|
|
Tuesday, February 08, 2005
|
|
| |
Celebrating the Body Beautiful. The human body is intriguing in all its forms. A photo exhibit features subjects both nude and clothed, giving us a complex picture of who we are as a species and as sexual beings. Commentary by Regina Lynn. [Wired News]
7:32:05 PM
|
|
Now I'm really worried...and I thought public education was bad before (even though I insist on sending my children there to meet others unlike themselves.)
Does the First Amendment go 'too far'?. The First Amendment grants too many freedoms, according to more than a third of US high school children. This is the disturbing conclusion of a new report by the Knight Foundation. [kuro5hin.org]
7:31:25 PM
|
|
Puijilittatuq, or just too many seals for one blogger to blog. The Inukitut have a word for it: "puijilittatuq." Translation: "He does not know which way to turn because of the many seals he has seen come to the ice surface."
That's a good description (from this month's issue of Ansible, the scifi newsletter from David Langford) of the blog-blockage typically caused by a fresh copy of Ansible.
Thank goodness, at least, that I'm not in Paris! Bloggers there will face the nightly temptation of being able to play mobile-phone-Tetris, using the lights on the Bibliotheque Nationale. (Thanks, Engadget!)
And check out Anil Dash's piece on "Information Bankruptcy." My favorite bit:
I learned that half of all bankruptcies in the United States are caused by medical bills, courtesy of Rebecca's link. I wish I had learned this from John Kerry about six months ago. This is the core of the health care debate in this country, not edge-case stem cell research. Modern political organizations have fantastic research resources available to them, but they squander these resources on finding weaknesses in their opponents... ... And I linked to Jay McCarthy's beautiful "Letter to Beatrice" from my del.icio.us linkblog, but never got around to pointing to it from here. Tiny sample:
In these paragraphs I will take Aristotle's classification, if for no other reason then to impress those who are so impressed, on friends: those of interest, of love, and of contemplation. This division is not always perfect, and thus many components could easily be rearranged, but how many books are in the Bible is much less important than their complete message--so I press onward... ... Now, you've got plenty to read, and I'm headed back to Thog's Masterclass... [Betsy Devine: Funny Ha-Ha or Funny Peculiar?]
7:29:45 PM
|
|
I like this lady already...
Is Mary Hodder brilliant or what? She and her friends go for a hike in the Los Altos Hills while TiVO records the SuperBowl. When they return, skip over the football and watch the commercials. Read that twice. [Scripting News]
7:28:50 PM
|
|
Well put, and high time someone figured this out...
Economics of Sharing.
Economics of Sharing: "Economists have not always found it easy to explain why self-interested people would freely share scarce, privately owned resources. Their understanding, though, is much clearer than it was 20 or 30 years ago: co-operation, especially when repeated, can breed reciprocity and trust, to the benefit of all. In the context of open source, much has been written about why people would share technical talent, giving away something that they also sell by holding a job in the information-technology industry. The reason often seems to be that writing open-source software increases the authors' prestige among their peers or gains them experience that might help them in the job market, not to mention that they also find it fun." Comment: The two biggest complaints directed at the open source movement are 1) it's anti-capitalism 2) it's not democratic. While I can see fanatical implementation of open source as fitting those categories, I think both assertions are generally false. Open source is a manner of openness and sharing. People are generating profits from open source software - the difference is that the value of the product has shifted. It's not about locking it...but positioning it for maximum creativity. Secondly, it terms of democracy, the very notion of open source is that everyone has a say, but, as with Linux, someone still has the final voice. While some may object, I think open source can be defined as a capitalistic, democratic process. Its key definition, however, is that it distributes power to many nodes, rather than limiting it to a central node. [elearnspace]
7:26:47 PM
|
|
What Exactly Is Under the Sea?. Even with today's advanced mapping technologies, old and sometimes secret data can lead to deadly surprises on the ocean floor. By Rowan Hooper. [Wired News]
7:25:23 PM
|
|
|
|
© Copyright
2005
Gail Marsella.
Last update:
2/21/2005; 5:53:51 PM.
|
|
| February 2005 |
| Sun |
Mon |
Tue |
Wed |
Thu |
Fri |
Sat |
| |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
| 6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
| 13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
| 20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
26 |
| 27 |
28 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Jan Mar |
Weblog Portals
EatonWeb
Weblogs.com
Weblogs Compendium
Syndic8 RSS Feeds
SciTech News
Eurekalert
SciQuest
Wired
The Register
SciTech Daily
Science Fiction
Locus
SFBC
Fictionwise
Technovelgy
Commentary
Bookslut
Molly Ivins
Dissent Magazine
Mitch Albom
Andrew Sullivan
Andrew Leonard
The Onion
SatireWire
Morons.org
SoYouWanna
Slate
Salon
Kyuboria
Bookstores
eCampus
Amazon
Mysterious Galaxy
Powell's
Bookfinder
AddAll
ABE Books
aLibris The Fearless Independents Blackwells (USA)
Fiber Arts
KimKat Textiles
Yoko Trading
Fabric Origami
Quilting Web
Community
Hollys Research Journal
My Technorati Profile
Ethics in Teaching
Blogging Truth and Beauty
The Space Betwixt the Twain
Andrew Grumets Weblog
Focused Performance
EightLinks
Due Diligence
Jeremy Zawodny
Information Commons Blog
Independents for Clark
Channeling Cupertino
Computers
Dans Data
|