I've been trying to figure out the best way to present my notes from Educause,
but I'm not going to have time to do anything but slap them up as is. Here is
the first one, some notes from a very interesting session by the folks at Berkeley's
Interactive University:
Creating
Learning Objects from Research Content to Open the University
Wednesday, October 02, 2002
3:50 p.m. - 4:40 p.m.
Berkeley Interactive University
Open Learning Environments
Learning Objects
The Teacher’s Box
Every school teacher possesses a box full of hand-collected teaching materials,
“stuff” gathered over the years from various and ephemeral sources.
Stored in closets and garages, these primary source materials—pictures,
maps, news articles, short stories, speeches, graphs, and charts—are carefully
guarded…
Collections of images, articles, maps, video (w/transcription and hyperlinked
sections of interviews, etc.) chicken parts (using various pieces to make your
own whole).
--
after you have a collection, you might create…
Album (order, annotate, etc.)
Share album—peer reviewed—other teachers can use my object
--
Create an environment that allows sharing of objects, knowledge,
--
Creating Structured Content – Research and Learning Objects
A culture and process of building and sharing digital objects for multiple uses
Both individual faculty and large collections
Authoring technologies for markup
Support structures, funding, incentives
Intellectual property
Many big issues…what do we mean by Ros and LOs (theory of content)
Markup?
Intellectual Property?
--
For B-OLE the ideal web content would be:
Easily found with meaningful terms
Contain information about university and K-12 use
Modular, granular, “chunkable”
Small and simple, large and complex
Capable of modification, combination, annotation
Some stuff just content; some stuff for learning
…
Digital content object – something you can find (URL)…need to talk
aobut metadata (XML?)
--
Autodesk Content Strategy (stack/flow) www.learnativity.com
Research and Learning Objects
Digital Content -> Research Objects -> Learning Objects -> Modules
Materials from museums—how can it be structured for additional value?
Chaos theory
Content (image) -> add metadata (research objects) -> combine into meaningful
structure (learning objects)
--
Raymond Yee
Technology Architecture Diagram
What architecture would have to underlie the initiatives?
Central scenario – allow teachers to gather diverse materials from diverse
sources and easily incorporate them in to learning environment
1 Web Browsers
2 Desktop apps/Web apps
3 Inputs
4 Products
5 Services
6 Digital Libraries
7 Individual or teams of scholars
Don’t want to have to build all of these parts—nobody knows how
to build all of them.
Want to work with content repositories, developers.
MIT is looking for publishing process---
--
Library, Educational Technology, RSS Interoperability
Librairies/Digital Repositories (METS)
Educational Technologies (IMS, SCORM)
Web Content Syndication (XHTML, RSS, OPML)
Commercial and Open Source Productivity Tools (Microsoft Office)
Need to have systems that will allow materials to flow from one community to
another.
--
Examples of MOA2 (Making Of America 2) and IMS packages
METS = content packaging standard
Crosswalks
Translate XML from one standard to another
MOA2 -> LRN
Microsoft LRN viewer (learning management system)
Library and Educational Technology worlds must come up with standards for translation.
--
The Ideal World : A Technical Perspective
Publish your materials in XML
Look for standards
There is not perfect markup
Consider offering a web service to your collection
Ask tool vendors to open up their data frameworks and programming interfaces.
Favor tools that are highly interoperable.
--
Ideals
Collaborative design of structured content that works for faculty and K-12 teachers
Collaboration with major related initiatives…
Quote from Creative Commons
6:59:36 PM
|
|