|
Monday, January 30, 2006 |
I'd like to echo Niklas's sentiments; make learning JMS your new years resolution. Many developers don't get MOM/JMS yet;
the ability to loosely couple processing across time and technology
using a highly asynchronous (SEDA style) way, to load balance requests
reliably across clusters of machines in a high performance way and to achieve publish and
subscribe with a variety of qualities of service as well as working
well in XA or transactional contexts.
It takes a little while for the penny to drop I think; folks in finance
and telco have been doing MOM/JMS for years and years; I've noticed
lots of the large e-tailers these days are very JMS focussed; maybe its
time to dip your toe in the JMS pool? Go on, download ActiveMQ today and play :)
BTW if you don't wanna spend time learning the JMS API then just stick to POJOs and let Lingo do the hard work for you.
One minor nit with the original article is that Ajax can work very nicely with a JMS provider too - using queues and topics from Ajax; as well as other languages like C/C++, C# or Ruby
12:13:40 PM
|
|
© Copyright 2007 James Strachan.
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 2006 |
Sun |
Mon |
Tue |
Wed |
Thu |
Fri |
Sat |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
26 |
27 |
28 |
29 |
30 |
31 |
|
|
|
|
Dec Feb |
|
|
|
|
|
|