Craig Cline's Blog

September 2004
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30    
Aug   Oct


 Tuesday, September 07, 2004
netflix via tivo?. Newsweek reports that Netflix and TiVO are looking at a deal to allow users to download movies to their TiVOs over the net. I'm sure MPAA will have something to say about this. If ti... [Meerkat: An Open Wire Service]
5:49:46 PM    

Hot air on the ballooning deficit. The Bush White House has long exhibited a penchant for Orwellian rhetoric, but its perversely cheerful reaction to recent gloomy economic news is remarkable even by its own standards. Last week, when the Labor Department reported that only 144,000 jobs were created in August -- far fewer than the 300,000 that the White House had earlier predicted -- administration officials appeared quite pleased by the news, concluding from the number that the economy is now moving "in the right direction." And they were happy once again today, when the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office announced that the 2004 federal budget will hit a record $422 billion in deficits. Because the CBO's estimate is $56 billion lower than the prediction the agency made in March, a Bush campaign spokesman told reporters that the new data is "a sign of the economic growth that is a result of President Bush's leadership on tax relief." [Salon.com]
5:48:10 PM    

This is an interesting Investment Newsletter that I receive - I used to consider it spam but now read it regularly.

What We Now Know
Week of 8/30/04

IN THIS ISSUE

Karl Rove: The Bush Dynasty's Rasputin
Ethanol Subsidies
Are You Aspirin-Resistant?
Osama bin Laden's Kidneys


**********************************************

KARL ROVE: THE BUSH DYNASTY'S RASPUTIN

Quick, name the biggest force to hit politics in the past century. The New Deal? The Cold War? Extremist terrorism?

How about a stout, bespectacled Texan named Karl Rove.

Never heard of Rove? Neither have most Americans. (In fact, many don't even know what he looks like, so here's a photo.) As a senior White House staffer Rove is a rare breed--a lurker, content to hang back in the shadows while Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, and Powell dominate the media. But Rove's anonymity belies his status; he is, by many accounts, the most powerful person in America.

So who exactly is this man, and how did he come to exert such near-tidal influence on Washington?

Unlike most of his political compatriots, Karl Rove didn't have the benefit of pedigree. He grew up following his geologist father up and down the Rocky Mountains. But what he lacked in social prestige, Rove made up for in drive. At age nine, he was a sworn Nixon supporter--his mind already focused on the politics that would become his life's obsession.

Rove's real gift however, a penchant for political trickery, didn't become apparent until his teenage years, when he happened to be in Illinois while a particularly tight race for state treasurer was raging. According to the Guardian, Rove showed up at the campaign headquarters of Democratic candidate Alan Dixon, and, unnoticed by staff, pocketed a sheaf of letterhead.

Soon afterward, the stationary began turning up in Chicago's red light district, bearing invitations for "free beer, free food, girls and a good time for nothing." The promised locale of this debauchery: candidate Dixon's campaign headquarters, where hundreds of less than desirable characters converged during a gala reception. Dixon was embarrassed, although he still won the election.

But it wasn't long until Rove's cunning would pay dividends. In 1973, while attending the University of Utah, he ran against Robert Edgeworth for the chairmanship of the College Republicans. Rather than face the popular Edgeworth head-on, Rove devised an ingenious approach: he challenged his opponent's every campaign move on technical grounds.

With a keen understanding of politicking, Rove waged a war of attrition against Edgeworth's campaign team--causing the disqualification of candidate after candidate on minor technicalities. In the end the Republican National Committee had no choice but to name Rove the election's victor.

The shrewd campaign got Rove noticed by the Republican Committee's chairman at the time--a then unseasoned politician named George Herbert Walker Bush. The elder Bush latched onto this "boy genius", giving Rove something he badly wanted: contacts with the biggest political names in Texas. After these introductions, Rove was off and running, opening a political consulting firm in Austin and quickly attracting the state's most prominent Republicans as clients.

In those days, Texas was a Democratic stronghold. It had been over a century since a Republican sat in the governor's seat. Rove immediately set about changing things, helping GOP candidates systematically take nearly all of the state's political posts.

