out -- including long-time Natural Logic client Berkeley CA (rated #3 last overall year).So it&apos;s important to be clear exactly what&apos;s being companred, and what&apos;s not. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.treehugger.com/files/2006/06/sustainlane_rel_1.php&quot;&gt; Treehuger  had some questions&lt;/a&gt; in that regard:Once we got past the top three, we began to do a little head-scratching. Top 10 cities Philadelphia and New York made another top 10 list this year: the top 10 most polluted cities as ranked by the American Lung Association. In the next tier, we found that Albuquerque, Tuscon, Phoenix and Los Angeles all made the top 25, and Las Vegas was close behind at #27. Given all of these cities&apos; reputations for massive amounts of sprawl and water consumption, their placement seemed... well... interesting. Looking at SustainLane&apos;s very thorough overview of its methodology gave us a better sense of how and why some cities fared as well as they did.&lt;/blockquote&gt;And they had some useful critique of the SustainLane methodology:&lt;blockquote&gt;[O]ne of the survey&apos;s primary methodological criterion was &apos;Data or information sets that would be of relatively equal importance to cities across the United States. For example, water conservation programs were not included because they would be much more important for a desert city in the Southwest than for a city with a plentiful water supply.&apos; While this makes for a much cleaner comparison between urban centers, it also ignores one of the fundamental tenets of sustainable development: adapting to the natural environment as it is.&lt;/blockquote&gt;OTOH, I think the folks at Treehugger &lt;i&gt;missed&lt;/i&gt; an important point with this observation: &lt;blockquote&gt;Perhaps it&apos;s not even necessary to rank cities, but to simply recognize those taking genuinely sustainable steps forward. &lt;/blockquote&gt;Of course it&apos;s not &lt;i&gt;necessary&lt;/i&gt;, but it sure can be useful. Rankings like this fuel the competitive spirit of mayors and other elected officials, who then start asking their staffs &apos;Why aren&apos;t we doing better?&apos; and potentially kick more into action. That&apos;s been our experience (with cities like Berkeley, Albuquerque -- a recent client, ranked #17 this year -- and others). And that&apos;s why we&apos;ve formed a strategic alliance with SustainLane: they&apos;ll focus on ranking cities, and we&apos;ll work with cities to help improve and deepen their sustainability initiatives, reduce their footprints, and raise their rankings. Give me a holler if you&apos;d like more details.(BTW, &lt;a href=&quot;http://sustainlane.com/article/747//U.S.+Cities%92+Preparedness+for+an+Oil+Crisis.html&gt;SustainLane&apos;s got another interesting ranking&lt;/a&gt;this one looks at cities&apos; preparedness for an oil crisis. Check it out.)</description>			<guid>http://radio.weblogs.com/0109157/categories/sustainability/2006/06/02.html#a1125</guid>			<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jun 2006 00:25:59 GMT</pubDate>			<comments>http://radiocomments2.userland.com/comments?u=109157&amp;amp;p=1125&amp;amp;link=http%3A%2F%2Fradio.weblogs.com%2F0109157%2F2006%2F06%2F02.html%23a1125</comments>			</item>		<item>			<title>Quote of the Day</title>			<description>Thanks to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.natlogic.com&quot;&gt;Karen Seeh&lt;/a&gt; for this one:&lt;blockquote&gt;However destructive may be the policies of the government and the methods and products of the corporations, the root of the problem is always found to be found in private life. We must learn to see that every problem that concerns us as conservationists always leads straight to the question of how we live. The world is being destroyed, no doubt about it, by the greed of the rich and powerful. It is also being destroyed by popular demand. &lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/search?client=safari&amp;rls=en&amp;q=wendell+berry&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;oe=UTF-8&quot;&gt;Wendell Berry&lt;/a&gt;, &quot;Conservation Is Good Work,&quot; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.powells.com/biblio/0679756515?