Friday, August 27, 2004

eBooks and entrepreneurs.

eBooks are a great way for entrepreneurs to get noticed. Here's an update on what publishers have learned, and it's news you can use.

Have e-books turned a page?. Steady growth suggests that the publishing industry may finally have a grip on what readers want from electronic books. [CNET News.com]


9:30:25 AM    

The problem with collaborative learning.

I like what Evan has to say about collaborative learning; that in many 'real world' contexts collaboration is not encouraged and a reliance on collaboration can be a hindrance. It's a fair comment, and an experience I think most of us will have had. It's also a bit sad. But isn't this where education has a real opportunity to impact on real life... or are we blindly, collaboratively, heading down the wrong path?

[incorporated subversion]
9:09:50 AM    

Against collaboration.

Various webfeeds I follow link to an interesting post by Evan on the blog.IT blog in which she asks When do we need independent rather than collaborative learning? In South Africa outcomes based education has been official policy for a good number of years now - long enough for there to be a backlash against its perceived weaknesses, amongst others the emphasis on group work. So I fairly frequently hear students and others complain about being sick and tired of groups. The most common complaint is "I do all the work and the others are just passengers" - often voiced by several members of the same group. Half of me knows exactly what they're on about and wants to join them in their crusade against groups, but the other half knows that they've got it very wrong. Problem is, I struggle to explain why they're missing the point. Now Stephen Downes has come to my rescue in a comment on Evan's post, which is really so good that I have to quote it in full:

"This is the difference between being told to work in groups (and given a group to work in) and being able to work as an autonomous agent seeking and using collaboration on an as needed basis.

In the former, collaboration is determined to be, like trigonometry, something that is good for you, and so you approach it in a textbook fashion with all the steps mapped out.

Such preparation, as this item demonstrates, doesn't really leave a person prepared to collaborate (or to use trigonometry) in the real world. The knowledge needs to be accessed and deployed when needed, which means that you have to be able to determine for yourself when and how to access colleagues (or sine functions).

Certainly, in today's connected world, there is no case in which it is not possible to collaborate. Even if the job or the dissertation committee does not provide a nice structured environment, a person's skills in developing and working within a network ought to be sufficient to facilitate the support and learning structure necessary."

So I think I'll just print copies of that on index cards and dish them out next time I hear complaints about group work. Thanks Stephen (and Evan, and the other people who commented on her post).

By Martin Terre Blanche 27 Aug 2004 [Collaborative Learning]
9:08:35 AM    

Unfortunately, I am aware that my free, non-thread ....

Unfortunately, I am aware that my free, non-threading, 100-character limit commenting system is not designed for a discussion (I'm not pleased with what blogger is providing right now), so I'm pulling out comments from the previous post.

Stephen writes (emphasis is mine):

"This is the difference between being told to work in groups (and given a group to work in) and being able to work as an autonomous agent seeking and using collaboration on an as needed basis.

In the former, collaboration is determined to be, like trigonometry, something that is good for you, and so you approach it in a textbook fashion with all the steps mapped out.

Such preparation, as this item demonstrates, doesn't really leave a person prepared to collaborate (or to use trigonometry) in the real world. The knowledge needs to be accessed and deployed when needed, which means that you have to be able to determine for yourself when and how to access colleagues (or sine functions).

Certainly, in today's connected world, there is no case in which it is not possible to collaborate. Even if the job or the dissertation committee does not provide a nice structured environment, a person's skills in developing and working within a network ought to be sufficient to facilitate the support and learning structure necessary."


I absolutely agree with what is being said about the difference between the perception of collaboration (collaboration = groupwork) What most people consider collaboration is really just a bunch of people working in parallel to complete a task in the most efficient manner. I really appreciate the comment about using collaboration when collaboration is appropriate. I hate team sessions just for the sake of team sessions - I rarely feel like we get anything accomplished other than the line of the vita stating we participated.

And while I agree that it is technically possible for everyone to collaborate, is it also possible those fields that require confidentiality may truly discourage and punish those that do collaborate? And by thuse collaborating outside the accepted norms would be truly detrimental to one's career?

This is what intrigued me. I heard all the time that corporations want team players, and collaborators (especially when I was still working out there in that world). But here we have someone who appears prepared to honestly collaborate. And excited by it. Relying on it. And punished for it?

I don't think many people believe that their is one right answer for everyone at everytime. Like Jeremy, I used to be a big dreader of groupwork, both in school and on the job. I finally have a few co-workers that I trust and value enough to have some authentic collaboration with.

But I'm not sure how I would feel if after finally reaching the pinnacle of collaboration appreciation I realize that the world I was entering into took that ability away. I suppose it is the opposite of what we have now - a bunch of people accustomed to independant work, but unable to work in groups. I'm wondering however, if when the generation of "collaborators" comes out, that their working style will conflict with the working world. Let's face it - collaborating take a lot longer than individual work. How will this affect the future of business?

[blog.IT]
9:05:09 AM