A pivotal moment in this makeover came during the 1986 race for the governorship, a contest between Rove's client Bill Clements and Democratic incumbent Mark White. When polls showed the contest was too close to call, Rove reportedly dipped into his bag of tricks, publicly announcing that he had found an electronic listening device in his office. Which cast suspicion on the Democrats and tipped the election in Clements' favor. No evidence corroborating Rove's allegation ever surfaced.

Eight years later, Rove's scheming would benefit another gubernatorial candidate: George W. Bush. According to the Guardian, in the final days of Bush's race against Democrat Anne Richards, Texas voters began receiving "polling" calls, inquiring, "Would you be more or less likely to vote for Governor Richards if you knew her staff is dominated by lesbians?" Once again, insinuation won the day, and Bush was elected governor. Afterwards, Richards' campaign advisor George Shipley observed, "Rove has used this kind of dirty tricks in every campaign he's ever run."

During his time in Texas, Rove had developed a reputation for breaking friendships as quickly as he formed them. Not so with George W. Bush, with whom Rove was smitten the day they met. Describing his first impressions of Bush in a New Yorker interview, Rove said, "He was exuding more charisma than any one individual should be allowed to have."

This attention from Rove turned out to be all Bush would need to rise to America's top office. In 2000, after becoming George Jr.'s presidential campaign advisor, Rove, according to the New Yorker, turned his vitriol on GOP leadership rival John McCain, spreading rumors that McCain had been a traitor during the Vietnam war, and had fathered a child out of wedlock by a prostitute. In no time, Bush was anointed the Republican presidential candidate.

During the 2000 election, more developments would surface bearing the so-called "Mark of Rove". In a move echoing the 1986 office-bugging scandal, a news story was leaked about an advertising rep for the Bush campaign who had been arrested for sending to Gore headquarters a tape of Bush practicing for a debate. The tape did indeed show up at Gore's office, and the Democrats had to fight bad publicity.

When Bush finally gained the Oval Office, Rove's help was not forgotten. The nerdy, middle-class kid became chief strategist to the Republican government, wielding an influence that quickly became the stuff of legends and whispers. "Little happens on any issue without Karl's OK," wrote former presidential advisor John Dilulio in a 2001 e-mail to Esquire magazine. The New Yorker notes that the Democrats "use 'Rove' as shorthand for 'the Bush Administration' as in, 'Is Rove going to invade Syria?'"

But Rove's tendency to operate behind the scenes makes such speculation about his power just that--speculation. As Time.com put it, "Few people know exactly where or whether the perception of his clout diverges from reality."

Of course, his propensity for smear campaigns isn't the only thing keeping Rove ensconced in the White House; in a game as full-contact as politics, both parties have plenty of people to do the muckraking. Rather, Rove has distinguished himself as, in the words of Bush PR rep Mark McKinnon, the "Bobby Fischer of politics," who, "sees about 20 moves ahead." It was, according to Metro Beat, Rove who in the wake of 9/11, seized upon the political advantages his party could draw from terrorism, telling Bush, "We can go to the country on this issue because they trust the Republican Party to do a better job of... protecting America."

So now that Rove's attained nearly ultimate political power, what's next for the man known as "Bush's brain"? Priority number one, obviously, is getting his boss re-elected in November... true to the principle "All's fair in love and war".

But Rove's agenda may in fact be much larger. As a recent New Yorker profile put it, "The real prize is creating a Republican majority that would... last for a generation and... wind up profoundly changing the relationship between citizen and state."

He may not be far from this lofty goal. The Guardian observes, "The Republicans now control the presidency, the Senate, and the House of Representatives. Rove's task now is to... recast Washington's third source of power, the supreme court, from its current cautious conservatism to a more red-blooded Republicanism." According to the New Yorker, he is doing just that, with the Senate now confirming an average of six Bush-nominated (and reportedly Rove-selected) federal judges a month.

If this pattern continues, the America of Karl Rove may soon be at hand.