&amp;PID=25646&quot;&gt;Sex, Economy, Freedom &amp; Community&lt;/a&gt;, 1991</description>			<guid>http://radio.weblogs.com/0109157/categories/sustainability/2006/05/29.html#a1124</guid>			<pubDate>Mon, 29 May 2006 19:22:57 GMT</pubDate>			<comments>http://radiocomments2.userland.com/comments?u=109157&amp;amp;p=1124&amp;amp;link=http%3A%2F%2Fradio.weblogs.com%2F0109157%2F2006%2F05%2F29.html%23a1124</comments>			</item>		<item>			<title>Quote of the Day</title>			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;htto://www.sun.com&quot;&gt;Sun Microsystems&lt;/a&gt; CEO Jonathan Schwartz musing at &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.alwayson-network.com/&quot;&gt;AlwaysOn&lt;/a&gt; about &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.alwayson-network.com/comments.php?id=15040_0_6_0_C&quot;&gt;&apos;Java, and Survival of the Most Adaptable&apos;&lt;/a&gt; (which has to do with much more than software).&lt;br&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;I&apos;m still amazed when I hear folks wondering &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/blogView?showComments=true&amp;amp;entry=3325167496&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;how Sun monetizes Java&lt;/a&gt;. So at the risk of repetition, I&apos;d like to share a few thoughts.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;When Thomas Edison first introduced the lightbulb, he held patents hetried to wield against potential competitors - he wanted to own theclient (the bulb) and the server (the dynamo). He failed. Standardsemerged around voltage and plugs, and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gepower.com/home/index.htm&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;GE Energy&lt;/a&gt;(formerly, Edison General Electric), to this day, remains one of themost profitable and interesting businesses around. How big would thepower business be today if you could only buy bulbs and appliances fromone company? A far sight smaller, I&apos;d imagine. Standards grew marketsand value.&lt;/blockquote&gt;And they still can. (As long as they&apos;re designed so they don&apos;t stiffle innovation.)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;We&apos;ve seen the power of standards -- even voluntary ones -- in the impact that the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.usgbc.org&quot;&gt;LEED&amp;#8482; rating system&lt;/a&gt; has had on the growth of &apos;green building&apos; -- and in the impact we hope to have with the development of the S-BAR &apos;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sijournal.com/breakingnews/1606317.html&quot;&gt;sustainable&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://makower.typepad.com/joel_makower/2005/05/sustainable_bus.html&quot;&gt;business&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.natlogic.com/resources/nbl/v14/n04.html&quot;&gt;rating&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.stopwaste.org/home/index.asp?page=128&quot;&gt;system&lt;/a&gt;.&apos; (Not exactly the same sort of standards that Schwartz is discussing, but in the lineage.)&lt;br&gt;</description>			<guid>http://radio.weblogs.com/0109157/categories/sustainability/2006/05/28.html#a1123</guid>			<pubDate>Mon, 29 May 2006 06:35:16 GMT</pubDate>			<comments>http://radiocomments2.userland.com/comments?u=109157&amp;amp;p=1123&amp;amp;link=http%3A%2F%2Fradio.weblogs.com%2F0109157%2F2006%2F05%2F28.html%23a1123</comments>			</item>		<item>			<title>Passive Survivability</title>			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.buildinggreen.com/&quot;&gt;Building Green&lt;/a&gt; quotes my &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.natlogic.com/resources/nbl/v15/n02.html&quot;&gt;Sustainability -- At the Tipping Point?&lt;/a&gt; article in their recent posting on  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.buildinggreen.com/auth/article.cfm?fileName=150501a.xml&quot;&gt;Passive Survivability: A New Design Criterion for Buildings&lt;/a&gt;. (Another aspect of future-proofing; more to come on that soon.)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Here&apos;s an excerpt:&lt;br&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;In some ways, the failure of conventional buildings to maintainsurvivable conditions can be thought of as a failure of design. &apos;Ifthey lose only electricity,&apos; notes building researcher Terry Brennan,of Camroden Associates, Inc., in West-moreland, New York, &apos;fewbuildings in the U.S. can provide as much comfort as my backpackingtent; if the gas lines and water lines go, the situation is evenworse.