<?xml version="1.0"?>
<!-- RSS generated by Radio UserLand v8.0.8 on Wed, 31 Jul 2002 16:43:20 GMT -->
<rss version="0.92">
	<channel>
		<title>BioBlondeBabe: Biotech</title>
		<link>http://radio.weblogs.com/0111188/categories/biotech/</link>
		<description>What&apos;s hot and what&apos;s not in the incestuous field of biotech.</description>
		<language>en</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2002 BioBlondeBabe</copyright>
		<lastBuildDate>Wed, 31 Jul 2002 16:43:20 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss092</docs>
		<managingEditor></managingEditor>
		<webMaster></webMaster>
		<cloud domain="radio.xmlstoragesystem.com" port="80" path="/RPC2" registerProcedure="xmlStorageSystem.rssPleaseNotify" protocol="xml-rpc"/>
		<item>
			<title>Clinical trial software will not speed drug discovery</title>
			<link>http://radio.weblogs.com/0111188/categories/biotech/2002/07/31.html#a4</link>
			<description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href=&quot;http://www.wired.com/news/technology/0,1282,54152,00.html&quot;&gt;An Rx for the Pharmaceuticals&lt;/A&gt;.&quot; Getting drugs to market is a costly process without the guarantee of success. Now a cottage industry is springing up to help the big boys save a little dough and pass FDA muster.&quot; By Kristen Philipkoski. [&lt;A href=&quot;http://www.wired.com/&quot;&gt;Wired News&lt;/A&gt;]&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Oh, my.&amp;nbsp; This is an article on &lt;A href=&quot;http://www.pharsight.com/&quot;&gt;Pharsight&lt;/A&gt;, a software product that is designed to optimize clinical trials.&amp;nbsp; The idea is to speed drug discovery by optimizing clinical trials&amp;nbsp; The product appears to be a biostatistician in a box.&amp;nbsp; Now, the authors of this article suggest that rational drug design and other modeling tools have sped up&amp;nbsp;early drug discovery.&amp;nbsp; I disagree.&amp;nbsp; There were many more new drugs brought to market before the advent of sophisticated computer tools then there are now.&amp;nbsp; Pharsight may be useful, but its impact on drug discovery will probably be minimal because most companies have statisticians on staff with a level of experience and sophistication than cannot be matched by a piece of software.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;in the discovery process clinical trial design is not rate limiting.&amp;nbsp; The real problem with drug discovery is the FDA and consumer expectations, not lack of tools.&amp;nbsp; In today&apos;s climate, aspirin and penicillin would not have been approved as drugs.&amp;nbsp; Aspirin has many side effects and penicillin can lead to life-threatening allergic reactions.&amp;nbsp; Today&apos;s consumer wants a &quot;magic bullet&quot;&amp;nbsp;- a drug that has no side-effects, no risk, can be taken once a day as a pill, and will completely cure their disease in a matter of days.&amp;nbsp; Promising compounds are constantly being&amp;nbsp;removed from consideration&amp;nbsp;because of potential side effects in animal trials.&amp;nbsp; Drugs that must be delivered by injection or taken more than twice a day are also deprioritized.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Pharsight will not change consumer expectations or the over-protective FDA.&amp;nbsp; It might help drug companies save money, but it will not bring drugs to market any faster.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
			<source url="http://www.wired.com/news_drop/netcenter/netcenter.rdf">Wired News</source>
			</item>
		</channel>
	</rss>

