Notes on Kevin Werbach & Jeremy Allaire
Yesterday, Kevin Werbach (http://werbach.com/blog/) published this little tidbit in response to Jeremy Allaire:
Lots of people agree we need to get beyond HTML and the page-based browser interface. Only three companies, however, have large enough distribution to have a realistic shot at getting there with a software client: Microsoft, Sun, and Macromedia. (Napster might have in a parallel universe, but 'twas not to be.)
Java seems destined to be a crucial piece of back-end infrastructure but a bit player on the client side. Flash has >90% penetration, and it's on devices like Tivo and mobile phones as well as PCs. If something other than Internet Explorer is going to be the interface of the future, Flash is most likely to succeed. Not that it will be easy. It's a risky strategy for Macromedia, because it goes away from the company's traditional focus and puts it directly in Microsoft's cross-hairs. But the payoff could be huge. The back-end hooks and runtime are in place. What's missing, so far, are compelling applications. Jeremy?
This is an interesting perspective. I agree that Java on the client has been very limited, but a JVM exists in over 75% of the browsers out there. Meanwhile, the oft-quoted Flash statistics fails to take into account that many versions of flash are included in that 90%. In order to run the new stuff that Jeremy is pushing, you need to download the latest version. Additionally, Java has a much higher foothold in the burgeoning device space. According to market analyst VDC, 64 million Java enabled devices will ship this year. By 2005, the number is expected to be close to 400 million devices (according to Cahner's In-Stat). It would take some significant work to get Flash into that market. My money is on Java. 
11:57:15 AM
|
|