&apos;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Some strategies for passive survivability can be found bylooking back at our building heritage -- vernacular designs that were inplace before electricity and readily transportable fuels becameavailable. The wide-open and well-ventilated &apos;dog-trot&apos; homes of theDeep South are examples, as are the high-mass adobe buildings of theAmerican Southwest. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The house designs of some animals display even better examples of passive survivability.... &lt;br&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;Thanks to Arthur Young of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.igreenbuild.com&quot;&gt;iGreenBuild&lt;/a&gt; for the tip!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description>			<guid>http://radio.weblogs.com/0109157/categories/sustainability/2006/05/28.html#a1122</guid>			<pubDate>Sun, 28 May 2006 19:13:58 GMT</pubDate>			<comments>http://radiocomments2.userland.com/comments?u=109157&amp;amp;p=1122&amp;amp;link=http%3A%2F%2Fradio.weblogs.com%2F0109157%2F2006%2F05%2F28.html%23a1122</comments>			</item>		<item>			<title>Convenient truths</title>			<description>Oops, I forgot the link to that NDRC climate change slide slide. And can&apos;t find it now.  But there&apos;s a wealth of information at &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nrdc.org/globalWarming/qthinice.asp&quot;&gt;NDRC&apos;s &apos;global warming&apos; FAQ page&lt;/a&gt;.</description>			<guid>http://radio.weblogs.com/0109157/categories/sustainability/2006/05/26.html#a1121</guid>			<pubDate>Sat, 27 May 2006 01:57:05 GMT</pubDate>			<comments>http://radiocomments2.userland.com/comments?u=109157&amp;amp;p=1121&amp;amp;link=http%3A%2F%2Fradio.weblogs.com%2F0109157%2F2006%2F05%2F26.html%23a1121</comments>			</item>		<item>			<title>Inconvenient Truths</title>			<description>Al Gore&apos;s much touted movie, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.climatecrisis.net&quot;&gt;The Inconvenient Truth&lt;/a&gt; opens nationwide today, and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.climatecrisis.net/seethetruth/theaters.html&quot;&gt;goes wider next week&lt;/a&gt;. (You can see the trailer &lt;a href=&quot;http:%20//www.youtube.com/watch?v=&quot; tuip6dqpyne=&quot;&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt; or &lt;a href=&quot;http:%20//video.google.com/videoplay?docid=&quot; 2078944470709189270=&quot;&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.) &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I haven&apos;t seen the film yet yet, but I did see Gore&apos;s live multi-media version (on which the film is based) at Stanford late last year. Besides being a tour de force of presentation skills (I left the theater thinking - like many others I spoke to - &quot;Where was &lt;i&gt;this&lt;/i&gt; guy when we needed him on the campaign trail in 2000?&quot;), it was a chilling glimpse into our all too likely future. (My posse tells me the movie is a bit long, and a bit too [candidate?] Gore-focused, but still well worth seeing. See it sooner rather than later, since the early returns will guide how widely Paramount rolls it out.)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Investment executive Tom Van Dyck says:&lt;blockquote&gt;I&apos;ve seen Gore give this presentation 6 times and it is hands down one of the best I&apos;ve seen on any topic, but especially Global Warming. Armed with eloquence, scientific data and humor, Gore decisively settles the &apos;debate&apos; on global warming and connects all the challenges presented by the imminent climate crisis: rising sea levels, displaced populations, extreme weather, disease, biodiversity, agriculture, air quality, peace and security. In the end, it is a compelling call to action and you will not leave unmoved.... &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It is essential that as many people see it as possible-this film awakens all, regardless of political affiliation, who see it to what is really at stake.... take your skeptical family and friends with you who have bought into the rhetoric that Global Warming is a &apos;theory&apos;.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As we enter a carbon constrained economy those management teams that are more aware of this reality will be better situated to take advantage of opportunities in their businesses and deliver more value to their shareholders than management teams blinded to the reality of global warming.  