|
|
Friday, October 10, 2003
|
|
| |
One Way to Take Aggregators Mainstream.
Aggregators and Usability
"When we launched RSS feeds at Medscape, it was up to me to create the page that explains to physicians what the heck it's all about. That's when it really hit home that it's next to impossible to explain how this all works to people who are not intimately involved in blogging or working on the Net in some other way. I still get emails at least a few times a month that basically say, 'This sounds good, but what the heck do I need to do?'
I see three potential ways out of this logjam: 1) Wait for Aggregator vendors and RSS feed developers to come up with a better way to integrate their products so non-technical users can actually use them without getting buried in an avalanche of acronyms, right mouse clicks, and orange and white icons. 2) Wait for Microsoft to build RSS readers/aggregators into IE and/or Outlook. 3)Pursue an idea that came from Jenny at the BloggerCon aggregator session: 'pre-filled' news readers/aggregators. I'd be very interested in working with a freeware news reader/aggregator vendor to distribute, through Medscape, a special version of of their software, pre-filled with Medscape's 25+ news feeds to as many doctors as want it (my main candidates? AmphetaDesk and NetNewsWire Lite. Morbus? Brent?)." [Tales of Hoffman]
I'll reiterate what I said at the BloggerCon aggregators session: aggregators need to get easier to use. After that goal is achieved, they need to get easier to use, after which point they need to get easier to use. Then we can take them mainstream and start teaching "normal folks" to use them effectively and efficiently.
I think some of this can come from libraries, much the way we teach internet classes now. I mean, seriously - who exactly do you think is going to introduce aggregators to the public at large? If there was an easy-to-use aggregator, subscribing to sites was easier, more sites provided RSS feeds, and we came up with a usable alternative to a button that says "XML," I can see where a library might pre-populate it with local feeds from the library itself along with other local, relevant agencies.
At a university, the library could do this for students and faculty, especially by department. At a public library, this could be done for local residents (combining feeds for local government, local media, local schools, etc.). At a special library, it could be done for the organization's employees. And a school library could do this for both teachers and students (which might dovetail with some information literacy instruction). There could also be permanent links to an online reference service, reference databases, and the online catalog. And imagine the day we get secure authentication in aggregators, so library patrons can just enter their barcode numbers to subscribe to fee-based magazines, journals, or databases. [The Shifted Librarian]
7:26:30 PM
|
|
Dan Gillmor has cancelled his eMusic subscription, but I'm still hanging in there. I don't mind if I'm limited to a certain number of downloads a month, as long as the price is fair (works out to about a quarter a song). After all, if I wanted to over the last few months, I could have downloaded EMusic's entire collection - $9/month really doesn't seem like enough for that.
Why I've Cancelled my EMusic Subscription. I was becoming a fan of EMusic, the MP3 download service that a) treated people like non-thieves and b) had... [Dan Gillmor's eJournal]
7:23:49 PM
|
|
Super Science Fair Projects http://www.super-science-fair-projects.com/ The most useful thing about this site is the process it demonstrates, with a timeline, a project log, a step-by-step outline, a discussion of scientific method, and a feature on how judges think.
[Neat New Stuff]
7:15:29 PM
|
|
American Attitudes: Americans & the World http://www.americans-world.org/ "a source of comprehensive information on US public opinion on international issues," including its latest report on Misperceptions, the Media, and the Iraq War http://www.pipa.org/OnlineReports/Iraq/ Media_10_02_03_Report.pdf>, which shows that the news media in general, but some news sources more than others, have done a lousy job of conveying basic facts about the war.
[Neat New Stuff]
7:15:11 PM
|
|
|
|
© Copyright
2004
Gail Marsella.
Last update:
6/27/2004; 7:17:48 PM.
|
|
Weblog Portals
EatonWeb
Weblogs.com
Weblogs Compendium
Syndic8 RSS Feeds
SciTech News
Eurekalert
SciQuest
Wired
The Register
SciTech Daily
Science Fiction
Locus
SFBC
Fictionwise
Technovelgy
Commentary
Bookslut
Molly Ivins
Dissent Magazine
Mitch Albom
Andrew Sullivan
Andrew Leonard
The Onion
SatireWire
Morons.org
SoYouWanna
Slate
Salon
Bookstores
eCampus
Amazon
Mysterious Galaxy
Powell's
Bookfinder
AddAll
ABE Books
aLibris The Fearless Independents Blackwells (USA)
Fiber Arts
KimKat Textiles
Yoko Trading
Fabric Origami
Quilting Web
Community
Hollys Research Journal
My Technorati Profile
Ethics in Teaching
Blogging Truth and Beauty
The Space Betwixt the Twain
Andrew Grumets Weblog
Focused Performance
EightLinks
Due Diligence
Jeremy Zawodny
Information Commons Blog
Independents for Clark
Channeling Cupertino
Computers
Dans Data
|