OSAMA BIN LADEN'S KIDNEYS

The enigmatic Osama bin Laden, alleged mastermind of the 9/11 attacks, still haunts the land like a boogeyman, held responsible by many for every major terrorist move on the planet, from the uprisings in Iraq and Saudi Arabia to the bomb attack in Madrid, Spain. Fact is, though, there hasn't been a verified new message from bin Laden since December 2001. Most experts think he may be dead; others, including some U.S. intelligence officials, are not so sure.

What We Now Know has been sifting through the various sources to get a closer look at the truth.

The last confirmed video, aired three months after the WTC attacks, shows a gaunt, gray-bearded bin Laden with hollow eyes--to all appearances, a gravely ill man. Rumors about the al-Qaeda leader suffering from a debilitating kidney disease had been out for years: in March 2000, Pakistani students of Islam supposedly offered to donate kidneys to bin Laden; eyewitnesses described him as "coughing frequently" and "easily exhausted"; various anonymous members of the intelligence community announced "This man is dying", stating that his followers had tried to find a dialysis machine for their leader. In September 2001, Moosa Wardak, an Afghan doctor, had allegedly traveled to India to buy some medical equipment for his patient bin Laden, a rumor confirmed by another "unnamed intelligence source" who claimed that a dialysis machine had been bought earlier in 2001 and shipped to Kandahar. And New York Times writer William Safire contended that in mid-May of 2001, Saddam Hussein's personal physician, Dr. Khayal, had visited the terminally ill Saudi.

Even though the Taliban, as well as bin Laden himself, claimed that his kidneys were just fine, there seemed to be too much dependable information coming from too many different, unrelated sources to regard the terrorists' claims as anything but propagandist blather.

The September 11 attacks opened the floodgates to unrestrained speculation when Pakistan's President, Gen. Pervez Musharraf, asserted that Osama had surely died from kidney failure because he had been unable to get treatment for his severe condition.

In January 2002, CNN medical correspondent Dr. Sanjay Gupta tooted the same horn, analyzing the "frosting of the appearance", which could be associated with kidney failure, renal failure, etc. "He's also not moving his arms," said Gupta. "The reason that might be important is because people who have had a stroke--and certainly people are at increased risk of stroke if they also have kidney failure--he may have had a stroke and therefore is not moving his left side."

"Renal dialysis [hemodialysis] is something reserved for patients in end-stage renal failure. That means their kidneys have just completely shut down." According to Gupta, there is no way that bin Laden could have handled the process of dialysis hiding out in a cave: "Dialysis machines require electricity,... clean water... a sterile setting--infection is a huge risk with that." Also required would be several experts, "someone who really knows how to run that dialysis machine... someone who's actually assessing his blood... to see what particular dialysate he would need, and to be able to change his dialysate as needed. So you'd need a kidney specialist, a technician--quite a few people around him."

At the end of December '01, the Egyptian paper al-Wafd ran an article on bin Laden's purported funeral, reporting that "bin Laden suffered serious complications in the lungs and died a natural and quiet death. The [Taliban] official... stated... that he had himself attended the funeral of bin Laden and saw his face prior to burial in Tora Bora 10 days ago... it is difficult to pinpoint the burial location... because according to the Wahhabi tradition, no mark is left by the grave. [The official] stressed that it is unlikely that the American forces would ever uncover any traces of bin Laden."

However, tapes, messages, even emails from bin Laden have kept popping up--at least for a while--in media circles.

In March 2002, the London-based paper al-Quds al-Arabi claimed it had received an email from bin Laden, which condemned the "betrayal" of Saudi Crown Prince Abdullah's offer in the name of the Arab world to establish normal relations with Israel if it pulled out of all territories occupied in 1967. Even though the newspaper's editor, Abdel Bari-Atwan, believed that the language and terminology matched that of former bin Laden messages, a verifiable connection could not be established.

