Update from HonestReporting.com
HonestReporting shares all of Israel's grief over the weekend murder of
four Israelis in a shooting ambush.
BBC's report only mentions in the seventh paragraph that three of the
victims were parents and their child. And BBC makes no reference to the
nine orphans they left behind.
In the meantime, the Jerusalem Post reports that Ali al Rafai of BBC's
Arabic-language service seems to be inciting assassination. BBC asked
Israeli Foreign Ministry spokesman Ofir Gandelman if he thought that,
following Hamas leader Salah Shahadeh's killing, the Palestinians have the
right to assassinate Prime Minister Ariel Sharon.
* * *
25 July 2002
"A WAVE OF GOOD COVERAGE"
Dear HonestReporting Member,
Bret Stephens, the editor-in-chief of the Jerusalem Post, has written an
excellent analysis of shifting media trends. He cites HonestReporting's
work, and generally provides important information for anyone involved in
the battle against media bias.
We encourage you to read the full article, printed below.
========== JERUSALEM POST ============
SYMPATHY FOR THE DEVIL
Suddenly, a wave of charitable coverage of Israel
by Bret Stephens
"Israel's crack Palnat Company is on the front lines of the war against
terror," writes Newseek's Joshua Hammer about the reserve unit with which
he spent three days on patrol earlier this month. Hammer offers a broadly
flattering picture of "Haifa bakers and Tel-Aviv software engineers"
taking extraordinary personal risks in the service of their country and
united in the conviction, as one soldier is quoted as saying, "that what
we're doing is necessary." Even the article's title is telling: "A Shark
Hunt in the Night" leaves little room for doubt as to just who the real
Then there is Ian Fisher's remarkable piece in the July 8 edition of The
New York Times: "For Israelis Wounded in Bomb Attacks, Recovery Is a
Battle." Fisher tells the stories of five terror victims, of the doctors
who treat them, and of the family members who watch over them. Efrat
Ravid, 21, a "pretty young woman" who was caught by the Moment Cafe
bombing, still fears losing the leg the doctors saved. Motti Mizrahi, 31,
also at Moment that night, very nearly had his left hand severed, and now
lives in constant pain. Maya DaMari, 17, injured in the Karnei Shomron
pizzeria bombing, has a 1.5 inch nail lodged in her brain. Ilona
Shaportova, 15, a victim of the Dolphinarium attack, had part of her head
blown off and today can utter about 30 words. And Ronit Tubul, 30, wounded
in the June 18 bus bombing, had her skull broken and has shrapnel in her
"It took two weeks before she could speak again," Fisher writes. "In a
small nation like Israel," he adds, "the wounded produce a ripple effect
through society that partly explains the strong support Israelis give to
military measures like the recent retaking of practically the entire West
Bank... That is because unlike the dead, the injured do not disappear.
They go on, publicly, and painfully, battling wounds often far worse than
those seen in a nation at peace."
But the Times and Newsweek stories are as nothing next the extraordinary
show of contrition put on by CNN in the form of its "Victims of Terror"
"The people of Israel have faced the daily prospect of suicide bombings
for more than 20 months since the start of the new Intifada," reads the
show's publicity sheet. "CNN focuses on the human suffering and
psychological ramifications that 71 bombings have placed on the Israeli
population as they attempt to carry on their daily lives."
And then on to segments about those who'd lost loved ones, the work of
emergency service personnel, the disruptions of ordinary routine, and so
* * *
What accounts for this apparent shift in emphasis, if that indeed is what
it is? Three factors: First, a public outcry, combined with the threat of
boycotts; second, President Bush's speech of June 24; and third, a large
dose of editorial guilt.
The first of these is easily documented. US media watchdog groups like
CAMERA and HonestReporting.com have been unrelenting, and increasingly
successful, in raising awareness of media bias against Israel. Eason
Jordan, chief news executive at CNN in Atlanta, reports being flooded with
as many as 6,000 complaining emails per day. In Washington, DC, a group
called BoycottThePost.org organized a subscription-cancellation campaign.
It garnered several hundred cancellations. Much the same went for The Los
Angeles Times, The New York Times, the San Francisco Chronicle, and the
In Minneapolis, a group called Minnesotans Against Terrorism took out a
full-page, $16,500 ad to protest the Minneapolis Star-Tribune's
characterization of the Pessah Seder bomber as a "militant." (The paper's
editor, Jim Boyd, called the ad's signers, which included the state's two
US Senators, "craven.")
