This article from Yahoo highlights a personal dilemma of mine. The article has the CIA telling us that al Qaeda is a bigger threat than ever. It's more grist for the GeorgeW war mill. My dilemma is that I don't trust anything the government says any more. My dilemma is that I don't trust the "evidence" or the reasoning behind the current push to war.
On one hand we have 9-11-01: an overt act of war, for which someone and perhaps some country should pay. I'm for it; find the ringleaders and introduce them to the next life.
On the other hand, we have my entire life's experience with Federal Government and its limitless ability to corrupt people. I lived through Nixon and Watergate (a Republican you couldn't trust). I suffered through Clinton (a Democrat you couldn't trust). I currently suffer with the likes of Feinstein and Boxer "representing" my interests as a Californian. My entire adult life, the government has apologized every year for the lies and crimes committed 20 years previous.
My dilemma is that I suspect in 20 years, we'll hear the apology for the lies and bungling associated with Gov's handling of the current situation.
So is al Qaeda still a big threat, and are we justified in moving to a broader-scope war? Very likely, we'll never know for sure. That's a dilemma.
7:33:16 AM
|