Bone Lace
Stories in progress...books, science fiction, home, developing cultural issues, teaching.
















Subscribe to "Bone Lace" in Radio UserLand.

Click to see the XML version of this web page.

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


Friday, February 06, 2004
 

True, but below this link is my own take on why this might be true (recently sent to the Ask Amy column in the Chicago Tribune.)

"Everywhere people are less puritanical -- except in the U.S.". Legendary director Bernardo Bertolucci on America's sexual backwardness -- and why Jake Gyllenhaal wouldn't take off his clothes. [Salon.com]

*******

Dear Ms. Dickinson:

Please let me add to the discussion about whether pornography has any justification in a relationship. (The letter that started it was from "The Soon to be Wife"; most of the positive responses were from men, and most of the negative ones from women).

This seems to be a peculiarly American debate. The Far East has a long and healthy relationship with erotic pictures - in fact there is a very large body of art representing the subject, and Europe is much more open about it as well. I suspect, though, that what even the most Puritanical American women find offensive about pornography is not the sex, but the trashy depiction of it and the sense of being excluded. I have no objection to erotica (rather the reverse), but I do object to much of what passes for it.

Women are excited by this material, too. It's emphasis may differ - more romance, for example, or less of a need to show everything in clinical detail - but can women really say there aren't movie stars and co-workers who don't make them breathe a little harder? Or that they've never been turned on by a passage in a book or a scene in a movie? This is biology, and it's not restricted to men. If the low quality of the "pornography" offends you, bravo; there's a lot of violence, degradation, and humiliation out there masquerading as sex. (And if that's what your guy is looking at, dump him.) There is also much less good material for women or couples than for single men. (How about somebody does something to remedy that, and soon?) Finally, there's way too much "soft core" porn out in public (suggestive TV/billboard ads and so on) which removes the choice we should all have on where and when to view it.

That said, however, the emphasis shouldn't be on WHETHER he looks at pornography, but WHAT KIND and DOES HE SHARE IT WITH YOU?

By the way, I just turned 50, have been married for 22 years to the same man, and have 3 children.

Please sign me "Let's Grow Up, Shall We?"

Thanks for listening.


8:09:03 PM  comment []  Trackback []    


Click here to visit the Radio UserLand website. © Copyright 2004 Gail Marsella.
Last update: 6/27/2004; 7:20:42 PM.
February 2004
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29            
Jan   Mar

Weblog Portals
EatonWeb
Weblogs.com
Weblogs Compendium
Syndic8 RSS Feeds

SciTech News
Eurekalert
SciQuest
Wired
The Register
SciTech Daily

Science Fiction
Locus
SFBC
Fictionwise
Technovelgy

Commentary
Bookslut
Molly Ivins
Dissent Magazine
Mitch Albom
Andrew Sullivan
Andrew Leonard
The Onion
SatireWire
Morons.org
SoYouWanna
Slate
Salon

Bookstores
eCampus
Amazon
Mysterious Galaxy
Powell's
Bookfinder
AddAll
ABE Books
aLibris
The Fearless Independents
Blackwells (USA)

Fiber Arts
KimKat Textiles
Yoko Trading
Fabric Origami Quilting Web

Community
Hollys Research Journal
My Technorati Profile
Ethics in Teaching
Blogging Truth and  Beauty
The Space Betwixt the Twain
Andrew Grumets Weblog Focused Performance EightLinks
Due Diligence
Jeremy Zawodny
Information Commons Blog
Independents for Clark
Channeling Cupertino

Computers
Dans Data