And at National Public Radio, ombudsman Jeff Dvorkin reports receiving
9,000 emails over three months concerning the station's alleged
pro-Palestinian bias. "No one has ever seen pressure like this before," he
The pressure is having an effect. Boston's NPR outlet, WBUR-FM, has lost
between $1-$2 million in cancelled individual funding, or about 7 percent
of its usual revenues. CNN's Jordan has promised never to air interviews
with the families of suicide bombers, and has offered loud mea culpas for
mishandling an interview with terror victim Hen Keinan. Washington Post
ombudsman Michael Getler has been forced publicly to address the issue of
anti-Israel bias in some 10 columns. The New York Times, Chicago Tribune,
and Boston Globe have all featured lengthy news stories concerning the
issue of anti-Israel bias, including their own.
The cumulative impact here is twofold. There are financial considerations:
CNN's record of shoddy coverage of Israel is at least one reason why
Rupert Murdoch's FOX news channel has pulled ahead in the ratings battle.
The New York Times, too, cannot well afford to be too much at odds with
the views of American Jewry, usually its most captive audience.
But the larger effect has been a certain amount of consciousness-raising
in the news room. Until recently, the problem with much of the news
media's coverage of the conflict is that it has been intellectually
complacent, playing the story as one pitting a Palestinian-Israeli peace
camp against "extremists on both sides." Terror attacks and Israeli
reprisals were routinely taken as attacks against "the peace process,"
rather than for what they most obviously were: wanton aggression versus
Now that complacency has somewhat been shaken. Cautiously, editors and
producers are taking a second look.
* * *
Next there is the Bush speech.
The effects of political rhetoric are usually underestimated, in part
because so much of it tends to be overblown. But the president's speech
was unlike any other delivered on the subject of the Middle East in recent
memory. It replaced the land-for-peace doctrine, which had governed
mainline thinking on the Middle East for 35 years, with a
In doing so, Bush shifted international focus from what Israel was failing
to do to get peace -- concede land -- to what the Palestinian Authority
wasn't doing -- reform its institutions.
Willy-nilly, the news media was forced to play along.
Thus, on the day after the president's speech, we had The Washington Post
editorializing that the president's "one-sided approach might be
appropriate if Israel's government were committed to the two-state
vision... [but Sharon's] government has shown no inclination to modify the
settlement policy that makes an ultimate agreement ever more difficult."
But three weeks later, the editorial stress had shifted to the other foot,
with the Post carping that "the administration's spokespeople have not
made it clear how they intend to promote the democratic selection of a new
The New York Times, too, seemed to change its tune. "However queasy Bush's
approach may make internationalists," wrote New York Times reporter Serge
Schmemann in a July 1 news analysis, "it seems not entirely unreasonable
to set a high standard for the Palestinians, since they are seeking to
join the community of governments and clearly need help from Washington to
The president, said Schmemann, had offered the Middle East "a brave new
approach" -- a truly remarkable concession, coming from the Times.
But perhaps the most telling indicator is also the crudest. An Internet
search of virtually every English-language news report published in the
first 18 months of the "Al Aqsa Intifada" reveals that the words "Arafat"
and "democracy" appeared in the same story a mere 155 times. By contrast,
in the past three months, as Bush increasingly stressed the need for
Palestinian reform, the figure rose to 528 -- 279 times in the past three
* * *
Finally -- and this on a hunch -- guilt.
Among reporters and editors alike, the old saw, typically proffered near
deadline, is that today's newspaper is tomorrow's packaging paper. But
nobody in the news business really believes it.
Decent journalists, covering important beats, live with the healthy dose
of fear that they may be getting the story wrong, that a more
knowledgeable posterity will hold them partially culpable for leading the
public of their times down a disastrous road. So it is, at least, with the
fate of the Jews.
Consider this: On July 2, 1944, The New York Times reported that 400,000
Hungarian Jews had been murdered by the Nazis, and that another 350,000
were to be exterminated within weeks. A useful item of information,
obviously -- and one the editors of the Times chose to run at four column
inches, and that on page 12.
