July 2004
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
        1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30 31
Jun   Aug

 Tuesday, July 13, 2004
Greatest Danger But Reich concludes his article with a stunning and surprising paragraph, which I'll cite here verbatim:
The great conflict of the 21st century will not be between the West and terrorism. Terrorism is a tactic, not a belief. The true battle will be between modern civilization and anti-modernists; between those who believe in the primacy of the individual and those who believe that human beings owe their allegiance and identity to a higher authority; between those who give priority to life in this world and those who believe that human life is mere preparation for an existence beyond life; between those who believe in science, reason, and logic and those who believe that truth is revealed through Scripture and religious dogma. Terrorism will disrupt and destroy lives. But terrorism itself is not the greatest danger we face.
Via Mark D. Roberts

I got this link via Donald Sensing. I have been personally questioning the validity of the secular viewpoint as a primary foundation of public policy. I do not think this was the intention of the founding fathers. The Protestant Reformation was still vivid in their minds. I continue to think that our "enhancements" to the secular viewpoint would not be appreciated by the founding fathers and are not the basis for good public policy. I do believe in the separation of Church and State but not when it encourages bad public policies. In this case Robert Reich attempts to argue the case for an increased secularization of the government and public policies. In reality when reasonably open minded people read his words and begin to understand the superficiality of his arguements, they see why the secular viewpoint is not popular with the common folks and makes for poor public policy. Public policy derived from this increasingly secular viewpoint just do not seem to work.

I think one of the most obvious failures of this increasingly secularized public policy is genocide. In this information age it is hard not to know when your brother is suffering and yet we do nothing. It is hard to find the moral high ground in arguing for science, reason, and logic when a couple hundred thousand people are massacred in Rwanda. Unfortunately this scenario keeps repeating itself. Science, reason, and logic are important but not sufficient to deal with the various human tragedies. Ignoring these tragedies is our greatest danger because they provide the breeding ground for the next civil conflict and the next group of desperate people.
Comments [] TrackBack [] 12:01:38 PM Google It!    

RE: Cherish Your Wars Okay, I confess that I enjoy the humor at Imao. Someday I will repent.

Though some think the Iraq War wrong, I think Iraq war right just like Bush. I even came up with a bunch of reasons:

* Lots of Iraqis are dead - bad ones!

* It made for good T.V.

* Saddam was an evil man and now he's dead - or at least he will be after due process of law.

* Since the war on Iraq, there have been no Iraqi attacks on American soil.

* Instead of having to travel all over the world to track down and shoot terrorists, they flocked to Iraq for us to shoot them in one place.

* "Iraq" and "attack" rhyme, so war just makes sense.

* Now the most potent Weapon of Mass Destruction currently in Iraq is the U.S. military.

* Since Iraq will now have its own democracy, maybe they will import some of our slimy weasels.

* By having so much anger in the Middle East directed at us, we've given the Jews a break.

* If it weren't for the war, the election would be all about dumb crap like Medicare and gay marriage.

* Setting Iraq free from tyranny sets the course for the rest of the Middle East to evolve into modern democracies by 4012.

* The war made Michael Moore angry... hopefully bringing him closer to his inevitable heart attack (I just hope he doesn't fall on any children).

* We pissed most of the world off, and, frankly, we hate most of the world and like pissing them off.

* If we waited to attack until we had France's permission, we would have to hold off until most of Europe was invaded by Iraq… which could have taken months longer.

* With all the practice liberating Iraq, Iran, which is an only one letter difference, should be easy.

* Dude, we like so killed Uday and Qusay.

* Oil! Sweet, sweet oil! Muh ha ha ha!

* Lot's of bad people are dead; what's not to be happy about?

[Via IMAO]
Comments [] TrackBack [] 10:35:05 AM Google It!    

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License. The licensor permits others to copy, distribute, display, and perform the work. In return, licensees must give the original author credit.

Valid HTML 4.01! Creative Commons License Click here to visit the Radio UserLand website. Subscribe to "a lazy cowboy" in Radio UserLand. Click to see the XML version of this web page. Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.