| September 2004 | ||||||
| Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat |
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |||
| 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 |
| 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 |
| 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 |
| 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | ||
| Aug Oct | ||||||
In this article Bernard Goldberg highlights probably the fundamental problem in rathgate, media bias has probably permanently damaged the reputation of journalism. This bias has led experienced journalists down a path to make decisions that novice journalists would not make. I have to admit that I did not consider media bias a problem until I started comparing the news I read from the internet with that from the major news media this year. Part of the problem was that I ignored the major news media because I preferred news presented by PBS for reasons I never investigated until this year. The reason I finally realized that media bias existed and was not a phony issue was because of my wife. Over the last couple of years she gradually became interested in discussing current events. Since we do not get a newspaper and she is an internet neophyte, her only source of information is the major media news. Guess what? She started getting mad. When I tried to guide her to PBS for a more balanced news, she got mad at me. When I look at these events in retrospect I feel sorry for Dan Rather and John Kerry. Dan is trying to blame others but it was his foolish mistake. I feel sorry for John since once again his campaign messages got drowned out by his "friends". As they say in the military, "Friendly fire isn’t friendly".
Comments [] TrackBack []
9:11:44 AM Google It!
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License. The licensor permits others to copy, distribute, display, and perform the work. In return, licensees must give the original author credit.
