|
 |
Sunday, February 2, 2003 |
Pay attention to the risks of libel law, if you begin to engage in online discussions or critiques that involve identities of others.
http://www.nationalreview.com/dreher/dreher091602.asp
The Rose vs. Johansen dispute demonstrates how quickly passionate polemics undertaken by ordinary people on the Internet can unintentionally become a serious legal matter. Sandra Baron, a lawyer and executive director of the Libel Defense Resource Center in New York, says amateurs voicing their opinions on the Internet have brought on an "astronomical" rise in civil libel suits in recent years.
3:06:40 PM
|
|
Here's a case where the question of the prior art really matters.
http://www.law.com/jsp/article.jsp?id=1042568717339
Here's my plea:
Publish and document on websites and in publications as much as you can. The way patents work is that the new invention proposed for the patent must be novel. It won't be novel if other people are already using it. Patents permit a patent owner to stop others from doing something equivalent. On the one hand, the whole community has a stake in knowing that genuinely new ideas are patented. On the other hand, the whole community has a stake in knowing that only the genuinely innovative idea receives patent protection.
Therefore, we all have a stake in publicizing what we know. That way maybe the Patent and Trademark Office will only reward true inventions with patent protections and permit the rest of us to benefit from what is known.
It's a terrible injustice for a person to receive a patent for something that was already known in the community at the time the patent was submitted. If the PTO cannot find out that the innovation was known previously, then there are both an unjust reward and an unjust harm to others.
2:29:44 PM
|
|
Here's the Washington Post story about GEWIS. http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A3409-2003Jan30?language=printer
For better or worse, the government is going to be doing a lot more supervising and monitoring of the internet.
Thanks to the SANS Institute for comments:
--GEWIS Internet Monitoring System
(31 January 2003)
The Bush administration is creating an Internet monitoring system
that will provide a picture of the Internet's health. The Global
Early Warning Information System (GEWIS - "Gee-whiz") will detect
and respond to denial-of-service attacks and other cyber incidents.
GEWIS is being built by the National Communications System, a defense
agency, which receives real time network status information from ISPs
and telecommunications providers.
[Editor's Note (Ranum): The only way to respond to DOS is to be in the
route the traffic is going to traverse. Detection by itself is a hard
problem, but this whole concept is ridiculous as it's described. Of
course phase 1 is just to provide a "Gee whiz" graphical picture of
the health of the Internet. That's doable, given the right data. I
bet that they won't get farther than that.
(Paller) I disagree with Marcus on this one. Marcus is correct that
only someone "in the path" can stop the attack. That "someone" is
usually the ISP. When Internet Storm Center found the Lion worm,
SANS analysts quickly informed the folks at the ISPs who acted
instantly to block the China.com site where the worm was sending
stolen password files. In other words, early detection can lead to
immediate remediation.]
2:09:39 PM
|
|
Remarkable radar of the space shuttle disappearance:
http://www.dondrake.com/archives/000112.html
Thanks to:
Donald Drake
President
Drake Consulting
http://www.drakeconsult.com/
p: 312-560-1574
f: 312-896-5736
We're coming into a time when we should all remember that life is more dangerous than we realize. Our thoughts and prayers are with the loved ones of those involved in the space shuttle program, and expecially those aboard.
2:00:46 PM
|
|
© Copyright 2003 Noel D. Humphreys.
|
|
|
|
|
3/2/03 |
|
2/27/03 |
|
2/26/03 |
|
2/26/03 |
|
2/26/03 |
|
2/26/03 |
|
2/26/03 |
|
2/25/03 |
|
2/25/03 |
|
2/25/03 |
|
2/25/03 |
|
2/24/03 |
|
2/23/03 |
|
2/21/03 |
|
2/19/03 |
|
2/19/03 |
|
2/19/03 |
|
2/19/03 |
|
2/12/03 |
|
2/12/03 |
|
2/12/03 |
|
2/12/03 |
|
2/11/03 |
|
2/11/03 |
|
2/11/03 |
|
2/10/03 |
|
|