Mike Snider's Formal Blog and Sonnetarium :
Poems, mostly metrical, and rants and raves on poetry and the po-biz.
Updated: 1/24/06; 9:59:38 PM.

 

ME & MINE







AIM: poemando



POETRY SITES & ZINES




















WORKSHOPS & CONFERENCES







RESOURCES










NON-POETRY BLOGS












POET'S SITES: MOSTLY BLOGS
























































































































































Subscribe to "Mike Snider's Formal Blog and Sonnetarium" in Radio UserLand.

Click to see the XML version of this web page.

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.

 
 

Tuesday, May 6, 2003

Newsweek, or at least Bruce Wexler at Newsweek, says poetry is dead and nobody cares: "It is difficult to imagine a world without movies, plays, novels and music, but a world without poems doesn't have to be imagined." He lives in it. "Poetry," he says, "is designed for an era when people valued the written word and had the time and inclination to possess it in its highest form," but people no longer have "the patience to read a poem 20 times before the sound and sense of it takes hold. They aren't willing to let the words wash over them like a wave, demanding instead for the meaning to flow clearly and quickly. They want narrative-driven forms, stand-alone art that doesn't require an understanding of the larger context."

Well, gag me with a spoon. If you have to read a poem 20 times before you understand its basic movement, either you or the poem is stupid—and odds are it's the poem. Even Pound, the Father of Obscurity, said poetry should be at least as well written as prose. That's not to say you won't find new understanding the 20th time you read a poem, but good poetry gives immediate sensual pleasure, however dark or subtle or complicated it turns out to be.

There's another problem: Wexler doesn't seem to allow anything but greatness onto Parnassus's slope. A poem which doesn't induce ecstatic union with the something or other simply won't do, and so he deprives himself of a good part of the joy of reading poems. Think of that same attitude applied to reading novels or watching movies. How dreary to have nothing but Tolstoy and Woolf, or only Bergman and Kurosawa. Hooray for minor poetry!

But it's just as bad to expect poetry to express "disdain for symbol, for metaphor, for all the Sophomore-English-Class ways poems mean," as Slate's Dan Chiasson described Frank O'Hara's poetry last week. Unfortunately, he meant it as praise. I'm quite certain O'Hara was a remarkable person to know. His poetry is utterly unremarkable. His two best known poems can be read here and here. "The Day Lady Died" ends well; "Why I Am Not A Painter" is just embarrassing.

Somewhere between those two attitudes it's possible to honor craft and innovation, intelligence and feeling, the sublime and the silly.


8:12:49 PM    comment: use html tags for formatting []  trackback []

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

2006 Michael Snider.



Click here to visit the Radio UserLand website.
 




May 2003
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
        1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30 31
Apr   Jun


ARCHIVES

Dec 2005
Nov 2005
Oct 2005
Sep 2005
Aug 2005
Jul 2005
Jun 2005
May 2005
Apr 2005
Mar 2005
Feb 2005
Jan 2005
Dec 2004
Nov 2004
Oct 2004
Sep 2004
Aug 2004
Jul 2004
Jun 2004
May 2004
Apr 2004
Mar 2004
Feb 2004
Jan 2004
Dec 2003
Nov 2003
Oct 2003
Sep 2003
Aug 2003
Jul 2003
Jun 2003
May 2003
Apr 2003
Mar 2003
Feb 2003
Jan 2003
Dec 2002
Nov 2002
Oct 2002
Sep 2002