Zane has refuted an argument I made earlier about his claims that the media is biased and the right is better at politicking being off base.  Apparently what was meant as a good natured jab (that stuff about the "claims of genius") may have been taken a bit too literally.  That is the problem of the communicator (myself) and if that is the case I apologize.  Text of course, is a poor place to stage a conversational debate.  Zane, your intelligence was never meant to be questioned, and you are absolutely right, the article of yours that I cited made no mention of your genius.  That was why I chose the wording I did and the article that I did, I hoped that it would make the meaning a bit easier to construe.  I think if you take that last phrase out of my original argument, it becomes a lot less ad hominem.

Anyway, Zane makes some good points, some bad points, and some in between.  I'll get to all those later today.  It's Monday and I gotta get this party started yo!

9:36:30 AM  #