The most obvious example is Toyota vs GM and Ford.  Many other examples will develop over the next decade that will reward those who have a vision of environmental responsibility and best business practices.&lt;/blockquote&gt;As if that wasn&apos;t enough, we saw NRDC&apos;s global warming opus (a mere PowerPoint deck) at Googleplex a few months ago. It was that very much of the content surprised me -- it didn&apos;t -- but seeing the whole case carefully assembled and hammered home shook even my sometimes jaded self to the core.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Two immediate impacts for me: 1) looking more deeply at my family&apos;s personal choices and carbon footprint (all too easily overlooked as I spend my days &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.natlogic.com&quot;&gt;giving advice to others&lt;/a&gt;); 2) talking more with &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.natlogic.com/results/clients.html&quot;&gt; our clients&lt;/a&gt;, their CxOs, and their boards about the risks -- and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.natlogic.com/resources/nbl/v13/n06.html&quot;&gt;fiduciary&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.natlogic.com/resources/nbl/v14/n07.html&quot;&gt;duty&lt;/a&gt; implications -- of willful neglect of these trends, and the opportunities -- and &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Future_proofing&quot;&gt;future-proofing&lt;/a&gt; potential -- of engaging them responsibly, aggressively -- and right now.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In related news, our friends at &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.worldchanging.com/&quot;&gt;Worldchanging&lt;/a&gt; have declared -- in response to climate-skeptic comment postings -- that &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.worldchanging.com/archives/004469.html&quot;&gt; the debate is over&lt;/a&gt;. (Hey, even George Bush agrees... sorta.)&lt;br&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;Indeed, it is precisely because the climatecrisis is so profound that we need to encourage the American debate onthe subject to move on, finally and for good, and start to focusing onhow to build a bright green future as quickly as possible. &lt;a target=&quot;new&quot; href=&quot;http://www.realclimate.org/index.php?p=167&quot;&gt;Thescience, after all, is pretty unequivocal at this point&lt;/a&gt;.Indeed, essentially the last remaining credible skeptic, ScientificAmerican columnist &lt;a target=&quot;new&quot; href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Shermer&quot;&gt;MichaelShermer&lt;/a&gt; announced this month that, despite his dislike forenvironmental groups,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;i&gt;[D]ata trump politics, and a convergence ofevidence from numerous sources has led me to make a cognitive switch onthe subject of anthropogenic climate change. ... Because of thecomplexity of the problem, environmental skepticism was once tenable.No longer. It is time to flip from skepticism toactivism.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;In other words, the debate is over. It&apos;s just over. Climatechange is here, it&apos;s scarier than we thought, we&apos;re causing it, and(especially in combination with other large-scale environmental andsocial problems) it&apos;s going to demand radical innovation and majorreforms.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;But how do we get the word out to a wider audience? &lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;And bless their creative little worldchanging hearts, they&apos;re working on just that:&lt;br&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;As we work to prepare a first draft of the &lt;a target=&quot;new&quot; href=&quot;http://www.worldchanging.com/archives/004469.html&quot;&gt;&quot;Universal Climate Skeptic Response Post&quot;&lt;/a&gt; -- a single-page resource explaining why the debate on the need for action in response to climate change is over -- we are also looking create some compelling visuals bearing the same message. Indeed, this is our first &lt;a target=&quot;new&quot; href=&quot;http://www.worldchanging.com/archives/004481.html&quot;&gt;design competition&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/blockquote&gt;(In lighter climate news, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.idealbite.com&quot;&gt;Ideal Bite&lt;/a&gt;&apos;s excited about Hollywood&apos;s embrace of the climate change issue (and the industry&apos;s abilty to move a message &lt;i&gt;can&lt;/i&gt; help move minds). OTOH, others wonder about the net carbon impact of stars showing up for the Oscars in electric cars but still flying between megahomes in private jets....)