Book Reviews


[Day Permalink] Tuesday, February 4, 2003

[Item Permalink] Macs and bioinformatics -- Comment()
Richard Gayle writes: "Apple and the Mac are making a huge push in bioinformatics. [...] Last year at the first of these BioCon meetings I noticed a big shift. The number of Macs was up to maybe 50%. It looked like people had titaniums if they could afford it, and iBooks if not. Finally, the developers who needed Unix could get not only the OS they needed (OS X) but also a cool piece of hardware. They loved it. [...] Apple[...] has a very big presence at the meetings. The computer room, open to all, has over 20 computers, either iMacs or towers. I got to use a 23 inch flat screen (So gooooood!) and to test out Safari (pretty nice) and take a look at Keynote (I'm hooked.) If the IT researchers at universities that are developing all the bioinformatics tools want Macs, it could be a huge tipping point for the adoption of these computers. It may not hurt MS but it could have an affect on Sun."


[Item Permalink]  -- Comment()
Total Information Delusion:
The Pentagon's Total Information Awareness (TIA) project may have stalled due to opposition in Congress, but even if the effort goes forward, many computer scientists doubt the effectiveness of the technology. [...] TIA leader John Poindexter underestimates the complexity of understanding human behavior, especially since computers today still do not fully grasp language. The Information Awareness Office Poindexter runs contains 12 other programs besides TIA [...] Palo Alto Research Center computer scientist Francine Chen says that even a relatively accurate technology would produce too many false positives to be useful when applied to a population of approximately 300 million people. [...] Lunt concedes that no technology can provide 100 percent privacy protection.
For information about ACM's U.S. Public Policy Committee, visit http://www.acm.org/usacm


[Item Permalink]  -- Comment()
From Nanotechnology's Sidelines, One More Warning (site requires registration):
The ETC group recently released an 80-page illustrated manifesto demonstrating the potential dangers of nanotechnology, if corporate research and development is allowed to proceed unchecked. Rather than fearing the popular scenario of the human race being inundated by tiny, self-replicating robots, ETC executive director Pat Roy Mooney envisions environmental damage and diseases brought about by the cumulative effects of artificial particles within biological systems. He does not believe nanotech is inherently evil, but he wants a moratorium declared on nanotech research and commercialization until international resolutions to evaluate and monitor its potential dangers are set up. [...] Roco and others insist that the potential environmental and health impacts of nanotech are being addressed, and advise against a research moratorium, arguing that it would hinder scientific research of existing nanoparticles and postpone the potential benefits of new nanotech-based products.


[Item Permalink]  -- Comment()
EU backs poor farmers' seed use: "The European Union is proposing two far-reaching curbs on the power of the biotechnology industry. It says companies seeking patents should have to say where they found any natural product they are appropriating." [Google Technology News]