|
|
Tuesday, April 15, 2003 |
|
Windley seconds and improves upon Dave Winer's arguement to extend the use of OPML in directories.
comment [] 9:40:30 AM |
|
Not enough time today to comment. But, these are good... Rick Bruner: The B2B Power of Blogs. Rick points to Richard Karpinski's Corporate Blogs make personal connection, in Crain's B2B Marketing. Both Rich and Rick quote me rather extensively. I'm glad what I said got published, because it's a late response to some questions about corporate blogging that Joi asked me quite a while ago and I've been slow to answer. [The Doc Searls Weblog]comment [] 9:31:40 AM |
|
No wait for tools. The really cool thing about this kind of directory isn't the format, OPML is designed to be unremarkable. When people look at the OPML files and criticize them I know they don't understand OPML, but I wish they did. They're looking at the roots of a tree, when the interesting stuff is happening in the canopy, in the tree-tops. Here's what's different. There's no need to wait for a tool to edit this format, because the tool existed before the format. This is flipped around from all other XML formats, where it may or may not be possible to create a tool. We know of several good outliners that support OPML. And outliners are a tool of choice for people who think, people who have information that we want in directories. It's a clever plan! Hey if you want to know about outliners, ask Larry Lessig. Lawyers love them. Soon so will librarians.
comment [] 9:22:07 AM |
|
Am already doing this. But, this is good info for those implementing blogs.. OPML.Org: How To implement an OPML directory browser. [Scripting News] comment [] 9:20:49 AM |