</description>			<guid>http://radio.weblogs.com/0109157/categories/sustainability/2006/05/26.html#a1120</guid>			<pubDate>Sat, 27 May 2006 01:30:11 GMT</pubDate>			<comments>http://radiocomments2.userland.com/comments?u=109157&amp;amp;p=1120&amp;amp;link=http%3A%2F%2Fradio.weblogs.com%2F0109157%2F2006%2F05%2F26.html%23a1120</comments>			</item>		<item>			<title>CO2: We call it life</title>			<description>Here&apos;s an amazing example of what the mind of a skilled propagandist can produce:&lt;a href=&quot;http://streams.cei.org/&quot;&gt;Two 60-second television spots&lt;/a&gt; from the Competitive Enterprise Institute &apos;focusing on the alleged global warming crisis and the calls by some environmental groups and politicians for reduced energy use.&apos; &lt;blockquote&gt;Carbon Dioxide: It&apos;s what we breathe out, and what plants breathe in. They call it pollution. We call it life.&lt;/blockquote&gt; True enough, but put true statements in distorting contexts, and what do you get? Highly polished sleeze.I&apos;m wondering who, at what agency, did the creative on these, and how well they&apos;re sleeping at night, and how well they&apos;ll sleep with seawater lapping at their feet. &apos;Got milk&apos; has got nothing on these guys.Brought to you by the Let&apos;s Go To Hell In A Faster Handbasket Marketing Board.</description>			<guid>http://radio.weblogs.com/0109157/categories/sustainability/2006/05/18.html#a1119</guid>			<pubDate>Fri, 19 May 2006 00:51:24 GMT</pubDate>			<comments>http://radiocomments2.userland.com/comments?u=109157&amp;amp;p=1119&amp;amp;link=http%3A%2F%2Fradio.weblogs.com%2F0109157%2F2006%2F05%2F18.html%23a1119</comments>			</item>		<item>			<title>Design Science Lab</title>			<description>&apos;If success or failure of this planet and of human beings depended on how I am and what I do, HOW WOULD I BE? WHAT WOULD I DO?&apos;- R. Buckminster FullerThe &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bfi.org&quot;&gt;Buckminster Fuller Intitute&lt;/a&gt; reoprts that details for DESIGN SCIENCE LAB 2006 are now online &lt;a href=&quot;at:http://www.designsciencelab.org/newyork.php&quot;&gt;at:http://www.designsciencelab.org/newyork.php&lt;/a&gt; (June 21-30) and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.designsciencelab.org/asheville.php&quot;&gt;http://www.designsciencelab.org/asheville.php&lt;/a&gt; (July 19-28) &lt;blockquote&gt;The Design Science Lab offers a unique inter-generational, intense, and collaborative environment in which participants develop solutions to global and local problems using present day technologyand known resources--&apos;doing more with less&apos;.&amp;nbsp;The program&amp;nbsp;features hands-on&amp;nbsp;trainingexperience in complex problem solving,&amp;nbsp;employing an approach pioneered by R. Buckminster&amp;nbsp;Fuller called comprehensive anticipatory design science.&lt;/blockquote&gt;Consider this a recommendation. I cut my teeth on Bucky&apos;s &apos;World Game&apos; -- a month-long version of this -- 30+ years ago. This  &apos;design charrette for the planet,&apos; as I call it, was a deep dive into both big picture systems thinking and nitty-gritty, on-the-ground data -- looking at (1) where we are as a planet, (2) where need to be for success for 100% of humanity, and (3) how we got from #1 to #2 -- &lt;i&gt;reverse&lt;/i&gt; engineering the pathway. The clear conculsion: we could find no resource or technology barriers to planetary success, only shortages of human and political will. That set my course -- from World Game to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ilsr.org&quot;&gt;Institute for Local Self-Reliance&lt;/a&gt; to Office of Appropriate Technology to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.natlogic.com&quot;&gt;Natural Logic&lt;/a&gt; (with a few other interesting stops along the way).There&apos;s a thread that has run through it all. More on that soon.