Unless you're just blogging to exercise your writing skills, or to communicate with a few friends, you're in the publishing business, and you have readers who hope, or expect, that your blog, just like any other publication, will be valuable to them. Information science identifies two ways that published works can provide value to readers: They can inform, or they can entertain. Most newspapers and magazines have articles that do each. As anyone who reads How to Save the World regularly can attest, I'm no expert on writing for entertainment. I'll leave it up to others to offer advice on how to write entertaining blogs (though I have no doubt that good stories are an important component of many entertaining articles, columns and blog posts). Most blogs aspire to inform, in one way or another, and that's something I do know a little about. The word inform means, literally, to put form around, to flesh out. The 'value chain' at left, another artifact of information science, shows the stages that we go through in the process of becoming informed. A blog that takes us from one stage to the next informs us -- and therefore has value. Here are the four ways that this can happen: - Aggregation/Research: This is the process of pulling together, compiling data. It's what a reporter does. Who, what, when, where, why, how. Just the facts, ma'am. It's research. It's hard work, a lot of digging. Example: Billmon or Kriselda go back and find out what someone said two years ago that's still archived in some obscure publication or cache, which proves the Bush Administration has been lying/up to no good.
- Synthesis: This is the process of distilling and organizing information to provide context for understanding it better. It's what news writers and editors do. Charts and tables are also examples of syntheses. Example: I took the aggregated data on US incomes and produced this power chart.
- Analysis: This is the process of deconstructing the information to reveal what it means, what it implies. It requires not only an understanding of the information and its context, but also broad and/or deep expertise about the related subject matter: politics, economics, history etc. It's the domain of experts and specialists: business gurus, professors, and lifelong students of specific domains of knowledge. Example: The New Yorker does in-depth analysis like this, while newspaper op-eds (and blog rants like this one of Rayne's) provide more cursory and subjective, but still valuable (and often entertaining as well) analysis.
- Prescription: This is the process of advising and/or persuading the reader what actions or responses are appropriate in light of the analysis. The analyst may conclude with a prescription that follows from the analysis, or the appropriate action or reaction may be obvious or tacit, or the analyst may not presume to offer a prescription, and instead leave this final step up to the reader. Example: Here is my recent prescription for education reform.
None of these four ways of informing the reader is inherently better or more valuable than the others, nor is it always advantageous (or even advisable) to try to do more than one of them in any single article. But you'll generally find that the best publications, and the A-list bloggers, tend to do (at least) one of them very well. So, at the risk of taking all the fun and uncertainty out of your blogging, and being accused again of saying there's a right and wrong way to blog (there isn't -- there are no rules, OK?) here's a scorecard you can use to assess the 'information value' of your posts: Criterion
| Applicable?
| Achieved?
| Appropriate research done, facts checked, citations given
|
|
| Article presents new information, or presents it in a new way/light
|
|
| Layout and organization is clear and concise
|
|
| Graphics used if (and only if) they improve understanding
|
|
| Aggregation/summarization saves readers time reading other stuff
|
|
| Article adds something unique that readers don't get elsewhere
|
|
| Analysis helps reader see the meaning/significance of the issue
|
|
| Arguments/solutions presented are logical and/or persuasive
|
|
| New ideas, perspectives, useful tools or ways of thinking are introduced
|
|
| Heading, intro help readers assess their interest in reading further
|
|
| I've been using it for awhile -- checking off the 3-4 things I'm trying to accomplish in the middle column before I start writing each post (which 3-4 vary from post to post), and then just before posting scoring myself on how well I've achieved each of those 3-4 objectives. It's caused me to 'pull' a few posts that didn't measure up, and miss a few days posting, but it's for the better. I'm also realizing that time pressures recently are negatively impacting my 'scores', and the quality of what you read on this blog. The drop in comments and hits shows you realize that too. I'll try to get back to full stride as soon as work (and other writing) pressures ease off, and I appreciate your patience in the meantime.
|