Much the same went for the paper's editorials. According to Susan Tifft
and Alex Jones, authors of The Trust: The Private and Powerful Family
Behind The New York Times, from 1941 to 1943 the Times made editorial
mention of the fate of the Jews under Nazi Germany exactly nine times.
"Editorials concerning the Warsaw resistance and subsequent ghetto
uprising... referred obliquely to 'the Poles' and 'Warsaw patriots.'"
None of this was for lack of better information. As with today's media
critics, in the early 1940s the Times found itself under a barrage of
criticism from Jewish media watchdog groups, "most of whom disagreed
violently with the Times' coverage." Yet, almost defiantly, the Times
persisted in underreporting the fate of European Jewry, mainly because its
publisher, Arthur Sulzberger, feared being accused of "special pleading"
on behalf of the Jews and felt he had to "lean over backwards to be
objective and balanced in its stories about Jews."
Sulzberger, at the time also a vehement anti-Zionist, "was vigilant about
correcting any suggestion that he or the paper might represent Jewish
interests," write Tifft and Jones.
In his memoir, The Times of My Life and My Life With The Times, former
Times editor Max Frankel notes that this "past hung over us for decades."
Never again would the paper fail to forewarn of impending massacre
(although that is largely what happened in its coverage of the Indochina
wars), or obscure the plight of the oppressed. Still, in its coverage of
the Middle East over the years, the Times remained remarkably skeptical of
Israeli actions and intentions, as if its postwar endorsement of Zionism
was issued on a probationary basis.
And then: The lynching of two reservists in Ramallah. The Dolphinarium
attack. The Sbarro massacre. The Seder massacre. The attack on the Egged
32 bus. Seventy-odd suicide attacks in all. Whispers, growing ever louder,
that Palestinian terror was not instrumental in its purposes but actually
genocidal in its aims.
It remains to be seen whether the new sympathy for Israel's plight, not
just from the Times but for other news media as well, reflects a gradual
change in attitude, a momentary aberration, or a calculated exercise in
covering one's tracks. Still, one wonders whether America's leading
editors and producers aren't casting glances, both backwards and forwards,
to get out from under the haunting mistakes of the past, and the searing
judgments of posterity.
========== ABOUT HONESTREPORTING ============
HonestReporting welcomes you to submit media critiques for possible
inclusion in future communiques. Be sure to include a URL of the article
you are critiquing, and send to: email@example.com
Want to do more to help? Encourage your friends to join the growing
movement of HonestReporting. Send a friendly info message from:
HONESTREPORTING INFO SHEET to print out, post on bulletin boards,
photocopy and distribute. Get the word out to schools, places of worship,
community centers. Go to: http://www.honestreporting.com/HRPrintout.pdf
Privacy Guarantee: HonestReporting will never share your e-mail address or
personal details with anyone. Our web servers feature the latest
Are you tired of terrorists getting away with murder? When suicide bombers
blow up pizzerias and discotheques in Israel, the media refuses to call
them "terrorists." Take 10 seconds and get the media to fix this
outrageous policy. Sign the petition now at http://www.terrorpetition.com
HonestReporting involves considerable research and manpower costs. Your
donations are greatly appreciated and will help Israel win the media
battle. "Middle East Media Watch" (DBA HonestReporting) is a section
501(c)(3) tax-exempt organization, contributions to which are deductible
for U.S. income tax purposes. Please send contributions to:
156 West 56th Street, Suite 1201
New York, NY 10019 USA
Or you can donate online with your credit card, using our secure server:
HonestReporting was founded by a group of individuals interested in
ensuring that Israel receives fair, truthful coverage in the media. We
scrutinize the media for examples of blatant bias, distortion by omission,
etc., and then inform subscribers of any offending articles, asking them
to complain directly to the news organization involved.
HonestReporting as a matter of policy has no affiliation with any
political organization, and supports no position, party, or candidate of
the right or the left.
HonestReporting has 55,000 members worldwide, and is growing daily.
Spanish - http://prensaveraz.com/
Russian - http://honestreport.narod.ru
Italian - http://honestreportingitalia.com/
French readers may want to visit http://www.col.fr/news/desinformation/
(C) 2002 HonestReporting - All rights reserved.
To subscribe to HonestReporting, double-click and send a blank e-mail to:
mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org. Or use our form at:
© Copyright 2002 Joel Orr.
Last update: 7/29/02; 7:12:42 PM.