</description>			<guid>http://radio.weblogs.com/0109157/categories/sustainability/2006/05/16.html#a1117</guid>			<pubDate>Wed, 17 May 2006 06:47:04 GMT</pubDate>			<comments>http://radiocomments2.userland.com/comments?u=109157&amp;amp;p=1117&amp;amp;link=http%3A%2F%2Fradio.weblogs.com%2F0109157%2F2006%2F05%2F16.html%23a1117</comments>			</item>		<item>			<title>The blogging gap</title>			<description>... is a consequence of my travel schedule &amp;c -- seems like I&apos;ve been on the road much of the last 7 weeks. Back home and in the office now for the next few weeks &lt;a href=&quot;http://natlogic.com/news/events/natlogic.html&quot;&gt;before the speaking schedule cranks up again&lt;/a&gt;.BTW, you can also see some short clips of what I&apos;ve been thinking and speaking about here at &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.big-picture.tv/index.php?id=80&amp;cat=&amp;a=207&quot;&gt;Big Picture TV&lt;/a&gt;.</description>			<guid>http://radio.weblogs.com/0109157/categories/sustainability/2006/05/12.html#a1116</guid>			<pubDate>Sat, 13 May 2006 01:43:34 GMT</pubDate>			<comments>http://radiocomments2.userland.com/comments?u=109157&amp;amp;p=1116&amp;amp;link=http%3A%2F%2Fradio.weblogs.com%2F0109157%2F2006%2F05%2F12.html%23a1116</comments>			</item>		<item>			<title>Happy birthday - to us!</title>			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.natlogic.com&quot;&gt;Natural Logic&lt;/a&gt; is seven years old today!It&apos;s been a sometimes challenging road, but &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.NatLogic.com/resources/nbl/v15/n02.html&quot;&gt;just look at where the world has moved to in that short time&lt;/a&gt;Thank you for &lt;b&gt;your&lt;/b&gt; part in &lt;b&gt;our&lt;/b&gt; part in making that happen.</description>			<guid>http://radio.weblogs.com/0109157/categories/sustainability/2006/05/12.html#a1115</guid>			<pubDate>Sat, 13 May 2006 01:38:05 GMT</pubDate>			<comments>http://radiocomments2.userland.com/comments?u=109157&amp;amp;p=1115&amp;amp;link=http%3A%2F%2Fradio.weblogs.com%2F0109157%2F2006%2F05%2F12.html%23a1115</comments>			</item>		<item>			<title>da Vinci&apos;s 7 Principles</title>			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://kre8tivekonceptz.com/principles.html&quot;&gt;daVinci&lt;/a&gt; to &lt;a href=&quot;http://coolmel.typepad.com/iblog/&quot;&gt; coolmel&lt;/a&gt; to &lt;a href=&quot;http://thenonbillablehour.typepad.com/nonbillable_hour/&quot;&gt;Ho&lt;s&gt;h&lt;/s&gt;mann&lt;/a&gt; to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ottmarliebert.com/blog/2006/03/da-vincis-7-principles.html&quot;&gt;Liebert&lt;/a&gt; to you:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://kre8tivekonceptz.com/principles.html&quot;&gt;da Vinci&apos;s 7 Principles&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;Curiosit&amp;aacute;&lt;/b&gt; - &lt;i&gt;An insatiably curious approach to life and an unrelenting quest for continuous learning.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;Dimostrazione&lt;/b&gt; - &lt;i&gt;A commitment to test knowledge through experience, persistance, and a willingness to learn from mistakes.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;Sensazione&lt;/b&gt; - &lt;i&gt;The continual refinement of the senses, especially sight, as the means to enliven experience.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;Sfumato&lt;/b&gt; (Literally &quot;Going up in smoke&quot;) - &lt;i&gt;A willingness to embrace ambiguity, paradox, and uncertainty.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;Arte/Scienza&lt;/b&gt; - &lt;i&gt;The development of the balance between science and art, logic and imagination. &quot;Whole-Brain&quot; thinking.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;Corporalita&lt;/b&gt; - &lt;i&gt;The cultivation of grace, ambidexterity, fitness, and poise.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;Connessione&lt;/b&gt; - &lt;i&gt;A recognition of and appreciation for the interconnectedness of all things and phenomena. Systems thinking.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br&gt;(Via&lt;a href=&quot;http://coolmel.typepad.com/iblog/&quot;&gt; coolmel&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;</description>			<guid>http://radio.weblogs.com/0109157/categories/sustainability/2006/03/21.html#a1106</guid>			<pubDate>Wed, 22 Mar 2006 06:09:37 GMT</pubDate>			<comments>http://radiocomments2.userland.com/comments?u=109157&amp;amp;p=1106&amp;amp;link=http%3A%2F%2Fradio.weblogs.com%2F0109157%2F2006%2F03%2F21.html%23a1106</comments>			</item>		</channel>	</rss>