Saddam want to save innocent lives proposed to bush in dual!

SADDAM CHALLENGES BUSH TO A DUAL TO DEATH

This is an extract from a Scottish newspaper on friday october the 4th 2002, "daily record" aka the daily hun......

anyway this extract is about saddam hussein wanting to save innocent lives.... and stop the war and having another method of sorting their difference's.  One cares about peoples lives the other doesn't, one has moral the other doesn't. saddam in my opinion is a bad bad man, but bush is worse and what annoys me is "bush is saving the world" "war on TERRORISM". anyway ill get on with the article.

Bush dual to avoid attacks,

President Bush was yesterday challenged to a personal dual to the death with Saddam Hussein to aviod war. Iraq's vice-president, Taha Yasin Ramadan, made the astonishing and apparently serious suggestion to settle the crisis. He said vice-presidents should be on stand-by as seconds in case both leader should die together. Ramadan, a military figure not known for his sense of humour , said it was a way to ensure all Iraq did not suffer. He added that the UN's Secretary-General, Kofi Annan, should be referee. The president would choose their weapons for the clash at a neutral venue. Ramadan said: "in this way we are saving the American andthe Iraqi people." meanwhile allied planes launch a strike yesterday (thursday the 3rd of october 2002) after thought they were being fired upon as they dropped leaflets on an air base near tallil, 160 miles south-east of bagdad.         

                          end of article.

How much do people pay on "pay per view" the likes of Lennox Lewis v Mike Tyson to get into a ring to fight each other? Now how much would u pay on "pay per view" for a sky channel to show live coverage of  Saddam Hussien vs George W. Bush  to get in the ring and kill each other, I would. but when they said each fighter would choose a weapon do you think Bush would realise he isn't allowed to use a nuke?!?