"Asked if the message could have been forged by just anyone," reported the BBC, "he replied: 'It could be but I have a feeling that it is extremely genuine... because it was sent yesterday and we haven't received any denial from any part of the world.' Moreover, Mr. Bari-Atwan added, that it was 'expected' that bin Laden, who has been stripped of his Saudi citizenship, would dismiss the Saudi initiative as treason."

After reviewing the multitude of reports and analysis on the topic, it seems to us the belief that Osama bin Laden is still alive has taken on an air not dissimilar to that of the "Elvis lives" myth.

Most mysterious appearances seemed to occur in London. In May '02, an Islamic news agency released "fresh" video footage of bin Laden that was quickly debunked by Arab network al-Jazeera, which said it had seen the same tape 3-4 months before and believed it had been recorded in October 2001. In September, al-Jazeera itself came out with a video tape allegedly containing bin Laden's voice, although he couldn't be seen in the video. Two months later, Swiss speech analysts dissected a newly emerged audio tape, comparing the content with 20 former, verified bin Laden recordings--and concluded that, without a doubt, the new tape was a fake. U.S. experts, however, didn't concede; they believed it was "probably bin Laden speaking."

Dead or alive? In October 2002, the London-based Arab news magazine Al Majalla claimed to have acquired bin Laden's personal will and testament. The four-page document, supposedly dated December 14, 2001 in Afghanistan, expresses the writer's disappointment with the Taliban's failure ("Even amongst the students of religion, only few stood their ground and fought, and the rest either surrendered or fled"), goads on his followers to continue the good work ("Take a breather and put aside for the time being, fighting the Jews and the Crusaders, and instead devote your efforts to purifying your groups from the agents and the cowards and those impostors who claim to be scholars amongst you."), admonishing his sons not to join al-Qaeda and his wives not to think of getting remarried. The validity of the will has not been proven.

What's fact, what's fiction? No one knows for sure... considering all the evidence, though, it seems quite likely that Osama bin Laden died in late 2001. Which leaves us with a lot of questions that may never be answered... why, for example, did bin Laden never explicitly claim responsibility for the 9/11 attacks? Any die-hard Jihadist should have prided himself in having delivered such a devastating blow to Western society. It's a lapse that seems strangely at odds with bin Laden's previous, boastful demeanor. Chances are we will never know, and it's unlikely we'll ever see a body to prove his death.

Even though the evidence for the terrorist leader's death is quite persuasive, current newspaper headlines still portray bin Laden as al-Qaeda's wirepuller. On August 28, Ohio's American Daily gloomily announced, "Osama bin Laden's goal is your destruction", and the Philippine ABS CBN News shouted on 8/11/04 "Osama bin Laden calls for attacks".

Drawing again from the popular Orwellian theme, it seems like bin Laden has taken on the part of Emmanuel Goldstein, the forever elusive enemy of the state, whose name and image served in 1984 as convenient stimulus for the daily "Two Minutes Hate" of the brainwashed masses.

Dead or alive--it probably makes no difference. According to a senior Israeli intelligence officer talking to the World Tribune, "It doesn't matter whether bin Laden is alive or not. The organization goes on with help from key people."

**********************************************

END QUOTE

"As people do better, they start voting like Republicans--unless they have too much education and vote Democratic, which proves there can be too much of a good thing."

--Karl Rove

**********************************************

ENJOYING "WHAT WE NOW KNOW"? - SUBSCRIBE AND PASS IT ALONG!

For a limited time, EVERYONE is invited to join the rapidly growing ranks of aficionados reading "What We Now Know"--the informative weekly e-letter from Casey Research you can trust to keep you ahead of the crowd on emerging trends in investments, technology, health... life!

Don't miss a single issue – click here to sign up for your FREE subscription now.

If we ever fail to inform and maybe even entertain you a bit--you can always unsubscribe using the link found at the bottom of each issue. No tricks. No games. No obligations. And we don't sell your email address to third parties.

If you wish to provide feedback on any article, please write to feedback@caseyresearch.com.

InvestorsInsight Publishing, Inc. 14900 Landmark Blvd, Suite #350, Dallas, Texas 75254.

(c) Casey Research, Inc. 2004

5:16:37 PM